N.E. Sadkovskaya1, A.N. Manin2, A.V. Prudnikov3
1–3 Moscow Aviation Institute (National Research University) (Moscow, Russia)

1 natsadkovskaya@rambler.ru, 2 andreym012@gmail.com, 3 pav15042001@gmail.com

The modern radioelectronic industry is characterized by high technological complexity, multi-stage production chains, and strict requirements for product quality and full traceability. Fragmented information systems and isolated automation solutions do not provide end-to-end visibility of processes and adequate support for managerial decision-making. There is a growing need for the unified digital environment that connects the corporate management level, shop-floor execution level, and industrial automation level, forming an integrated “digital twin” of production. In practice, however, the roles of different system classes (ERP, MES, SCADA and specialized subsystems), the structure of exchanged data, and the set of key performance indicators used for control remain insufficiently systematized.

The objective of the study is to analyze the role and interaction of integrated production management systems in the radioelectronic industry, to describe the structure of vertical and horizontal integration of ERP, MES, SCADA and functional subsystems (APS, PLM, WMS, QMS, EAM) and to identify the key data categories and performance indicators that constitute a unified information space of the enterprise.

The study provides a conceptual comparison of major classes of production management systems in terms of their purpose, management level, functions, advantages, and limitations. The structured data model has been proposed, covering production operations, equipment performance and downtimes, product quality, material flows, and personnel activities. Based on this model, the integrated KPI system has been defined, including OEE, TPT, FPY, scrap rates, plan fulfillment, inventory turnover, and labour productivity. The paper presents diagrams of vertical integration (ERP–MES–SCADA), horizontal integration of functional subsystems, interaction with external supply-chain participants, and formation of a unified information space supporting managerial decision-making.

The results can be used in designing and modernizing the information architecture of radioelectronic manufacturing enterprises, justifying ERP/MES/SCADA implementation projects, and setting priorities for digital transformation. The proposed integration schemes and KPI system provide a methodological basis for building a production “digital twin”, increasing process transparency, reducing downtimes and defect rates, and improving planning and resource management through data-driven decision-making.

Sadkovskaya N.E., Manin A.N., Prudnikov A.V. Integration of digital control systems as a foundation for production in the radioelectronic industry. Neurocomputers. 2026. V. 28. № 1. P. 58–63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18127/j19998554-202601-06 (in Russian)

1. Naumov A.V., Levashova D.V. «FOTONIKA-2025»: chetyre novelly o budushchem. Photonics Russia. 2025. T. 19. № 3. S. 180–190. (in Russian)
2. Lee J., Bagheri B., Kao H.A. A cyber-physical systems architecture for Industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems. Manufacturing Letters. 2015. № 3. P. 18–23.
3. Stepanov D.Yu. Integratsiya ERP i MES-sistem: vzglyad sverkhu. Sovremennye tekhnologii avtomatizatsii. 2016. № 2. S. 108–111. (in Russian)
4. Soldatov S. Integratsiya SCADA-sistem i sistem upravleniya predpriyatiem. Sovremennye tekhnologii avtomatizatsii. 2016. № 1. S. 90–95. (in Russian)
5. Voronin P.A., Belevtsev A.M., Aleksandrova S.S. Razrabotka obshchego algoritma i struktury avtomatizirovannoj sistemy informatsionnoj podderzhki predpriyatiya radiolokatsionnogo profilya. Izvestiya YuFU. Tekhnicheskie nauki. 2023. № 2. S. 240–250. (in Russian)
6. Goncharenko D.V., Kartamysheva K.V. Povyshenie effektivnosti proizvodstva s pomoshch'yu ispol'zovaniya MES-sistem. The Scientific Heritage. 2017. № 8-2. S. 11–12. (in Russian)