V.S. Verba1, V.I. Merkulov2, D.V. Zakomoldin3, V.P. Likhachev4

1,2 JSC «Concern «Vega» (Moscow, Russia)

3 Military Academy of Aerospace Defense named after Marshal of the Soviet Union G.K. Zhukov (Tver, Russia)

4 Military Educational and Scientific Center of the Air Force Air Force Academy named after professor N.E. Zhukovsky and Yu.A. Gagarin (Voronezh, Russia)

1 vvs.msk@gmail.com, 2 ilya zagrebelnyi@mail.ru, 3 denjuga68@yandex.ru, 4 lvp_home@mail.ru

The demand for high-speed aircraft in aerospace warfare systems is due not only to their high flight speeds, but also to the ability to perform spatial maneuvers. The combination of these properties greatly complicates the procedure for intercepting them. In this regard, it is very relevant to study the influence of the trajectory features of high-speed aircraft on the effectiveness of various stages of the operation of interception systems.

The purpose of the article is to analyze the influence of flight trajectories of high-speed aircraft on the stages of primary and secondary signal processing and guidance errors.

Based on the results of the analysis, directions for improving high-speed aircraft interception systems were substantiated, which made it possible to develop recommendations at a qualitative level for optimizing the main stages of the operation of high-speed aircraft interception systems.

Verba V.S., Merkulov V.I., Zakomoldin D.V., Likhachev V.P. Problems of interception of high speed aircraft maneuvering according to complex laws. Part 2. Analysis of flight paths of foreign aircraft. Achievements of modern radioelectronics. 2024. V. 78. № 4. P. 5–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18127/j20700784-202404-01 [in Russian]

1. Verba V.S., Merkulov V.I., Zakomoldin D.V. Problems of interception of high speed aircraft maneuvering according to complex laws. Part 1. Features of the use of high speed aircraft, complicating their interception. Achievements of modern radioelectronics. 2024. V. 78. № 3. P. 5–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18127/j20700784-202403-01 [in Russian]
2. Ding Y., Wang X., Bai Y. et al. An improved continuous sliding mode controller for flexible air breathing hypersonic vehicle. Journal Robust Nonlinear Control. 2020. № 30 (14). P. 5751–5772.
3. Nie W., Li H., Zhang R. Model-free adaptive optimal design for trajectory tracking control of rocket powered vehicle. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics. 2020. № 33 (6). P. 1703–1716.
4. Chen B., Liu Y., Shen H. et al. Performance limitations in trajectory tracking control for air breathing hypersonic vehicle. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics. 2019. № 32(1). P. 167–175.
5. Ding Yibo, Xiaokui YUE, Guangshan CHEN, Jiashun Si. Review of control and guidance technology on hypersonic vehicle. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics. 2022. № 35(7). P. 1–18.
6. Besser H.-L. et al. Hypersonic Vehicles: Game Changers for Future Warfare? Transforming Joint Air Power: The Journal of the JAPCC. 2017. № 24. P. 11–27.
7. Michael J Grant, Thomas Antony Rapid indirect trajectory optimization of a hypothetical long range weapon system. In AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference. 2016.
8. Sun JG., Song SM. Tracking Control of Hypersonic Vehicles with Input Saturation Based on Fast Terminal Sliding Mode. Journal of Aeronautics. Space Sci. 2019. № 20. P. 493–505.
9. Dolvin High Speed Flight Research Insight Briefing delivered at: USAF AFOSR RTA Program Review. USAF Arnold Engineering Development Center Tennessee, USA; High Speed Systems Division Aerospace Systems Directorate Air Force Research Laboratory. 2015. № 7.
10. Bolender, Michael A. et al. Hifire 6: Overview and Status Update 2014. 20th AIAA International Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies Conference (AIAA 2015-3537).
11. Shen H., Liu Y., Chen B. et al. Control-relevant modeling and performance limitation analysis for flexible air-breathing hyper-sonic vehicles. Aerospace Scinse Technology 2018. № 76. P. 340–349.
12. Li R., Xia Q., Wen Q. Extended optimal guidance law with impact angle and acceleration constriants. Journal System Engeneering Electronica. 2014. 25(5). C. 868 – 876.
13. Tang Y., Zhu X., Zhou Z. et al. Two-phase guidance law for impact time control under physical constraints. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics. 2020. № 33 (11). P. 2946–2958.
14. Verba V.S., Merkulov V.I., Plyashechnik A.S. Soglasovannoe upravlenie raznoudalennymi letatel'nymi apparatami s zadannoy vremennoy rasstanovkoy vyvoda na dvizhushchiysya ob"ekt. Informatsionno-izmeritel'nye i upravlyayushchie sistemy. 2015. № 8. S. 50–57. [in Russian]
15. Aviatsionnye sistemy radioupravleniya. T.3. sistemy komandnogo navedeniya. Avtonomnye i kombinirovannye sistemy navedeniya. Pod red. A.I. Kanashchenkova i V.I. Merkulova. M.: Radiotekhnika. 2004. [in Russian]
16. Il'chuk A.R., Merkulov V.I., Samarin O.F., Yurchik I.A. Vliyanie intensivnogo manevrirovaniya tseley na pokazateli effektivnosti sistemy pervichnoy obrabotki signalov v bortovoy RLS. Radiotekhnika. 2003. № 6. [in Russian]
17. Il'chuk A.R., Merkulov V.I., Yurchik I.A. Osobennosti obnaruzheniya signalov v bortovykh RLS pri nablyudenii intensivno manevriruyushchikh tseley. Radiotekhnika. 2004. №10. [in Russian]
18. Aviatsionnye sistemy radioupravleniya: uchebnik dlya voennykh i grazhdanskikh VUZov. Pod red. V.I. Merkulova. M.: Izd. VVIA im. prof. N.E. Zhukovskogo. 2008. [in Russian]
19. Merkulov V.I. Nestatsionarnye metody samonavedeniya. Vestnik VKO. 2020. № 1. S. 28–42. [in Russian]
20. Merkulov V.I., Verba V.S. Sintez i analiz aviatsionnykh radioelektronnykh sistem upravleniya. Kniga 2. Optimizatsiya metodov samonavedeniya i ikh informatsionnogo obespecheniya. M.: Radiotekhnika. 2023. [in Russian]
21. Ryazantsev L.B., Likhachev V.P. Otsenka dal'nosti i radial'noy skorosti ob"ektov shirokopolosnoy radiolokatsionnoy stantsiey v usloviyakh migratsii otmetok po kanalam dal'nosti. Izmeritel'naya tekhnika. 2017. № 11. S. 61–64. [in Russian]