350 rub
Journal Neurocomputers №4 for 2016 г.
Article in number:
Analysis of changes in the concept of « knowledge» from the point of view of modern structural representations
Keywords: knowledge knowledge model information text philosophy human cognition tacit knowledge explicit knowledge
Authors:
G.B. Bronfeld - Ph.D. (Eng.), Associate Professor, Nizhny Novgorod State Technical University n.a. R.E. Alekseev. E-mail: stolem1985@gmail.com
Abstract:
The article analyzes the concept of knowledge with a historical perspective on the development of science and the theory of knowledge in the change of views on the structure of knowledge. Begins with consideration of the views of \"knowledge\" with Socrates and Plato, then F.Bacon, R. Lullius, W. Ockham, I. Kant, in the twentieth century - J. Hintikka, M. Polanyi, K. Popper. Describes what the end of the twentieth century unfold the powerful processes of \"information explosion\", which adversely affect the overall scientific and technical sphere. Indicates that a new four-level structure of knowledge in a whole new way to mathematically represent knowledge components and a fresh look at the issue of knowledge. This would not only reduce the severity of the situation, but also will attract well-known mathematical methods to the individual components of knowledge with capabilities previously unattainable on the same methodological basis.
Pages: 48-56
References

 

  1. SHenk R. Obrabotka konceptualnojj informacii. M.: EHnergija. 1980. 360 s.
  2. Nemirovskijj E.L. Bolshaja kniga o knige. M.: Vremja. 2010. 1088 s.
  3. Dobrov G.M. Nauka o nauke. Vvedenie v obshhee naukovedenie. M.: Nauka. 1966. 271 s.
  4. Kosolapov V.V., SHHerban A.N. Optimizacija nauchno-tekhnicheskojj dejatelnosti. Kiev: Naukova Dumka. 1971. 300 s.
  5. Polani M. Lichnostnoe znanie. Na puti k postkriticheskojj filosofii. M.: Progress. 1985. 343 s.
  6. Informacionnye tekhnologii v biznese / pod red. M. ZHeleny. SPb.: Piter. 2002. 1120 s.
  7. Verevchenko A.L. i dr. Informacionnye resursy dlja prinjatija reshenijj.M.: Akademicheskijj proekt. 2002. 560 s.
  8. Alekseeva I.JU. CHelovecheskoe znanie i ego kompjuternyjj obraz. M.: Institut filosofii RAN. 1993. 215 s.
  9. Sukhotin A.K. Gnoseologicheskijj analiz emkosti znanija. Tomsk: TGU. 1968.204 s.
  10. SHalak V.I. O logicheskom sledovanii // Vestnik MGU. Ser. 7: Filosofija. 2007. № 5. S. 89-101.
  11. Lorer ZH.-L.Sistemy iskusstvennogo intellekta. M.: Mir. 1991. 568 s.
  12. Gukhman V.B. Filosofija informacionnogo podkhoda. Tver: Izd-vo Tverskogo gos. tekhn. un-ta. 2000. 167 s.
  13. Sedjakin V.P. Informacija i znanija // Nauchnye vedomosti Belgorodskogo gos. un-ta. Ser.: Filosofija. Sociologija. Pravo. 2009. T.8. № 8. S. 180-187.
  14. Malyshev O.V. Voploshhennoe znanie // Matematichni mashini i sistemi. 2009. № 1. S. 55-69.
  15. Newell A. The knowledge level // Artificial Intelligence. 1982. V. 18. № 1. P. 87-127.
  16. Iskusstvennyjj intellekt. V 3-kh kn.: Kn. 2. Modeli i metody: Spravochnik / Pod red. D.A. Pospelova. M.: Radioisvjaz. 1990. 304 s.
  17. Bloomfield B. Expert systems and human knowledge: A view from the sociology // AI@Society. 1988. V.2. № 1. P. 15-29.
  18. Averjanov L.JA.Kontent-analiz. M.: KNORUS. 2009. 456 s.
  19. Lederberg J., Sutherland G.L., Buchanan B.C., Feigenbaum E.A., Robertson A.V., Duffield A.M., Djerassi C. Applications of artificial intelligence for chemical inference. 1. The number of possible organic compounds. Acyclic structures containing C, H, O and N // Journal of American Chemical Society, May 1969. P. 2973-2976.
  20. Kandrashina E.JU., Litvinceva L.V., Pospelov D.A. Predstavlenie znanijj o vremeni i prostranstve v intellektualnykh sistemakh. M.: Nauka. Gl. red. fiz.-mat. lit. 1989. 328 s.
  21. Gavrilova T.A., KHoroshevskijj V.F. Bazy znanijj intellektualnykh sistem. SPb.: Piter. 2001. 384 s.
  22. Carpenter S. A. A Primer: Enterprise Wisdom Management and the Flow of Understanding, 2008, http://www.cognitivecybernetics.com/PrimerFoU.html ; 25.08.15.
  23. Cleveland H. Information as a Resource // The Futurist, December 1982. P. 34-39.
  24. Zeleny M. Management Support Systems: Towards Integrated Knowledge Management // Human Systems Management 1987. № 7 (1).P. 59-70.
  25. Ackoff R. From Data to Wisdom // Journal of Applied Systems Analysis. 1989. №16.R.3-9.
  26. Carpenter S. A.,Cannady J. Tool for Sharing and Assessing Models of Fusion-Based Space Trans-portation Systems // Proceedings of the 40th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit. (July 11-14. 2004). Fort Lauderdale, Florida.
  27. Tuomi I. Data is More than Knowledge: Implications of the Reversed Knowledge Hierarchy for Knowledge Management and Organizational Memory // Journal of Management Information Systems. 16(3) (Winter 1999-2000).R.103-107.
  28. Bronfeld G.B. Nekotorye vozmozhnosti formalnogo predstavlenija struktury znanijj // Trudy Nizhegorodskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta im. R.E. Alekseeva. 2012. № 4(97). S. 91-100.
  29. Bronfeld G.B. Osnovy iskusstvennogo intellekta. N. Novgorod: Nizhegorod. gos. tekhn. un-t. im. R.E. Alekseeva. 2014. 253 s.
  30. Bronfeld G.B. Prjamoe nalozhenie znanijj i ego vozmozhnosti. Analiz, metodologija, novaja model znanijj, algoritmy, vozmozhnosti «nevozmozhnosti». Saarbrucken, Deutschland: LAP LAMBERT Academic Puplishng. 2014. 236 s.
  31. Sovpel I.V. Sistema avtomaticheskogo izvlechenija znanijj iz teksta i ee prilozhenija // Iskusstvennyjj intellekt. 2004. № 3. S. 668-679.
  32. SHrejjder JU.A. EHVM kak sredstvo predstavlenija znanijj // Priroda. 1986. № 10. S.14-22.