V.I. Ljutin1, S.V. Utemov2

1, 2 EW Research Center of the Air Force’s MESC «Military Air Force Academy» (Voronezh, Russia)

1lyutin_v_i@mail.ru

To implement methods of protecting critical objects from medium- and long-range guided missiles with combined guidance systems a methodology has been developed for calculating permissible misses, which ensure the protection of typical critically important stationary ground objects, taking into account their vulnerability and design features.

Calculations were performed for 3 types of cruise missiles with high-explosive fragmentation warhead: AGM-86C Block 1A, AGM-158C, BGM-109C,-D Block III, and 4 types of cruise missiles with penetrating warhead: Storm Shadow, KEPD 350 Taurus, Apache, AGM-130E. The objectivity of the results obtained is confirmed by the use of probabilistic and statistical calculation methods.

The values of the misses of medium- and long-range guided missiles with high-explosive and penetrating warheads required to substantiate the requirements for the elements of information support, control and jamming subsystems of the protection of stationary ground objects have been established.

Ljutin V.I., Utemov S.V. Justification of the required guided missile misses to protect stationary objects of various types. Information-measuring and Control Systems. 2025. V. 23. № 2. P. 5−11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18127/j20700814-202502-01 (in Russian)

1. Serzhantov A.V., Martodolyak A.P. Analiz osobennostei sovremennykh voennykh konfliktov. Voennaya mysl. 2011. № 5. S. 36−44. (in Russian)
2. Metodicheskie rekomendatsii po provedeniyu inventarizatsii kriticheski vazhnykh i (ili) potentsialno opasnykh ob'ektov Rossiiskoi Federatsii i formirovaniyu perechnya kriticheski vazhnykh ob'ektov na regionalnom urovne. Utverzhdena zamestitelem Ministra RF po delam grazhdanskoi oborony, chrezvychainym situatsiyam i likvidatsii posledstvii stikhiinykh bedstvii 19.06.2008 № 2-4-60-10-14. M.: 2008. (in Russian)
3. Ivanov A.V., Kurolap SA., Klepikov O.V. Kostyleva S.N., Filimonova O.N., Fedii G.L. Identifikatsiya ekologicheski opasnykh ob'ektov i prognozirovanie tekhnogennykh posledstvii ikh porazheniya. Voronezh: Nauchnaya kniga. 2017. 177 s. (in Russian)
4. Evdokimov V.I. Raketnyi obstrel kak novaya forma terrorizma. Zashchita i bezopasnost. 2008. 3(46). S. 18−19. (in Russian)
5. Zubrov V. Osnashchenie vooruzhennykh sil SShA sovremennymi kompleksami aviatsionnogo vooruzheniya. Zarubezhnoe voennoe obozrenie. 2022. № 9. S. 58−66. (in Russian)
6. Bezyaev V.S., Kulikov E.S. Podkhody k sozdaniyu sredstv zashchity ot atakuyushchikh elementov vysokotochnogo oruzhiya. Informatsionno-izmeritelnye i upravlyayushchie sistemy. 2014. T. 12. № 4. S. 58−61. (in Russian)
7. Palii A.I. Problema zashchity ob'ektov ekonomiki i infrastruktury ot VTO silami i sredstvami grazhdanskoi oborony. Sb. materialov tsentra strategicheskikh issledovanii grazhdanskoi zashchity. M.: TsSI GZ MChS Rossii. 2001. № 8. S. 16−17. (in Russian)
8. Zaitsev A. K grazhdanskoi oborone voobshche ne gotovy. Zashchita i bezopasnost. 2018. № 2. S. 16−17. (in Russian)
9. Ardashev A. Zashchita shakhtnykh puskovykh ustanovok ot vysokotochnogo oruzhiya. Tekhnika i vooruzhenie: vchera, segodnya, zavtra. 2004. № 4. S. 31−34. (in Russian)
10. Roldugin V.D., Kolodyko Yu.V. Obshchie polozheniya metodiki vybora porazhaemykh kombinatsii kriticheski vazhnykh ob'ektov protivnika. Strategicheskaya stabilnost. 2014. № 4. S. 30−34. (in Russian)
11. Pokrovskii G.I. Vzryv. M.: Nedra. 1980. 180 s. (in Russian)
12. Orlenko L.P. Fizika vzryva i udara: Ucheb. posobie dlya vuzov. M.: FIZMATLIT. 2006. 304 s. (in Russian)