350 rub
Journal Biomedical Radioelectronics №3 for 2017 г.
Article in number:
Convergent NBIC-paradigm and modern education
Keywords: convergent paradigm NBICS technology transdisciplinary biomedicine medical equipment and technologies scientific picture of the world education
Authors:
O.E. Backsanskiy - Dr.Sc. (Philos.), Professor, Professor RAS, Leading Research Scientist, Philosophy Institute of RAS, Moscow E-mail: obucks@mail.ru
Abstract:
The main goal of this work is to carry out the analysis of methodology of development of convergent technologies, transdisciplinary integration and influence of it on change of a scientific picture of the world and methodology of biomedicine, biomedical equipment and technologies with the analysis of possible negative sides of this process. Analytical approach to the knowledge of the structure of matter was replaced by a synthetic, dominated by interdisciplinary research, increasing their diversity. They take the integrative function in relation to the individual sciences; converging science of organic and inorganic nature, integration becomes transdisciplinary sciences. Differentiation from special trend of the evolution of science becomes a dominant point in its integration process and differentiation and integration processes are merged into a single integral-differential synthesis. Interactions between the outer inner unity of science are increased and become indistinguishable often.
Pages: 71-76
References

 

  1. Roco M., Bainbridge W. (eds). Converging Technologies for Improving Human Performance: Nanotechnology, Biotechnology, Information Technology and Cognitive Science. Arlington. 2004. http://www.transhumanism-russia.ru/content/view/498/116/ednref1.
  2. Baksanskijj O.E. Kognitivnye reprezentacii: obydennye, socialnye, nauchnye. M.: URSS. 2009. 220 s.
  3. Baksanskijj O.E. Fiziki i matematiki: analiz osnovanija vzaimootnoshenija. M.: Librokom. 2009. 183 s.
  4. Baksanskijj O.E., Gnatik E.N., Kucher E.N. Estestvoznanie: sovremennye kognitivnye koncepcii. M.: URSS. 2008. 220 s.
  5. Baksanskijj O.E., Gnatik E.N., Kucher E.N. Nanotekhnologii. Biomedicina. Filosofija obrazovanija. V zerkale mezhdisciplinarnogo konteksta. M. 2010. 224 s.
  6. Baksanskijj O.E., Kucher E.N. Kognitivno-sinergeti­cheskaja paradigma NLP: ot poznanija k dejjstviju. M.: URSS. 2005. 184 s.
  7. Baksanskijj O.E., Kucher E.N. Kognitivnyjj obraz mira: prolegomeny k filosofii obrazovanija. M.: Kanon + ROOI Reabilitacija. 2010. 224 s.
  8. Savelev A. V. Uchenie ob ehpistemologicheskojj strategii // Filosofija nauki. 2004. № 2(21). S. 3-17. http://www.sciteclibrary.ru/rus/catalog/pages/8374.html. 2006.
  9. Savelev A. V. EHpistemologija samopoznanija v nejjrokompjuternojj paradigme // Filosofija nauki. 2007. № 3 (34). S. 41-59.
  10. Savelev A.V. Internet i nejjrokompjutery kak sociotekhnologicheskie strategii iskusstvennogo mira // Filosofskie nauki. 2004. № 6. S. 100-113.
  11. Roco M.C., Bainbridge W.S. Converging technologies for improving human performance: nanotechnology, biotechnology, information technology and cognitive science. Dordrecht. 2003. 488 p.
  12. Kovalchuk M.V. Nauka i zhizn: moja konvergencija. M.: Akademkniga. 2011. T. 1. 304 s.
  13. Kastels M. Informacionnaja ehpokha: ehkonomika, obshhestvo, kultura. M.: Gos. Un-t. Vysshaja shkola ehkonomiki. 2000. 606 s.
  14. Mironova N. B. Tekhnomodus prostranstva ehticheskogo v konvergentnom mire // Vestnik nauchnykh konferencijj. 2016. № 12-1(16). S. 86-87.
  15. Mironova N. B. EHvoljucija ehtosa: tekhnonauchnye vyzovy konvergencii // Novaja nauka: Teoreticheskijj i prakticheskijj vzgljad. Sterlitamak: AMI. 2016. № 117-2. S. 235-237.
  16. Leshhjov S. V. Interfejjsy socialnojj ehkologii: ot tekhnologicheskojj konvergencii k internetu veshhejj // Filosofskie nauki. 2014. № 11. S. 106-113.