G.I. Shulgina Dr.Sc. (Biol.), Professor, Faculty of Psychology, State Academy of Slavic Culture (Moscow). E-mail: shulgina28@mail.ru D.A. Berezhnaya Acting Head of Department of Psychological Researches, SBU, «MITs» (Moscow). Е-mail: dashur@list.ru D.S. Berezhnoy Ph.D. (Biol.), Leading Engineer, Chair of Higher Nervous Activity, Moscow State University (Moscow). Е-mail: berezhnoy.daniil@gmail.com O.N. Volkova Student, Faculty of Psychology, State Academy of Slavic Culture (Moscow). Е-mail: zru84@mail.ru E.A. Zyablitseva Ph.D. (Biol.), Assiciate Professor, Department of Psychology, Military University (Moscow). Е-mail: evgeniazia@mail.ru E.A. Karavayeva Ph.D. (Psychol.), Head of Psychological Service, GBON SOSh 799 (Moscow). E-mail: kea.77@mail.ru

In the current work the method of measuring the main nervous system properties (excitation, inhibition, disinhibition) with the use of computer games and proofreading tests (modification of Burdon test) is proposed. The tasks used in the experiments were based on the experimental designs used in classical conditioning experiments and results were interpreted from this point of view. On the basis of mistakes, made by examinees during learning of active actions and their holding, criteria of excitation, inhibition and a disinhibition processes assessment were developed. Dependence of the received results on the CNS individual properties and age of examinees is revealed. Interesting data on possibility of identification of interaction of the instruction, working memory and action of last experience in process of performance of the next task are received. The approach to an assessment of properties offered by us and conditions of nervous system on the basis of development of active and inhibitory conditioned reflexes with application of proofreading tests and computer games probably can be considered as the productive technique supplementing the available any tests in psychophysiology. At further more expanded research and development of accurate indicators of norm and deviations from it, that and other test can be widely used in practice of pedagogies, medicine and selection of personals. The perspective of further research in this field is shown.

 

1. Shul-gina G.I.The neurophysiological Validation of the Hyperpolarization Theory of Internal Inhibition // TheSpanishJournalofPsychology. 2005. V. 8. № 1. P. 86-99.
2. SHulgina G.I. Analiz nejjromediatornogo obespechenija sistemnojj organizacii nejjronov golovnogo mozga pri obuchenii: vozbuzhdenie, tormozhenie, rastormazhivanie // Uspekhi fiziologicheskikh nauk. 2008. T. 39.  № 4. S. 26 - 51.
3. Shul-gina G.I. Disinhibition as the Foundation for Reinforcement in Conditioned Acqisition of Active Behaviors // Psychology Research. 2013. V. 3. №2. R. 53-68.
4. Teplov B.M. Tipologicheskie svojjstva nervnojj sistemy i ikh znachenie dlja psikhologii // Filosofskie voprosy fiziologii vysshejj nervnojj dejatelnosti i psikhologii. M.: Izd-vo AN SSSR. 1963. S. 475-586.
5. Streljau JA. Rol temperamenta v psikhologicheskom razvitii. M.: Progress. 1982. 231 s.
6. EysenckS.B., EysenckH.J.Physiologicalreactivity to sensory stimulation as a measure of personality // Psychol. Rep. 1967. V. 20. № 1. P. 45-46.
7. Ilin E.P. Psikhologija individualnykh razlichijj. SPb. 2004. 701 c.
8. SHapkin S.A.Kompjuternaja igra: novaja oblast psikhologicheskikh issledovanijj // Psikhologicheskijj zhurnal. 1999. № 1. S. 47-67.
9. SHmelev A.G. Psikhodiagnostika i novye informacionnye tekhnologii // Kompjutery i poznanie. M.: Nauka. 1990. C. 67-105.
10. Kornienko P.A. Kompjuternaja igra kak metod diagnostiki individualnykh osobennostejj samoreguljacii // Psikhologicheskaja nauka i obrazovanie. 2008. № 5. S. 175-181.
11. Vergunov E.G. Kolichestvennyjj podkhod k ocenke sformirovannosti kompetencii samoreguljacii u studentov-psikhologov // Psikhologija obrazovanija v polikulturnom prostranstve. 2013. T. 3. № 23. S. 30-35.
12. Cothran D.L., Larsen R. Comparison of inhibition in two timed reaction tasks: the color and emotion Stroop tasks // J. Psychol. 2008. V. 142. № 4. P. 373-385.
13. JAsjukova L.A. Psikhologicheskaja profilaktika problem v obuchenii i razvitii shkolnikov. SPb.: Rech. 2003. 384 s.
14. Voronin L.G. Fiziologija vysshejj nervnojj dejatelnosti. M.: Vyssh. shkola. 1979. 312 s.
15. Krylova A.A., Manicheva S.A. Praktikum po obshhejj ehksperimentalnojj i prikladnojj psikhologii. SPb. 2002. S. 126-128.
16. Dempster F.N., Corkill A.J. Interference and inhibition in cognition and behavior: Unifying themes for educational psychology // Education­al Psychology Review. 1999. V. 11.№ 1. P. 1-88.
17. Sergienko V.A., Vilenskaja G.A., Kovaljova JU.G. Kon­trol povedenija kak subektnaja reguljacija. M.:  IP RAN. 2011. 353 s.
18. Blinkov S.M., Glezer I.I. Mozg cheloveka v cifrakh i tablicakh. M. 1964. 471 s.
19. Razvitie psikhofiziologicheskikh funkcijj vzroslykh ljudejj (srednjaja vzroslost) / pod red. B.G. AnanevaiE.I. Stepanovojj.M. 1977. 198 s.