O.E. Petrunia – Ph.D. (Philos.), Associate Professor, Department of Philosophy, Moscow Aviation Institute  (National research university) 

E-mail: hypostasis@yandex.ru 

L.V. Poskotinova – Dr.Sc. (Biol.), Associate Professor, 

N. Laverov Federal Center for Integrated Arctic Research of RAS (Arkhangelsk)

E-mail: liliya200572@mail.ru

Problem statement. The study of biofeedback and the creation on this basis of biofeedback methodology initiated numerous scientific studies and practical applications. However, the accelerated penetration of information and cybernetic models and methods in this area, ahead of their theoretical and methodological understanding, reveals a number of vulnerabilities, which in the case of uncontrolled development can turn into serious problems of biomedical, environmental and social plan, creating a threat of unpredictable transformations of man as a biological species.

The aim of the work. To justify the necessity of creating human-dimensional models of biofeedback physiological indicators of the subject on the basis of bionic and individual approaches, including the experience of subjective feelings of well-being. Results. The reasons of existence of basic vulnerabilities in modern models of biofeedback are revealed and ways of their elimination are planned.

Practical significance. The results can be used as a conceptual basis for the discussion and formulation of strategies for the development of biofeedback methodology, the development of fruitful research programs in the industry, the formulation and solution of theoretical and methodological problems and the creation of specific techniques.

1. Venda V.F. O zakonah vzaimnoj adaptacii i transformacii sistem. Voprosy filosofii, 2017. № 2. S. 94–105.
2. Venda V.F. Sistemy gibridnogo intellekta: Evolyuciya, psihologiya, informatika. M.: Mashinostroenie. 1990. 448 s.
3. Markov A.A. CHto takoe kibernetika?. Kibernetika, myshlenie, zhizn'. Pod red. A.I. Berga. B.V. Biryukova, I.B. Novika, I.V. Kuznecova, A.G. Spirkina. M.: Izd-vo social'no-ekonomicheskoj literatury «Mysl'». 1964. S. 49.
4. Nejman Dzh., fon. Obshchaya i logicheskaya teoriya avtomatov. V kn.: A. T'yuring. Mozhet li mashina myslit': Per. s angl. M.: Gos. izd-vo fizikomatematicheskoj literatury. 1960. S. 39–65.
5. Petrunya O.E. Aktual'nye problemy informacionnogo podhoda v biomedicine. Biomedicinskaya radioelektronika. 2017. № 10. S. 82–84. 
6. Petrunya O.E. Biomedicina i antropnyj podhod (princip). Biomedicinskaya radioelektronika. 2017. № 3. S. 77–84.
7. Petrunya O.E. Dimenzional'naya ontologiya V. Frankla kak konceptual'naya osnova mezhdisciplinarnogo sinteza biome-diciny, psihologii i komp'yutinga. Biomedicinskaya radioelektronika. 2015. № 4. S. 58–59. 
8. Petrunya O.E. Kontroverza estestvennogo i iskusstvennogo v nejronaukah: «kto vinovat» i «chto delat'». Nejrokomp'-yutery: razrabotka, primenenie. 2017. № 4. S. 26–30. 
9. Petrunya O.E. Problema chelovekomernosti v biomedicine i bioinzhenerii. Biomedicinskaya radioelektronika. 2016. № 5. S. 16–17. 
10. Petrunya O.E. Rossiya i Evropa: Ekologicheskie riski v usloviyah global'nogo krizisa. Metodologicheskij aspekt. Aktu-al'nye problemy Evropy = Urgent problems of Europe. Sb. nauchn. tr.. RAN. INION. Centr nauchn.-inform. issled. glo-bal. i regional. probl. Otd. Zap. Evropy i Ameriki. – M., 2014. – № 1: Ekologicheskaya politika Evropy i Rossii v so-vremennyh usloviyah = Contemporary ecological policy of Europe and Russia: Innovation development and modernization of economies. S. 49–76. 
11. Poskotinova L.V. Bioupravlenie fiziologicheskimi pokazatelyami i problema intersub"ektivnosti. Aktual'nye vo-prosy nejrofilosofii–2015. Mat. mezhdunarod. mezhdisciplinarnogo seminara «Nejrofilosofiya». Red.: A.YU. Alekse-ev, D.I. Dubrovskij, V.G. Kuznecov. M.: IIntell. 2016. S. 213–218. 
12. Savel'ev A.V. Filosofsko-metodologicheskie osnovaniya nejrokomp'yutinga: Diss. … kand. filos. nauk. M. 2016. 159 s.
13. Frankl V. CHelovek v poiskah smysla: Sb.: Per. s angl. i nem.. Pod obshch. red. L.Ya. Gozmana i D.A. Leont'eva. M.: Pro-gress. 1990. 368 s. 
14. Harari YU.N. 21 urok dlya XXI veka: Per. s angl. Yu. Goldberga. M.: Sindbad. 2019. 416 s.
15. YAnovskaya S.A. Predislovie k russkomu perevodu. V kn.: A. T'yuring. Mozhet li mashina myslit'? Per. s angl. M.: Gos. izd-vo fiziko-matematicheskoj literatury. 1960. S. 3–11.
16. Milgram S. Obedience to Authority. An Experimental View. New York: Harper and Row. 1974. 224 p.
17. Patricia B. Burns, Rod J. Rohrich, Kevin C. Chung. The Levels of Evidence and their role in Evidence-Based Medicine. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2011. V. 128(1). P. 305–310. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318219c171 
18. Turchin V., Joslyn C. The Cybernetic Manifesto. Rezhim dostupa: http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/MANIFESTO.html
19. Turing A. Computing Machinery and Intelligence. Mind. October. 1950. V. LIX (236). P. 433–460.
20. Mironova N.B. Psevdoscientizm: diskurs istinnosti i simulyakry nauchnosti. Sovremennye problemy gumanitarnyh i obshchestvennyh nauk. 2018.  № 4(21). S. 57–60.
21. Savel'ev A.V. Nejrosociometodologiya problemy dialoga mezhdu nejrobiologiej i nejromodelirovaniem. Nejrokom-p'yutery: razrabotka, primenenie. 2011. № 1. S. 47–63. 
22. Savel'ev A.V. Osobennosti elektrohimicheskogo vihrevogo rasprostraneniya spajkov v aksonal'noj sisteme nejronov. Biomedicinskaya radioelektronika. 2012. № 8. S. 46–55. 
23. Leshchev S.V. Sinergeticheskoe izmerenie nejroplatformy: kontinual'nye interfejsy. Biomedicinskaya radioelektro-nika. 2016. № 4. S.71–72.