N.G. Zhuravleva - Research Scientist, Trapeznikov Institute of Control Sciences of RAS (Moscow) Yu.S. Legovich - Ph.D. (Eng.), Head of Laboratory, Trapeznikov Institute of Control Sciences of RAS. E-mail: legov@ipu.rssi.ru D. Yu. Maximov - Research Scientist, Trapeznikov Institute of Control Sciences of RAS. E-mail: phoenixjhanjaa@yandex.ru Yu.V. Maximov - Leading engineer, Trapeznikov Institute of Control Sciences of RAS. E-mail: phoenixjhanjaa@yandex.ru

The point of view at an estimation of a net-centric control system vulnerability is proposed. The method of approach is based on a value of the damage which a negative influence on the net elements causes to the control system. The communication network is presented over a subsystem which feeds the necessary information to performers of the control system main functions. As the lack of information makes it impossible for performers to fulfill their duty and external influences on some network elements lead to damage the transmission of information through the network we suggest making use a value of the damage to estimate a vulnerability of the control system communication network. Relationships between deviations of network state vector parameters and increase dysfunction of the network are presented. These relations give us the opportunity to estimate a value of the control system damage and a vulnerability of the communication network.

 

1. Pavlovskijj I.S. Issledovanie setecentricheskogo podkhoda k upravleniju na osnove odnorodnogo konceptualnogo modelirovanija // Tekhnicheskie i programmnye sredstva sistem upravlenija, kontrolja i izmerenija (UKI-12): Rossijjskaja konferencija s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem 16-19 aprelja 2012 goda. M.: IPU RAN. 2012. S. 84.
2. Efremov A.JU., Maksimov D.JU. Setecentricheskaja sistema upravlenija ? chto vkladyvaetsja v ehto ponjatie - // Trudy Tretejj rossijjskojj konferencii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem «Tekhnicheskie i programmnye sredstva sistem upravlenija, kontrolja i izmerenija». M.: IPU RAN. 2012. S. 158-161.
3. Skljarov I. F. Sistema - sistemnyjj podkhod - teorija sistem. M.: Knizhnyjj dom «LIBROKOM». 2011. 152 s.
4. Olifer V. G., Olifer N. A. Novye tekhnologii i oborudovanie IP-setejj. SPb.: BKHV - Sankt-Peterburg. 2000. 512 s.
5. Malashenko JU. E., Novikova N. M. Mnogokriterialnyjj sintez potokovykh setejj s garantiejj zhivuchesti. M.: VC RAN. 2000. 19 s.
6. Kulba V. V., Kononov D. A., Kosjachenko S. A., Kochkarov A. A., Somov D. S. Ispolzovanie scenarnogo i indikatornogo podkhodov dlja upravlenija zhivuchestju, stojjkostju i bezopasnostju slozhnykh tekhnicheskikh sistem. M.: IPU im. V. A. Trapeznikova RAN. 2011. 116 s.
7. Kondratev A. E. Sovremennye tendencii v issledovanii kriticheskojj infrastruktury v zarubezhnykh stranakh // Zarubezhnoe voennoe obozrenie 2012. №1. S. 19-30.
8. KHaken G. Informacija i samoorganizacija: Makroskopicheskijj podkhod k slozhnym sistemam. M.: Mir. 1991. 240 s.
9. Maksimov D. JU., Maksimov JU. V. Ocenka kachestva prinimaemykh reshenijj pri upravlenii setecentricheskimi sistemami. Informacionnyjj podkhod // Trudy XIXMezhdunarodnojj konferencii «Problemy upravlenija bezopasnostju slozhnykh sistem». Moskva, dekabr 2011 g. S. 205-208.
10. Kormen T., Lejjzerson CH., Rivest R. Algoritmy: postroenie i analiz. M.: MCNMO. 2001. 960 s.
11. Baryshev P.F., Rozhnov A.V., Gubin A.N., Lobanov I.A. Obosnovanie informacionno-analiticheskojj sistemy v razvitii metodov i modelejj soglasovanija ierarkhicheskikh reshenijj // Dinamika slozhnykh sistem - XXI vek. 2014. № 3. S. 43-52.
12. Rozhnov A.V., Krivonozhko V.E., Lychev A.V. Postroenie gibridnykh intellektualnykh informacionnykh sred i komponentov ehkspertnykh sistem na osnove obobshhennojj modeli analiza sredy funkcionirovanija // Nejjrokompjutery: razrabotka, primenenie. 2013. № 6. S. 3-12.