350 rub
Journal Technologies of Living Systems №7 for 2016 г.
Article in number:
Assessments of influence of acoustic impact on students - psycho-functional condition
Authors:
M.Yu. Pitkevich - Post-Graduator, Department of Forensic Ecology and Course Human Ecology, Ecology Faculty, Peoples - Friendship University of Russia, Moscow E-mail: asklepiya@gmail.com V.V. Glebov - Ph.D. (Psych.), Associate Professor, Department of Forensic Ecology and Course Human Ecology, Ecology Faculty, Peoples - Friendship University of Russia, Moscow E-mail: vg44@mail.ru I.V. Radysh - Dr.Sc. (Med.), Professor, Academician REA,тHead of Department of Management of Nursing Activities, Peoples - Friendship University of Russia, Moscow E-mail: iradysh@mail.ru A.Ya. Chizhov - Dr.Sc. (Med.), Professor, Department of Forensic Ecology of Ecological Faculty, Peoples - Friendship University of Russia, Moscow E-mail: ma21@mail.ru
Abstract:
The article is devoted to the study of the noise impact of noise on psycho-functional state students. The 122 healthy volunteers students aged 18 to 20 years, including 64 girls and 58 boys were examined. The levels of noise exposure measured in a variety of areas: in lecture halls, auditoriums, where the practical training of students in the halls, corridors and the library for a week from 9-00 to 17-00 hours, use the instrument sound level meter First Class \"Ekofizika-110A\". To identify the subjective noise ratio of students conducted a survey. The study revealed no significant relationship between the level of noise on the room size. There were also no significant differences between the number, sex and age, and are present in the classroom noise level measurement. Thus, the data show a trend towards an increase in the noise level from the beginning to the end of the session, from the 1st to the 4th pair, and from Monday to Friday. This was no significant relationship between the level of noise during training sessions, the number of people sex, age and space parameters. It was found that the average noise level in the classroom, where classes are held with students is 68 dB, ie exceeds the permitted limit of about 1.7 times.
Pages: 65-69
References

 

  1. Krasilnikov V.A. Vvedenie v akustiku. M.: Izd-vo MGU. 1992. 152 s.
  2. Glebov V.V., Mikhajjlichenko K.JU., CHizhov A.JA. Psikhofiziologicheskaja adaptacija populjacii cheloveka k uslovijam megapolisa: Monografija. M.: RUDN. 2013. 325 s.
  3. Kulieva G.A., Glebov V.V., Lunev D.V., Kochanova M.A. Specocenka uslovijj truda muzykantov orkestrovykh grupp // Mir nauki, kultury, obrazovanija. 2015. № 5(54). S. 242-245.
  4. Stepanova M.I. Berezhem li my slukh - // Obrazovanie. 2003. № 8. S. 30-33.
  5. Golenko T.P., Fisenko T.R. Issledovanie zvukovykh voln i ikh vlijanie na cheloveka i na vkus pishhi // Sb. nauch. trudov «Nauchnaja integracija». 2016. S. 469-472.
  6. Rodionova O.M., Glebov V.V. Lekcii po disciplinam «EHkologicheskaja fiziologija» i «Biologija cheloveka» [Tekst]: Ucheb. posobie v 2-kh ch. CH.1. M.: RUDN. 2013. 92 s.
  7. Ivashhenko O.N., Altukhova A.O. Akusticheskijj shum i ego vozdejjstvie na cheloveka //Nauka i sovremennost. 2010. № 4-2. S. 26-29.
  8. Romanchuk I.A., Romanchuk A.A. Dinamika urovnja shuma vo vremja uchebnykh zanjatijj studentov GOU VPO «Kemerovskijj gosudarstvennyjj universitet» // Bjulleten Vostochno-Sibirskogo nauchnogo centra SO RAMN. 2008. № 2. S. 118-120.