E. N. Gorlacheva¹, E.M. Ivannikova²

1 Bauman Moscow State Technical University (Moscow, Russia),

2 Moscow Polytechnic University (Moscow, Russia)

The analysis of high technology enterprises’ activity shows that despite their strategic role their economic development is rather irregularly.

The purpose of the research is to analyze the influence of economic growth rate on the innovation development of the high technology enterprises.

The enterprises that have been under the research have shown the good results, the majority of them have positive economic growth rate. The comparison of total factor productivity in the researched enterprises and in Russian enterprises in general shows that high technology enterprises are more productive than other ones. It leads to the conclusion that one could pay more attention to the key reallocation mechanisms and the mechanism of the constructive destruction.

The comparison of the total factor productivity in Russia with other states shows that Russia is a country with the transition economy where there is a big necessity to stimulate innovation activity on the enterprise level and the decrease in productivity level inside the country.

Gorlacheva E.N., Ivannikova E.M. The influence of the economic growth rate onto the innovation development. Science Intensive Technologies. 2021. V. 22. № 1. P. 35−48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18127/j19998465-202101-05 (In Russian).

1. Bashirova Z.A., Iskhakova E.I. Vliyanie innovacij na ekonomicheskij rost. Ekonomika Professiya Biznes. 2019. № 1. S. 19–23.
2. Barro R.Dzh., Sala-i-Martin H. Ekonomicheskij rost. M.: Binom. Laboratoriya znanij. 2017. 824 s. (In Russian).
3. Bessonov V.A. O dinamike sovokupnoj faktornoj proizvoditel'nosti v rossijskoj perekhodnoj ekonomike. Ekonomicheskij zhurnal VShE. 2004. № 4. S. 542–587 (In Russian).
4. Vasil'ev A.N., Shchukina A.Ya. Analiz dinamiki innovacionnoj aktivnosti ekonomiki Rossijskoj Federacii za 2003–2016 gg.. Vestnik VUiT. 2018. № 1. S. 18–28 (In Russian).
5. Dvoreckaya A.E. Innovacionnaya aktivnost' rossijskih predpriyatij: analiz sovremennoj situacii. Mezhdunarodnyj nauchno-prakticheskij internet-zhurnal «PRO-Ekonomika». 2018. № 7 (In Russian).
6. Zamulin O.A., Sonin K.I.  Ekonomicheskij rost: Nobelevskaya premiya 2018 goda i uroki dlya Rossii. Voprosy ekonomiki. 2019. № 1.  S. 11–36 (In Russian).
7. Zurabyan A.S. Innovacionnaya aktivnost' promyshlennyh predpriyatij i mekhanizmy ee stimulirovaniya. TDR. 2016. № 6. S. 27–29 (In Russian).
8. Gohberg L.M., Ditkovskij K.A., Kuznecova I.A. i dr. Indikatory innovacionnoj deyatel'nosti: 2019: statisticheskij sbornik. Nac. issled.  un-t «Vysshaya shkola ekonomiki». M.: NIU VShE. 2019. 376 s. (In Russian).
9. Karlik A.E., Platonov V.V. Issledovanie innovacionnogo razvitiya predpriyatij: problemy i tendencii. Strategii biznesa. 2016. № 7 (27).  S. 13–16 (In Russian).
10. Katukov D.D., Malygin V.E., Smorodinskaya N.V. Faktor sozidatel'nogo razrusheniya v sovremennyh modelyah i politike ekonomicheskogo rosta. Voprosy ekonomiki. 2019. № 7. S. 95–118 (In Russian).
11. Korshunov V.A., Rajnhardt R.O. Ocenka ostatka Solou dlya real'nogo i potencial'nogo VVP: prakticheskij raschet dlya stran – chlenov OESR. Vestnik Instituta ekonomiki RAN. 2017. № 3. S. 137–149 (In Russian).
12. Mamonov M.E., Pestova A.A., Sabel'nikova E.M., Apokin A.Yu. Podhody k ocenke faktorov proizvodstva i tekhnologicheskogo razvitiya nacional'nyh ekonomik: obzor mirovoj praktiki. Problemy prognozirovaniya. 2015. № 6. S. 45–57.
13. Metodika rascheta pokazatelya «Koefficient obnovleniya osnovnyh fondov» [Elektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://www.gks.ru/storage/ mediabank/metodika.doc (data obrashcheniya: 12.04.2020) (In Russian).
14. Nauka i innovacii Federal'naya sluzhba gosudarstvennoj statistiki [Elektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://www.gks.ru/folder/14477 (data obrashcheniya: 27.03.2020) (In Russian).
15. Naumova E. Modeli ekonomicheskogo rosta i teoreticheskie osnovaniya innovacionnogo razvitiya. Izdanie MGIMO MID Rossii zhurnal «Mirovoe i nacional'noe hozyajstvo». 2017. № 4(43) (In Russian).
16. Nezavisimyj istochnik informacii ob organizacii [Elektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://www.rusprofile.ru/ (data obrashcheniya: 03.05.2020) (In Russian).
17. Osnovnye fondy Federal'naya sluzhba gosudarstvennoj statistiki [Elektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://www.gks.ru/folder/14304 (data obrashcheniya: 14.05.2020) (In Russian).
18. Pestunov M.A. Innovacionnaya blizorukost' kak institucional'nyj ogranichitel' ekonomicheskogo rosta. Ekonomicheskij analiz: teoriya i praktika. 2006. № 13. S. 37–46 (In Russian).
19. Safiullin A.R. Intellektualizaciya sovremennoj ekonomiki: opyt stran organizacii ekonomicheskogo sotrudnichestva i razvitiya. Ekonomicheskij analiz: teoriya i praktika. 2012. № 5. S. 56–60 (In Russian).
20. Servis Prozrachnyj biznes FNS Rossii [Elektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://pb.nalog.ru/index.html (data obrashcheniya: 03.05.2020) (In Russian).
21. Smorodinskaya N.V., Katukov D.D., Malygin V.E. Shumpeterianskaya teoriya rosta v kontekste perekhoda ekonomicheskih sistem k innovacionnomu razvitiyu. Journal of Institutional Studies. 2019. № 11(2). S. 60–78 (In Russian).
22. Stroka 1120 «Rezul'taty issledovanij i razrabotok» V pomoshch' buhgalteru [Elektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://mvf.klerk.ru/f1otchet/f1_1120.htm (data obrashcheniya: 17.04.2020) (In Russian).
23. Akindinova N.V., Yasin E.G., Avdeeva D.A. i dr. Scenarii rosta rossijskoj ekonomiki s uchetom vklada chelovecheskogo kapitala: Dokl. k XX Apr. mezhdunar. nauchn. konf. po problemam razvitiya ekonomiki i obshchestva, Moskva, 9–12 apr. 2019 g. Nac. issled. un-t «Vysshaya shkola ekonomiki». M.: Izd. dom Vysshej shkoly ekonomiki. 2019 (In Russian).
24. Top rejtinga «TekhUspekh» – 2019 [Elektronnyj resurs]. URL: http://ratingtechup.ru/rate/2019/?TOP=130 (data obrashcheniya: 22.04.2020) (In Russian).
25. Trudovye resursy Federal'naya sluzhba gosudarstvennoj statistiki [Elektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://www.gks.ru/labour_force (data obrashcheniya: 13.05.2020) (In Russian).
26. Had'kova L.T. Problema intellektualizacii v ekonomike. Ekonomicheskie nauki. 2017. № 5 (150). S. 11–13 (In Russian).
27. Egert B. Aggregate multi-factor productivity: Measurement issues in OECD countries. OECD Economics Department Working Papers. 2017. № 1441.
28. Gal P.N. Measuring Total Factor Productivity at the Firm Level using OECD-ORBIS. OECD Economics Department Working Papers. 2013. №1049.
29. Main Science and Technology Indicators. 2019. Is 2. OECD Publishing. Paris. 2020.
30. OECD (2020), Gross domestic product (GDP) (indicator) [Elektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/dc2f7aec-en (data obrashcheniya: 16.05.2020).
31. OECD (2020), Multifactor productivity (indicator) [Elektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/a40c5025-en (data obrashcheniya: 16.05.2020).
32. OECD (2020), Investment by asset (indicator) [Elektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/8e5d47e6-en (data obrashcheniya: 22.04.2020).
33. OECD Compendium of Productivity Indicators 2019. OECD Publishing, Paris. 2019.
34. Wölfl A., Hajkova D. Measuring multifactor productivity growth. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers. 2007/05.