B.I. Ulitin1, E.A. Babkin2, S.V. Zykov3

1-3 HSE University (Moscow, Russia)

1 bulitin@hse.ru, 2 eababkin@hse.ru, 3 szykov@hse.ru

The article is devoted to the use of the TOPSIS method for assessing socio-economic threats to the development of farmlands. The main goal is to integrate the method with GIS for further decision-making procedures within the framework of ensuring sustainable socio-economic development of the farmlands. In this case, the concept of management can include various aspects, such as, for example, prevention, adaptive response, mitigation or elimination.

Fuzzy TOPSIS methods, econometric and index analysis methods of various indicators of the socio-economic use of farmlands are used. The model for applying the fuzzy TOPSIS method proposed in the article and the integration of results with GIS ensures adaptive analysis and sustainable management of the development processes of farmlands.

The synergistic effectiveness of technological, human- and business-oriented factors in a comprehensive assessment of the use of farmlands is substantiated. The proposed model for integrating the TOPSIS method and GIS is an anti-crisis management tool within the framework of ensuring sustainable socio-economic development of the farmlands.

Ulitin B.I., Babkin E.A., Zykov S.V. Extending the TOPSIS method to support decision making in GIS based on elements of category theory. Information-measuring and Control Systems. 2024. V. 22. № 5. P. 6−13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18127/j20700814-202405-01 (in Russian)

1. Roche L.M. Adaptive rangeland decision-making and coping with drought. Sustainability. 2016. V. 8(12). P. 13−34.
2. Baharvandi M., Abdi N., Ahmadi A., Zar H.T., Rezaei S.G. The effectiveness of rangeland management plans from the viewpoints of beneficiaries, experts, and managers. Arab. J. Geosci. 2022. V. 15(8). P. 1−14.
3. Farid M., Iqbal S., Rana D.N., Mushtaq H., Sarfraz W., Islam M., Raza N., Ramzan M., Umer M., Saqib Z. Development of rangeland conservation and sustainable management practices under changing climate. Managing Plant Production under Changing Environment. 2022. P. 327−349.
4. Zykov S.V. IT Crisisology Models: Object-Based Optimization for Sustainable Development. Springer Series in Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies (Switzerland: Springer). 2024. V. 381. 195 p. ISBN: 978-981-99-8648-4.
5. Mafi-Gholami D., Jaafari A., Zenner E.K., Kamari A.N., Bui D.T. Vulnerability of coastal communities to climate change: thirty-year trend analysis and prospective prediction for the coastal regions of the Persian Gulf and Gulf of Oman. Sci. Total Environ. 2020. V. 741.
6. Choden K., Keenan R.J., Nitschke C.R. An approach for assessing adaptive capacity to climate change in resource dependent communities in the Nikachu watershed. Bhutan. Ecol. Indic. 2020. V. 114.
7. Albulescu A.C. et al. A GIS-based application of fuzzy AHP and classical TOPSIS methods on assessing the seismic vulnerability of Galati City. Romania. A.C.
8. Albulescu A.C., Grozavu A., Larion D.. Int. Multidiscipl. Sci. Geoconf. 2019. V. 19 (2). P. 737−744.
9. Analiticheskaya zapiska RAN "Zemelnyi potentsial Rossii: sostoyanie, problemy i mery po ego ratsionalnomu ispolzovaniyu i okhrane". 2023. [https://www.ras.ru/FStorage/Download.aspx?id=5e5ba20e-8e6f-440b-8e17-5b52118fe86c&ysclid=luy8p c9kxp204364923]. (in Russian)
10. Raufirad V., Heidari Q., Hunter R., Ghorbani J. Relationship between socioeconomic vulnerability and ecological sustainability: the case of Aran-V-Bidgol’s rangelands Iran. Ecol. Indic. 2018. V. 85. P. 613−623.
11. Balioti V., Tzimopoulos C., Evangelides C. Multi-criteria decision making using TOPSIS method under fuzzy environment. Application in spillway selection. 2018. V. 2(11). P. 637−641.
12. GIS Panorama AGRO [https://gisinfo.ru/products/products_agro.htm]. (in Russian)
13. Wood D.A. Net ecosystem exchange comparative analysis of the relative influence of recorded variables in well monitored ecosystems. Ecol. Complex. 2022. V. 50.