V.V. Lisitsky1, S.G. Vorona2, A.M. Martynov3

1–3 Military Space Academy named after A.F. Mozhajskij (St. Petersburg, Russia)

Currently, one of the urgent issues arising in the operation of radar stations (radars) for various purposes is the issue of tracking complex targets, namely the case of the intersection of the trajectories of several objects of observation.

The development of principles and models of quantitative justification of requirements is one of the priorities of the decision-making procedure in improving the structure of complex technical systems (STS). The need to solve this problem is determined by some factors.

Firstly, setting requirements is the starting point, the starting position for determining the effectiveness of the functioning of the STS, since it is impossible to determine the quality of the STS if it is not known what requirements are imposed on the system and under what conditions it functions.

Secondly, the cost of an error in the formation of requirements as a starting position for improving the STS is extremely high, and this error is not eliminated either by the capabilities of the management process or by the achievements of the decision-making process. Therefore, it is absolutely fair to single out as a fundamental factor in the quality management of the system, the process of quality education, which is a procedure for the formation of requirements for the system.

Thirdly, the task of quantifying the requirements for the effectiveness of the functioning of the STS does not have a formalized solution.

The known approaches have a fundamental disadvantage that they allow us to predict the requirements for individual properties of the system, and it is necessary to justify at the same time the entire set of requirements as a single whole, as an interconnected and interdependent system. These circumstances determine the need for research from a single position of a systematic approach of the whole complex of issues of a quantitatively justified assignment of requirements to the system being improved.

Lisitsky V.V., Vorona S.G., Martynov A.M. Polymodel complex of presenting quality requirements to a complex technical system at various stages of the life cycle. Achievements of modern radioelectronics. 2022. V. 76. № 10. P. 22–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18127/ j20700784-202210-02 [in Russian]

1. Azgal'dov G.G., Bereza T.N. Ob uchete kategorii kachestva pri vychislenii sravnitel'noy effektivnosti ob"ektov. Ekonomika i matematicheskie metody. 1996. T. 32. V. 3. [in Russian]
2. Ayzerman M.A., Aleskerov F.T. Vybor variantov: osnovy teorii. M.: Nauka. 1990. [in Russian]
3. Andreychikov A.V., Andreychikova O.N. Analiz, sintez, planirovanie resheniy v ekonomike. M.: Finansy i statistika. 1999. [in Russian]
4. Burenok V.M., Lyapunov V.M., Mudrov V.I. Teoriya vooruzheniya: Ucheb. posobie. Pod red. A.A. Rakhmanova. M.: 46 TsNII MO. 2002. [in Russian]
5. Bellman R., Zade L. Prinyatie resheniy v rasplyvchatykh usloviyakh. Voprosy analiza i protsedury prinyatiya resheniy: Per. s angl. M.: Mir. 1976. S. 17–215. [in Russian]
6. Sokolov B.V. i dr. Voennaya sistemotekhnika i sistemnyy analiz. Modeli i metody podgotovki i prinyatiya resheniy v slozhnykh organizatsionno-tekhnicheskikh kompleksakh v usloviyakh neopredelennosti i mnogokriterial'nosti. Pod red. d-ra tekhn. nauk prof. B.V. Sokolova. SPb.: VIKU im. A.F. Mozhayskogo. 1999. [in Russian]
7. Zhuk P.I. Opredelenie strukturnykh parametrov slozhnykh system. Kibernetika. 1987. № 3. S. 114–119. [in Russian]
8. Pyt'ev Yu.P. Vozmozhnost' kak al'ternativa veroyatnosti. Matematicheskie i empiricheskie osnovy, primenenie. M.: Fizmatlit. 2007. [in Russian]
9. Vorona S.G., Khrestinin D.V., Pokora A.F. Expert systems in automated realtime systems. Achievements of modern radioelectronics. 2020. V. 74. № 8. P. 40–47. DOI: 10.18127/j20700784-202008-04. [in Russian]