Journal Highly available systems №4 for 2018 г.
Article in number:
Psychological aspects of informational security in the age of Big Data
Type of article: scientific article
DOI: 10.18127/j20729472-201804-06
UDC: 004
Authors:

E.A. Mikheev – Post-graduate Student, Institute of psychology of RAS (Moscow)

E-mail: mih-news@mail.ru

T.A. Nestik – Dr.Sc.(Psych.), Professor of RAS, Head of Laboratory, Institute of psychology of RAS (Moscow) E-mail: nestik@ipras.ru

Abstract:

Problems of psychological security in era of Big Data analysis are discussed. Information-psychological threats such as using personal data of social network users for mass consciousness manipulation, using Big Data in information operations (IO), psychological operations (PsyOP) and cyber operations were analyzed. It is concluded that during development of mechanism to minimize emerging risks individual psychological and sociоpsychological traits of target audience and subjects of information security support (experts in information security) should be taken into account.

The research is supported by a grant of the Russian Science Foundation (project № 18-18-00439 «Psychology of human beings in conditions of global risks»).

Pages: 23-27
References
  1. Grachev G.V. Informatsionno-psikhologicheskaya bezopasnost' lichnosti: sostoyanie i vozmozhnosti psikhologicheskoi zashchity. M.: Izd-vo RAGS. 1998. 125 p.
  2. Karasev P.A. SShA narashchivayut kibersily // Zhurnal «Ekspert». Yanvar' 2018. URL = http://expert.ru/2017/08/2/ssha-naraschivayutkibersilyi/ (data obrashcheniya 21.06.2018).
  3. Pilipenko V.F. Bezopasnost': teoriya,paradigma, kontseptsiya, kul'tura. Slovar'-spravochnik. Izd. 2-e, dop. i pererab. M.: PER SE-Press. 2005. 192 p.
  4. Chernyak L. Bezopasnost' bol'shikh dannykh // Otkrytye sistemy SUBD. 2013. №2. URL = https://www.osp.ru/os/2013/02/13034551 (data obrashcheniya 21.07.2018).
  5. Yakupov V., Smirnov I. Protivoborstvo v kiberprostranstve: napravleniya razvitiya sil i sredstv // Zhurnal «Zarubezhnoe voennoe obozrenie». 2018. №3. P. 13−18.
  6. Allied Joint Doctrine for Psychological Operations. AJP-3.10.1. September 2014. URL = https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/450521/20150223-AJP_3_10_1_PSYOPS_with_UK_Green_pages.pdf (data obrashcheniya 21.06.2018).
  7. Azacur D., Settani M., Marengo D. Predicting the Big 5 personality traits from digital footprints on social media: A meta-analysis // Personality and Individual Differences. 2018. № 124. P. 150−159. URL = https://www.researchgate.net/publication/ 321965757_Predicting_the_Big_5_personality_traits_from_digital_footprints_on_social_media_A_meta-nalysis (data obrashcheniya 21.07.2018).
  8. Kosinski M., Stillwell D., Graepel T. Private traits and attributes are predictable from digital records of human behavior // Proc. of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. PNAS. 2013. № 110. P. 5802−5805. URL = http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1218772110 (data obrashcheniya 21.07.2018).
  9. Kosinski M., Matz S.C., Gosling S.D., Popov V., Stillwell D. Facebook as a research tool for the social sciences: Opportunities, challenges, ethical considerations, and practical guide // American Psychologist. 2015. № 70. P. 543−556. URL = http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/ a0039210 (data obrashcheniya 21.07.2018).
  10. Rosenberg M. Cambridge Analytica, Trump-Tied Political Firm, Offered to Entrap Politicians // The New York Times. March, 20.2018. P. 1. URL = https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/19/us/cambridge-analytica-alexander-nix.html (data obrashcheniya 21.07.2018).
  11. Youyou W., Kosinski M., Stillwell D. Computer-based personality judgments are more accurate than those made by humans // PNAS. January 27, 2015. URL = http://www.pnas.org/content/112/4/1036.full (data obrashcheniya 21.07.2018).
Date of receipt: 3 августа 2018 г.