350 rub
Journal Electromagnetic Waves and Electronic Systems №2 for 2012 г.
Article in number:
The synergetic valuations of multimedia systems perception quality
Authors:
S.S. Zwezhinskii, A.G. Simonjan, A.A. Teniakshev
Abstract:
For multimedia systems audiovisual quality prediction we need to create a rate that considers audio and video components playback quality. During the multimedia systems combined quality estimation, we cannot show it as a simple combination of components, because it does not give us an adequate to real conditions perception quality. The 3G mobile systems, that support audio and video stream services had become real though its perception quality is limited because of low transfer rate. For optimal audio and video codec parameters choosing it is important to consider the proper quality requirements based on human perception. We examined the stream video quality estimation audiovisual model that considers audio and video components of multimedia files; we gave the mutual compensation of audio and video quality definition; we showed the synergetic valuations of multimedia systems perception quality. So we had given the correlations for subjective quality estimation to predict the clips audiovisual quality based on its impartial descriptions that allow to make multimedia systems perception quality synergetic valuations.
Pages: 27-31
References
  1. Winkler, S., Digital Video Quality. Vision Models and Metrics. Genista Corporation, Montreux, Switzerland. Jan. 2005. P. 38-39.S.
  2. Winkler, S., Digital Video Quality. Vision Models and Metrics. Genista Corporation, Montreux, Switzerland. Jan. 2005. P.: 38-39.
  3. American National Standard for Telecommunications. T1.801.03-2003. Working Group on Performance, Reliability, and Signal Processing. Digital Transport of One-Way Video Signals- Parameters for Objective Performance Assessment. Copyright 2004 by Alliance for Telecommunication Industy Solutions.
  4. Puglia, R., Influence of audio and video quality on subjective audiovisual quality H.263 and adaptive multi rate (AMR) coding. P.: 58-61.
  5. Nemethova, O., Ries, M., Siffel, E., Rupp, M., Quality Assessment for H.264 Coded Low-Rate and low-Resolution Video Sequences. Proc. of Conference on Internet and Information Technologies (CIIT). St. Thomas. US Virgin Islands. Nov. 2004. P. 136-140.
  6. ISO/IEC 14496-3:2001/ Amd.2:2004, Parametric Coding for High Quality Audio, 2001.
  7. ITU-T Recommendation P. 910 - 1999, Subjective video quality assessment methods for multimedia application. International Telecommunication Union.