350 rub
Journal Highly available systems №1 for 2017 г.
Article in number:
Analysis of the uncertainty of geo-information when visualizing the objects of the Arctic zone, which allows for the existence of an active mapping background
Authors:
S.K. Dulin - Dr. Sc. (Eng.), Professor, Leading Research Scientist, FRC «Computer Science and Control» RAS (Moscow) N.G. Dulina - Ph. D. (Eng.), Senior Research Scientist, FRC «Computer Science and Control» RAS (Moscow)
Abstract:
The article discusses the status of uncertainty arising in the processing of images obtained as a result of monitoring the Arctic zone. The development of a methodology for analyzing the uncertainty of geodata in an integrated GIS is relevant for creating a single repository of optical and radar information in the Arctic zone. Because geodata are converted from the raw form to the semantic representations used by GIS, they are used in various conceptual models of geodata. Each model and each transformation process contributes to the overall uncertainty of the data, which is why the properties of the geodatabase model and uncertainty characteristics are analyzed. The approach described in this article can be used as a basis for modeling various forms of uncertainty in order to test their interrelations and develop methods for their evaluation.
Pages: 52-64
References

 

  1. Dulin S.K., Rozenberg I.N., Umanskijj V.I. Integracija geokoncepcijj pri generalizacii karty Arkticheskojj zony // Sistemy vysokojj dostupnosti. 2016. T. 12. № 3. S. 9−18.
  2. Aerts J.C.J.H., Goodchild M.F., Heuvelink G.B.M. Accounting for spatial uncertainty in optimization with spatial decision support systems // Transactions in GIS. 2003. V. 7. № 2. P. 211−230.
  3. Duckham M. A user-oriented perspective of error-sensitive GIS development // Transactions in GIS. 2002. V. 6. № 2. P. 179−194.
  4. Zhang I.-X., Goodchild M.F. Uncertainty in Geographical Information. New York: Taylor and Francis. 2002.
  5. Goodchild M.F. A general framework for error analysis in measurement-based GIS // Journal of Geographical Systems. 2004. V. 6. № 4. P. 323−324.
  6. Heuvelink G.B.M. Handling spatial uncertainty in GIS: development of the data uncertainty engine. Estoril. Portugal: Instituto Geografico Portugues. 2005.
  7. Kyriakidis P., Goodchild M.F. On the prediction error variance of three common spatial interpolation schemes // International Journal of Geographical Information Science. 2006. V. 20. № 8. P. 823−856.
  8. Fisher P.F., Unwin D.J. Re-Presenting GIS. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. 2005.