D.G. Lapitan, A.A. Glazkov, D.A. Rogatkin

Moscow Regional Research and Clinical Institute (MONIKI) n.a. M.F. Vladimirskiy (Moscow, Russian Federation)  

Photoplethysmography (PPG) is an optical method for recording pulse wave (PW) propagating in the tissue microvasculature. As a rule, filters with infinite impulse response (Butterworth, Bessel, etc.) often used in PPG signal processing introduce distortions in the PW signal. At the same time, the filtering parameters for a more accurate reproduction of PW have not yet been substantiated. The aim of this work is to study the influence of digital filtering parameters, such as bandwidth and filter order, on the pulse waveform. In the study, a digital bandpass Butterworth filter was used. The lower cutoff frequency of the filter varied from 0.1 to 1 Hz, the upper cutoff frequency varied from 2 to 10 Hz and the filter order – from 2nd to 6th. It was found that an increase in the lower cutoff frequency of the bandpass filtering leads to a decrease in the amplitude of the reflected diastolic wave and distortion of the front of the direct systolic wave. A decrease in the upper cutoff frequency leads to damping of the dicrotic notch and a phase shift of the PW. Increasing the filter order decreases the reflected wave amplitude. The minimal distortions of the PPG signal were observed at the lower cutoff frequency of 0.1 Hz, the upper one at 10 Hz and the filter order equal to 2. Thus, these parameters of a bandpass filtering can be recommended for processing PPG signals for a more accurate morphological analysis of PW. The obtained results make it possible to create devices for PW analysis with substantiated medical and technical requirements for filtration parameters.

Lapitan D.G., Glazkov A.A., Rogatkin D.A. Influence of digital filtering parameters on the pulse waveform in reflectance photoplethysmography. Biomedicine Radioengineering. 2021. V. 24. № 3. P. 37–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18127/j15604136-202103-04 (in Russian).

1. Allen J. Photoplethysmography and its application in clinical physiological measurement. Physiological measurement. 2007. V. 28. № 3. P. R1–R39.
2. Kamal A.A.R., Harness J.B., Irving G., Mearns A.J. Skin photoplethysmography—a review. Computer methods and programs in biomedicine. 1989. V. 28. № 4. P. 257–269.
3. Allen J., Murray A. Similarity in bilateral photoplethysmographic peripheral pulse wave characteristics at the ears, thumbs and toes. Physiological measurement. 2000. V. 21. № 3. P. 369–377.
4. Elgendi M. On the analysis of fingertip photoplethysmogram signals. Current cardiology reviews. 2012. V. 8. № 1. P. 14–25.
5. Millasseau S.C., Ritter J.M., Takazawa K., Chowienczyk P.J. Contour analysis of the photoplethysmographic pulse measured at the finger. Journal of hypertension. 2006. V. 24. № 8. P. 1449–1456.
6. Millasseau S.C., Kelly R.P., Ritter J.M., Chowienczyk P.J. The vascular impact of aging andvasoactive drugs: comparison of two digital volume pulse measurements. American journal of hypertension. 2003. V. 16. № 6. P. 467–472.
7. Elgendi M., Fletcher R., Liang Y., Howard N., Lovell N.H., Abbott D., Lim K., Ward R. The use of photoplethysmography for assessing hypertension. npj Digit. Med. 2019. V. 2. P. 60.
8. Stoner L., Young J. M., Fryer S. Assessments of arterial stiffness and endothelial function using pulse wave analysis. International journal of vascular medicine. 2012. V. 2012.
9. Lindberg L.G., Oberg P.A. Photoplethysmography. Part 2. Influence of light source wavelength. Medical & Biological engineering & Computing. 1991. V. 29. № 1. P. 48–54.
10. Spigulis J., Gailite L., Lihachev A., Erts R. Simultaneous recording of skin blood pulsations at different vascular depths by multiwavelength photoplethysmography. Applied optics. 2007. V. 46. № 10. P. 1754–1759.
11. Allen J., Murray A. Age-related changes in the characteristics of the photoplethysmographic pulse shape at various body sites. Physiological measurement. 2003. V. 24. № 2. P. 297–307.
12. Lapitan D.G., Glazkov A.A., Rogatkin D.A. Ocenka vozrastnyh izmenenij elastichnosti stenok perifericheskih sosudov metodom fotopletizmografii. Medicinskaya fizika. 2020. № 3. S. 71–77 (In Russian).
13. Peng F., Liu H., Wang W. A comb filter based signal processing method to effectively reduce motion artifacts from photoplethysmographic signals. Physiological measurement. 2015. V. 36. № 10. P. 2159–2170.
14. Lee J. Motion artifacts reduction from PPG using cyclic moving average filter. Technology and Health Care. 2014. V. 22. № 3. P. 409–417.
15. Fedotov A.A. A pulse wave monitor with adaptive filtering of motion artifacts. Biomedical Engineering. 2020. V. 53. № 6. P. 375–379.
16. Park C., Shin H., Lee B. Blockwise PPG enhancement based on time-variant zero-phase harmonic notch filtering. Sensors. 2017. V. 17. № 4. P. 860.
17. Silva I., Lee J., Mark R.G. Signal quality estimation with multichannel adaptive filtering in intensive care settings. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering. 2012. V. 59. № 9. P. 2476–2485.
18. Liang Y., Elgendi M., Chen Z., Ward R. An optimal filter for short photoplethysmogram signals. Scientific data. 2018. V. 5. P. 180076.
19. Tan L., Jiang J. Digital signal processing: fundamentals and applications. Academic Press. 2018.
20. Nakajima K., Tamura T., Miike H. Monitoring of heart and respiratory rates by photoplethysmography using a digital filtering technique. Medical Engineering & Physics. 1996. V. 18. № 5. P. 365–372.
21. Moraes J.L., Rocha M.X., Vasconcelos G.G., Vasconcelos Filho J.E., De Albuquerque V.H.C., Alexandria A.R. Advances in photopletysmography signal analysis for biomedical applications. Sensors. 2018. V. 18. № 6. P. 1894.
22. Allen J., Murray A. Effects of filtering on multisite photoplethysmography pulse waveform characteristics. Computers in Cardiology. 2004. IEEE. 2004. P. 485–488.
23. Stuban N., Niwayama M. Optimal filter bandwidth for pulse oximetry. Review of Scientific Instruments. 2012. V. 83. № 10. P. 104708.
24. Lapitan D., Rogatkin D. Optical incoherent technique for noninvasive assessment of blood flow in tissues: Theoretical model and experimental study. Journal of Biophotonics. 2021. V. 14. № 5. P. e202000459.
25. Lapitan D.G., Raznitsyn O.A. A Method and a Device Prototype for Noninvasive Measurements of Blood Perfusion in a Tissue. Instruments and Experimental Techniques. 2018. V. 61. № 5. P. 745–750.
26. Rogatkin D.A. Fizicheskie osnovy opticheskoj oksimetrii. Medicinskaya fizika. 2012. № 2. S. 97–114 (In Russian).
27. Lapitan D.G., Tarasov A.P. Analytical Assessment of the Modulation Depth of Photoplethysmographic Signal Based on the Modified Beer-Lambert Law. 2019 IEEE 8th International Conference on Advanced Optoelectronics and Lasers (CAOL). IEEE, 2019. P. 103–106.
28. Zumbahlen H. Phase Response in Active Filters; Part 3—The Band-Pass Response. Analog Dialogue. 2016. 50-03.
29. Anisimov A.A., Yuldashev Z.M., Bibicheva Y.G. Non-occlusion Monitoring of Arterial Pressure Dynamics from Pulsation Wave Propagation Time. Biomedical Engineering. 2014. V. 48. № 2. P. 66–69.