350 rub
Journal Technologies of Living Systems №1 for 2021 г.
Article in number:
Method of electrochemical biotesting applied to comparative analysis of antimicrobial properties of various essential oils
DOI: 10.18127/j20700997-202101-06
UDC: 615, 614.35, 547.9, 57.044, 57.083.1, 543.95, 543.
Authors:

V.S. Sibirtsev¹, U.Yu. Nechiporenko²  

1 Saint Petersburg State Chemical and Pharmaceutical University (St.-Petersburg, Russia)

2 All-Russia Research Institute for Food Additives (St.-Petersburg, Russia)

Abstract:

Recently, in pharmaceutical, cosmetic, food, feed and other products produced and consumed by the human society, there is an increasing lack of biologically active substances (BAS) of natural origin, one of the most acceptable and widespread sources of which are various plant extracts. In addition, the problem of developing sufficiently objective and at the same time rapid and widely applicable methods for quantitative assessment of pro- and antibiotic properties, as well as microbiological contamination of a large number of samples, both new and already approved for use, is becoming increasingly urgent. In this regard, in this work, a new instrumental method was developed for assessing pro- and antibiotic properties, as well as microbiological contamination of samples of various pharmaceutical, cosmetic, food, feed and other products, as well as individual ingredients and additives to them. This technique provides for periodic (every 2 h) recording of changes in pH, redox potential, and electrical conductivity of a liquid nutrient test medium (TM) incubated in the presence and absence of viable test microorganisms (TM) and test samples (TS). Then, using this method, a comparative analysis of pro- and antibiotic activity against Lactobacillus acidophilus (typical representatives of useful microflora, widespread both outside and inside the human body and other warm-blooded animals, in addition, widely used by humans in many biotechnological processes) different concentrations of "essential oils" (EO) obtained from 10 different types of plant materials (such as leaves, stems, flowers, etc. Méntha piperíta, Mentha arvensis, Oríganum vulgares, Thymus serpyllum, Melissa officinalis, Rosmarinus officinalis, Jasminum grandiflorum, Tagetes patula, Valeriana officinalis and Allium sativum). Studies have shown that among TS, the most active prolonged antibiotic properties against TM were exhibited by EO obtained from Allium sativum bulbs, Jasminum grandiflorum flowers, Oríganum vulgares herb and Tagetes patula flowers. The initial biological activity of TS in most cases was greater than their prolonged activity. At the same time, the medium-term (in terms of the time of interaction between TO and TM) antibiotic activity of TS was, as a rule, intermediate in magnitude between their initial and prolonged activity. Thus, it is obvious that the biological activity of products, including plant extracts, is largely determined by the choice of not only the raw material and the method of extracting BAS from it, but also the concentration of the extract in the product. Moreover, the exact nature of these dependencies in most cases can be established only empirically, with the help of a significant number of tests. And the latter can be conveniently carried out using the methodology presented in this work, which makes it possible to assess microbiological contamination, as well as the effect on the dynamics of the vital activity of microorganisms as various samples of pharmaceutical, cosmetic, food, feed and other products, as well as individual ingredients and additives to it, much more quickly, objectively and informatively, as well as significantly less laborious and material-intensive than using standard visual microbiological methods.

Pages: 58-66
For citation

Sibirtsev V.S., Nechiporenko U.Yu. Method of electrochemical biotesting applied to comparative analysis of antimicrobial properties of various essential oils. Technologies of living systems. 2021. V. 18. № 1. P. 58–66. DOI: 10.18127/j20700997202101-06 (In Russian).

References
  1. Sutherland J., Miles M., Hedderley D., Li J., Devoy S., Sutton K., Lauren D. Invitroeffects of food extracts on selected probiotic and pathogenic bacteria. International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition. 2009. V. 60. № 8. Р. 717–727. https://doi.org/10.3109/09637480802165650.
  2. Das S., Anjeza C., Mandal S. Synergistic or additive antimicrobial activities of Indian spice and herbal extracts against pathogenic, probiotic and food–spoiler micro-organisms. International Food Research Journal. 2012. V. 19. № 3. Р. 1185–1191.
  3. Al-Zubairi A., Al-Mamary M. A., Al-Ghasani E. The antibacterial, antifungal, and antioxidant activities of essential oil from different aromatic plants. Global Advanced Research Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences. 2017. V. 6. № 9. Р. 224–233. http://garj.org/garjmms.
  4. Rodino S., Butu M. Functional and Medicinal Beverages. V. 11: The Science of Beverages. Academic Press. 2019. P. 73–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-816397-9.00003-0.
  5. Bakkali F., Averbeck S., Averbeck D., Idaomar M. Biological effects of essential oils – a review. Food and chemical toxicology. 2008.  V. 46. № 2. Р. 446–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2007.09.106.
  6. Sutherland J., Miles M., Hedderley D., Li J., Devoy S., Sutton K., Lauren D. Invitroeffects of food extracts on selected probiotic and pathogenic bacteria. International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition. 2009. V. 60. № 8. Р. 717–727. https://doi.org/10.3109/09637480802165650.
  7. Donsì F., Ferrari G. Essential oil nanoemulsions as antimicrobial agents in food. Journal of Biotechnology. 2016. V. 233. P. 106–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2016.07.005.
  8. Ju J., Xie Y., Guo Y., Cheng Y., Qian H., Yao W. Application of edible coating with essential oil in food preservation. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. 2019. V. 59. № 15. P. 2467–2480. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2018.1456402.
  9. Sibirtsev V.S. Study of applicability of the bifunctional system “Ethidium bromide + Hoechst-33258” for DNA analysis. Biochemistry (Moscow). 2005. V. 70. № 4. P. 449–457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10541-005-0136-x.
  10. Sibirtsev V.S. Fluorescent DNA probes: study of mechanisms of changes in spectral properties and features of practical application. Biochemistry (Moscow). 2007. V. 72. № 8. P. 887–900.   
  11. Sibirtsev V.S., Naumov I.A., Kuprina E.E., Olekhnovich R.O. Use of impedance biotesting to assess the actions of pharmaceutical compounds on the growth of microorganisms. Pharmaceutical Chemistry Journal. 2016. V. 50. № 7. P. 481–485. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11094-0161473-3.
  12. Sibirtsev V.S. Biological test methods based on fluorometric genome analysis. Journal of Optical Technology. 2017. V. 84. № 11. P. 787–791. https://doi.org/10.1364/JOT.84.000787.
  13. Sibirtsev V.S., Maslova A.Yu. Complex research of E.coli vital activity dynamics in presence of transition metal ions. Scientific and Technical Journal of Information Technologies. Mechanics and Optics. 2019. V. 19. № 2. P. 236–241. https://doi.org/10.17586/22261494-2019-19-2-236-241.
  14. Sibirtsev V.S., Uspenskaya M.V., Garabadgiu A.V., Shvets V.I. An integrated method of instrumental microbiotesting of environmental safety of various products, wastes, and territories. Doklady Biological Sciences. 2019. V. 485. № 1. Р. 59–61. https://doi.org/10.1134/S001249661902011X.
  15. Sibirtsev V.S., Garabadgiu A.V., Shvets V.I. New technique for integrated photofluorescence microbiotesting. Doklady Biological Sciences, 2019, V. 489. № 6. Р. 196–199. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0012496619060103.
  16. Korn G., Korn T. Mathematical Handbook for Scientists and Engineers. Definitions, Theorems and Formulas for Reference and Review. McGraw_Hill Book Company. 1968. 
  17. Johnson K., Jeffi V. Numerical Methods in Chemistry. New York: Cambridge University Press. 1983.
  18. Sibirtsev V.S. Analysis of benzo[a]pyrene deactivation mechanisms in rats. Biochemistry (Moscow). 2006. V. 71. № 1. P. 90–98. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0006297906010147.
Date of receipt: 19.09.2020
Approved after review: 21.11.2020
Accepted for publication: 25.12.2020