350 rub
Journal Biomedical Radioelectronics №2 for 2009 г.
Article in number:
Constant Magnetic Field Influence Analysis on the Development and the Salt-Resistance of Oats Sprouts Avena sativa L
Authors:
Belliustin N.S., Sukhov V.S., Savel-ev , V.Yu., Golovanova N.N., Kamensky G.G.
Abstract:
The influence of oats dry seeds processing of constant magnetic field (0.02 T, exposition - 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 h) on development of plants (parts of germination roots and shoots and theirs lengths after 5 and 8 days) and influence such processing on stability of growth processes in this plants (dispersion of lengths of roots and shoots) were investigated. Also, influence of constant magnetic field on salt-tolerance (part of plant, which maintained turgor after 60 min in saturated solution of NaCl) of oats was investigated in this article.  It was shown that seeds processing of constant magnetic field (2 h) decreased part of germination roots and shoots and growth processes. Others expositions induced lowering of such characteristic too or induced faint increase (length of shoot, 5 day).  Salt-tolerance of oats, acted constant magnetic field was increased (2 h exposition).  It was proposed that shown phenomenon were connected with lowering of stability of processes in oats, which was induced of magnetic field. It was shown that processing of seeds of magnetic field increased dispersion of roots shoots lengths in oats. In control was shown that there was positive correlation between standard derivation of shoots lengths and salt-tolerance. Also, increase of standard derivation induced lowering of roots and shoots lengths, with the exception two-phase dependence for shoots length after 5 day.  Such results show that destabilization of processes in living system can take part in realization of constant magnetic field influence on development and tolerance of plant. Mathematical model of investigated processes was elaborated and used for theoretical analysis. Numerical analysis of model showered that increase of fluctuation level in system can induced one-, two- and three phases change of tolerance of described mathematical model object and lowering of growth processes in it. Such results are quality correlated with experiment and show that elaborated model can be used for understanding of constant magnetic field effects.
Pages: 42
References
  1. Бинги В.Н., Савин А.В. Физические проблемы действия слабых магнитных полей на биологические системы. - Успехи физических наук, 2003, т. 173, № 3, с. 265 - 300.
  2. Aksenov S.I., Grunina T.Iu., Goriachev S.N. Characteristics of low frequency magnetic field effect on swelling of wheat seeds at various stages. - Biofisics., 2001, vol. 46, pp. 1127 - 32.
  3. Aladjadjiyan A. Study of the influence of magnetic field on some biological characteristics of Zea mais. - J. Central European Agriculture, 2002, vol. 3, pp. 89 - 94.
  4. Aladjadjiyan A., Ylieva T. Influence of stationary magnetic field on the early stages of the development of tobacco seeds (Nicotiana tabacum L.). - J. Central European Agriculture, 2003, vol. 4, pp. 131 - 138.
  5. Criveanu H.R., Taralunga G. Influence of magnetic fields of variable intensity on behavior of some medicinal plants. - J. Central European Agriculture, 2006, vol. 7, pp. 643 - 648.
  6. Racuciu M., Calugaru G.H., Creanga D.E. Static magnetic field influence on some plant growth. - Rom. J. Phys., 2006, vol. 51, pp. 245 - 251.
  7. Fischer G., Tausz M., Kock M., Grill D. Effects of weak 16 3/2 Hz magnetic fields on growth parameters of young sunflower and wheat seedlings. - Bioelectromagnetics, 2004, vol. 25, pp. 638 - 641.
  8. Kobayashi M., Soda N., Miyo T., Ueda Y. Effects of combined DC and AC magnetic fields on germination of hornwort seeds. - Bioelectromagnetics, 2004, vol. 25, pp. 552 - 559.
  9. Piskors-Binczycka B., Fiema J., Novak M. Effect of the magnetic field on the biological clock in Penicillium clavioforme. - Act. Biol. Cracoviensia Series Botanica., 2003, vol. 45, pp. 111 - 116.
  10. Pazur A., Rassadina V., Dandler J., Zoller J. Growth of etiolated barley plants in weak static and 50 Hz electromagnetic fields tuned to calcium ion cyclotron resonance. - BioMagn. Res. Technol., 2006, vol. 4 (1).
  11. Савельев В.Ю., Сухов В.С., Каменский Г.Г., Шемагин В.А. Анализ влияния постоянного магнитного поля на развитие и солеустойчивость проростков овса (Avena sativa L.). - Межвуз. сб. «Естествознание и гуманизм» / Под ред. проф. Н.Н. Ильинских. - Томск, 2007, т. 4, № 3, с. 114 - 115.
  12. Paul A.-L., Ferl R.J., Meisel M.V. High magnetic field induced changes of gene expression in Arabidopsis. - BioMagn. Res. Technol., 2006,vol. 4 (7)
  13. Yano A., Ohashi Y., Hirasaki T., Fujiwara K. Effects of a 60 Hz magnetic field on photosynthetic CO2 uptake and early growth of radish seedlings. - Bioelectromagnetics, 2004, vol. 25, pp. 572 - 581.
  14. Alikamanoglu S. , Yaycılı O., Atak C., Rzakoulieva A. Effect of magnetic field and gamma radiation on Paulowinia tomentosa tissue culture. - Biotechnol. & Biotechnol. EQ, 2007, vol. 21, pp. 49 - 53.
  15. Sahebjamei H., Abdolmaleki P., Ghanati F. Effects of magnetic field on the antioxidant enzyme activities of suspension-cultured tobacco cells. - Bioelectromagnetics, 2006, vol. 28, pp. 42 - 47.
  16. Atak C., Emirolu O., Alikamanolu S., Rzakoulieva A. Stimulation of regeneration by magnetic field in soybean (Glycine max L. Merrill) tissue cultures. - J. Cell Mol. Biol., 2003, vol. 2, pp. 113 - 119.
  17. Reina F.G., Pascual L.A., Fundora I.A. Influence of a stationary magnetic field on water relations in lettuce seeds. Part II: experimental results. - Bioelectromagnetics, 2001, vol. 22, pp. 596 - 602.
  18. Pazur A. Characterisation of weak magnetic field effects in an aqueous glutamic acid solution by nonlinear dielectric spectroscopy and voltammetry. - BioMagn. Res. Technol., 2004, vol. 2 (8).
  19. Galland P., Pazur A. Magnetoreception in plants. - J. Plant Res., 2005, vol. 118, pp. 371 - 389.
  20. Reina F.G., Pascual L.A. Influence of a stationary magnetic field on water relations in lettuce seeds. Part I: theoretical considerations. - Bioelectromagnetics, 2001, vol. 22, pp. 589 - 595.
  21. Belova N.A., Lednev V.V. Activation and inhibition of the gravitropic response in the flax stem segments exposed to the permanent magnetic field with magnetic density ranging from 0 to 350 microT. - Biofisics., 2001, vol. 46, pp. 118 - 121.
  22. Савельев В.Ю., Каменский Г.Г., Шемагин В.А., Якутов С.В. Особенности развития зародышей большого прудовика (Lymnaea stagnalis L.) в постоянном магнитном поле. - Межвуз. сб. «Естествознание и гуманизм» / Под ред. проф. Н.Н. Ильинских. - Томск, 2006, т. 3, № 3, с. 17 - 18.
  23. Савельев В.Ю., Каменский Г.Г., Шемагин В.А. Якутов С.В. Особенности развития некоторых видов жуков в постоянных магнитных полях. - Межвуз. сб. «Естествознание и гуманизм» / Под ред. проф. Н.Н. Ильинских. - Томск, 2007, т. 4, № 2, с. 117 - 119.
  24. Xia L., Guo J. Effect of magnetic field on peroxidase activation and isozyme in Leymus chinensis. - Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao., 2000, vol. 11, pp. 699 - 702.
  25. Коросов А.В. Имитационное моделирование в среде MS Excel. - Петрозаводск: Из-во ПетрГУ, 2002.
  26. Веселова Т.В., Веселовский В.А., Чернавский Д.С. Стресс у растений (биофизический подход). - М.:  Изд-во МГУ, 1993.
  27. Пятыгин С.С., Орлова О.В., Мысягин С.А. Надежность и реактивность биологических систем. - Н. Новгород: Изд-во ННГУ, 2006.
  28. Лакин Г.Ф. Биометрия. - М.: Высш. шк., 1973.
  29. Кузнецов В.В., Дмитриева Г.А. Физиология растений. - М.: Высш. шк., 2006.
  30. Вольтера. Математическая теория борьбы за существование. - М.: Наука, 1976.
  31. Свирежев Ю.М., Логофет Д.О. Устойчивость биологических сообществ. - М.: Наука, 1978.
  32. Свирежев Ю.М. Нелинейные волны, диссипативные структуры и катастрофы в экологии. - М.: Наука, 1987.
  33. Беллюстин Н.С. Пример математической модели эпидемиологической обстановки. - Межвуз. сб. «Динамика биологических популяций». - Горький: Изд-во ГГУ, 1988, с.95 - 99.
  34. Беллюстин Н.С. Простейшая модель пандемии СПИДа. - Межвуз. сб. «Динамика биологических популяций». - Горький: Изд-во ГГУ, 1989, с.97 - 102.
  35. Беллюстин Н.С., Шевц Р.Л. - Журнал микробиологии и иммунологии, 1991, № 2, с.27 - 30.