Article or book title, author's surname, DOI

СHARACTERISTICS OF INTERVERTEBRAL DISC-BASED COMPUTER ANALYSIS

N.E. Komleva1, V.V. Bakutkin2, A.A. Maryanovsky3

research article Pages: 11-14

  1. 1 к.м.н., руководитель клинического отдела, ФБУН Саратовский НИИ сельской гигиены Роспотребнадзора
  2. 2 д.м.н., профессор, вед. науч. сотрудник, клинический отдел, ФБУН Саратовский НИИ сельской гигиены Роспотребнадзора
  3. 3 д.м.н., профессор, ГОУ ВПО РГМУ им. Н.И. Пирогова (Москва)

Abstract

The prevalence of discogenic disease is high. This makes the study of the state of the intervertebral discs. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) - a basic method for studying intervertebral disc. Assessment of the intervertebral discs and presented subjective quality indicators.

We have developed a method that carries out a computer analysis of digital images of spinal MRI for the assessment of intervertebral discs. This method gives a quantitative assessment of in-tervertebral discs.

Intervertebral discs were examined by gender and age. To this end, selected 212 micro-images of intervertebral discs of the lumbosacral spine. Of these, 101 belonged to drive to males, 110 - person female. The exceptions were low-quality discs. Compared the values of the average brightness level of the intervertebral discs of men and women. Statistically significant difference was not detected (p = 0,06).

Compared the patients' age and the average degree of brightness of intervertebral discs L1-L2 to L4-L5 (nonparametric method of Spearman correlation analysis). An inverse statistically signifi-cant moderate correlation (r = - 0,50; p = 0,001).

Intervertebral disc L5-S1 is an exception. Studied the intervertebral discs of the lumbosacral spine. The correlation between the average brightness level of L1-L2 to L4-L5. Intervertebral disc

L5-S1 is an exception.

Were identified an average level of brightness, standard deviation, median and confidence in-tervals for the age groups. Proved statistically significant difference between all age groups. Estab-lished neuroimaging characteristics of intervertebral disc spine.

How to cite

Комлева Н.Е., Бакуткин В.В., Марьяновский А.А. ХАРАКТЕРИСТИКИ МЕЖПОЗВОНКОВЫХ ДИСКОВ НА ОСНОВЕ КОМПЬЮТЕРНОГО АНАЛИЗА // Технологии живых систем. 2011. № 5. С. 11–14.

References
  1. Кукушкин М. Л. Патофизиологические механизмы болевых синдромов // Боль. 2003. №1. С. 5 - 13.
  2. Левин О.С. Диагностика и лечение неврологических проявлений остеохондроза позвоночника // Консилиум. 2004. Т. 6. № 8. С. 547 - 554.
  3. Хоружик С.А., Полойко Ю.Ф. Алгоритмы медицинской визуализации: скелетно-мышечная
    система // Новости лучевой диагностики. 2000. № 2. С. 19 - 21.
  4. Fardon D.F., Milette P.C. Nomenclature and Classification of Lumbar disk pathology // Spine. 2001. №5. P. 93 - 113.
  5. Roberts S. Disc morphology in health and disease // Biochemical Society Transactions. 2002. №30. Р. 864 - 869.