A. V. Dardymov1, Yu. I. Choni2
1, 2 Kazan National Research Technical University named after A.N. Tupolev-KAI (Kazan, Russia)

1 anatoly.dardymov@yandex.ru, 2 tchoni@rambler.ru

Multibeam hybrid reflector antenna (MBHRA) is part of high-performance satellite communication systems. It provides high gain thanks to its large mirror and the use of antenna array to form enough beams covering the working area. Therefore, it is crucial to maintain the needed beams configuration to provide clients with high quality signal. The location of the beams may change because the reflector profile changes under the changeable thermal flux from the Sun, which is not stationary due to orbital motion of the satellite. Although the appearing distortions of the reflector profile are a priori small, but they cause beams to displace from their assigned positions in up to their width of tenth of a degree. Consequently, the level of the signal in coverage areas goes down.

Modern MBHRA form their beams with clusters, i.e. groups of elements of the antenna array. Typically, cluster consists out of seven elements: one in the center and others at the vertices of a perfect hexagon. The fact that several antenna elements form a beam opens up the possibility of electronically controlling the beams by adjusting the amplitudes and phases of the exciting distribution, or more precisely, the weighting coefficients of the clusters.

To determine which amplitudes and phases to apply, it is necessary to know the current state of the reflector, characterized by either its geometry or its electrodynamic equivalent, such as the best-fit paraboloid (BFP). Laser measurement and photogrammetry are popular solutions for that. A useful alternative to them is reconstruction of the BFP from the signals received by the MBHRA antenna array from a ground-based radio beacon. Emphasizing the dependence of these signals on the state of the reflector, we call them the “signal imprint” of the reflector.

The possibility to implement a single ground beacon is due approximation the reflector profile as an equivalent best-fit paraboloid. BFP is uniquely defined by six parameters: change of the focal length, turns in two orthogonal planes and shift of the apex in space {ΔF; αz; αy; Δx; Δy; Δz}. Since some of the parameters are highly correlated in terms of their influence on the signal imprint, the re-construction problem becomes more complicated. So a question whether the set of parameters is overloaded arises reasonably. Maybe it is possible to get rid of some parameters.

We considered two options to reduce the number of parameters: focal displacement + turns {ΔF; αz; αy} and apex shift {Δx; Δy; Δz}. Statistical modelling confirms the possibility to reduce the number of sought-for BFP parameters down to the mentioned three instead of six. If the maximum of the focal spot does not shift outside the cluster, then reducing the number of the sought-for BFP parameters to three causes a very small decrease in the gain of beams compared to using the full set of parameters. For the above options, the decrease in gain is 0.03 dB or 0.25 dB. It is interesting to note that in the turns option {ΔF; αz; αy} there is a better correspondence to the reflector surface compared to the displacement option {Δx; Δy; Δz}, but worse matching of the signal imprint, and as a consequence a greater loss in gain. This is due to the higher sensitivity of the beam orientation to the mirror rotations than to the vertex displacement.

Dardymov A.V., Choni Yu.I. Refocusing beams of a satellite mirror antenna with moderate deformations of its reflector. Antennas. 2024. № 3. P. 21–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18127/j03209601-202403-03 (in Russian)

1. Wang C.S., Yuan S., Liu X., et al. Temperature distribution and influence mechanism on large reflector antennas under solar radiation: solar thermal effect on reflector antenna. Radio science. 2017. V. 52. № 10. P. 1253–1260.
2. Shendalev D.O. Proektirovanie formoobrazuyushchej struktury zontichnogo reflektora. Vestnik SibGAU. 2013. № 6 (52). S. 164–173. (in Russian)
3. Tajgin V.B., Lopatin A.V. Metod obespecheniya vysokoj tochnosti formy reflektorov zerkal'nykh antenn kosmicheskikh apparatov. Kosmicheskie apparaty i tekhnologii. 2019. T. 3. № 4. S. 200–208. DOI: 10.26732/2618-7957-2019-4-200-208. (in Russian)
4. Gryanik M.V., Loman V.I. Razvertyvaemye zerkal'nye antenny zontichnogo tipa. M.: Radio i svyaz'. 1987. (in Russian)
5. Subrahmanyan R. Photogrammetric measurement of the gravity deformation in a Cassegrain antenna. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation. 2005. V. 53. № 8. P. 2590–2596.
6. Kalabegashvili G.I., Bikeev E.V., Matylenko M.G. Selection of the device for orbital alignment of a large transformable antenna reflector. Reshetnev readings. 2018. P. 121–122.
7. Bikeev E.V., Yakimov E.N., Matylenko M.G., Titov G.P. Sposob kompensatsii deformatsij konstruktsii krupnogabaritnoj antenny kosmicheskogo apparata. Vestnik SibGAU. 2016. T. 17. № 3. S. 673–683. (in Russian)
8. Sledyashchij optoelektronnyj monitoring deformatsij v zadache dinamicheskoj yustirovki ustrojstv prostranstvennogo nablyudeniya. Pod red. A.V. Ushakova. SPb.: SPb GU ITMO. 2008. (in Russian)
9. Dai M., Newman T.S., Cao C. Least-squares-based fitting of paraboloids. Pattern recognition. 2007. V. 40. № 2. P. 504–515.
10. Goldobin N.N. Metodika otsenki formy radiootrazhayushchej poverkhnosti krupnogabaritnogo transformiruemogo reflektora kosmicheskogo apparata. Vestnik SibGAU. 2013. № 1 (47). S. 106–111. (in Russian)
11. Goldobin N.N. Analiz effektivnosti orbital'noj yustirovki krupnogabaritnogo reflektora. Reshetnevskie chteniya. 2018. S. 97–99. (in Russian)
12. Goldobin N.N. Otsenka tochnosti navedeniya reflektora na osnovanii informatsii ob otkloneniyakh kontsov ego silovykh spits. Reshetnevskie chteniya. 2016. S. 102–104. (in Russian)
13. Nesterov Yu. Introductory lectures on convex optimization: a basic course. Springer. 2004.
14. Mochalov V.V. Attestatsiya algoritma akusticheskogo priblizheniya. Uspekhi sovremennoj radioelektroniki. 2019. № 12. S. 124–128. (in Russian)
15. Mochalov V.V., Romanov A.G., Danilov I.Yu., Choni Yu.I. Adaptivnoe upravlenie klasterami mnogoluchevoj gibridnoj zerkal'noj antenny v interesakh stabilizatsii energeticheskogo potentsiala sputnikovoj sistemy svyazi. Zhurnal radioelektroniki [elektronnyj zhurnal]. 2020. № 1. URL: http://jre.cplire.ru/jre/jan20/10/text.pdf. DOI 10.30898/1684-1719.2020.1.10. (in Russian)