Quang Thuong Nguyen – Dr.Sc.(Eng.), Professor, 

State University of Management (Moscow)

E-mail: tikhonovrus@gmail.com

Anh Hien Vu – Post-graduate Student, 

Department of Management and Informatics, «National Research University «MPEI» (Moscow) E-mail: vahien@mail.ru

T.V. Yagodkina – Ph.D.(Eng.), Associate Professor, 

Department of Management and Informatics, «National Research University «MPEI» (Moscow) E-mail: dembskaya@mail.ru

The problem of UAV control in conditions of multi-factor uncertainty is presented. UAV controls are selected in the form of program control and positional control (homing rules). The algorithm for generating control actions based on the target environment data is based on a statistical assessment of the UAV's effectiveness using the probability of achieving the goal according to the maximum and minimum condition of the regularity criterion for all possible combinations of uncontrolled factors.

A statistical estimate of the probability of achieving the goal by calculating the flight path in accordance with the laws of distribution of uncontrolled factors is presented. The alignment of positional controls with software controls and thus the transition to a more convenient synthesis of software controls is implemented using a complex statistical sample. At the same time, the angles of attack and slip are represented in the form of software controls in the form of trigonometric polynomials, and the formation of stable software controls is significantly simplified. The structure of the basic functions is selected based on the nature of the reference trajectory in the UAV guidance area and the optimal positional control is determined by a statistical sample that is derived from the sample. Thus, statistical synthesis models the effectiveness of UAVS is carried out according to the design decision of positioning control the angle of attack slip through approximation of coefficient in the form of power polynomials and program management in the form of trigonometric polynomials. This allows you to align positional controls with software controls and thus move to a more convenient synthesis of software controls.

1. Balakin V.L., Lazarev Yu.N. Dinamika poleta samoleta. Ustoichivost i upravlyaemost prodolnogo dvizheniya. Samara. 2011. (in Russian)
2. Tsarev F.N. Sovmestnoe primenenie geneticheskogo programmirovanie, konechnykh avtomatov i iskusstvennykh neironnykh setei dlya postroeniya sistemy upravleniya bespilotnym letalnym apparatom. Nauchno-tekhnich. vestnik SPbGU ITMO. 2008. Vypusk 53. Avtomatnoe programmirovanie. S. 42−60. (in Russian)
3. Zbigniew Koruba, Edyta Ładyżyńska-Kozdraś. The dynamic model of a combat target homing system of an unmanned aerial vehicle. Journal of theoretical and applied mechanics. Warsaw 2010, 48, 3. P. 551−566.
4. Cao J. et al. Research of Integrated Design about Guidance and Control of Homing UAV. Applied Mechanics and Materials. 2013. V. 373−375. P. 1428−1431.
5. Balyk V.M. Statistical synthesis of design solutions in complex system development. M.: MAI Publishing. 2014. 278 p.
6. Balyk V.M., Ilichev A.V., Sorokin V.A. Metody prinyatiya proektnykh reshenii na osnove modelei effektivnosti dvukhsrednogo letatelnogo apparata. M.: Izd-vo MAI. 2015. 219 s. (in Russian)
7. Brusov V.S., Petruchik V.P., Morozov N.I. Aerodynamics and flight dynamics of small-sized unmanned aerial vehicles. M.: MAI-PRINT Publishing. 2010. 338 p.
8. Gundlach J. Designing Unmanned Aircaft Systems. A Comprehensive Approach. AIAA, Reston. Virginia. 2012.