350 rub
Journal Technologies of Living Systems №6 for 2010 г.
Article in number:
DISEASE OF DIGESTION IN THE RURAL WITH THE DIAGNOSIS DORSOPATIYA
Authors:
N.E. Komleva, A.A. Maryanovsky, V.F. Spirin, I.V. Zaikina
Abstract:
Dorsopaty problem is particularly relevant for rural residents, which are prone to occupational exposures. We observed 160 patients (57 % men and 43 % of women) Clinic of Occupational Dis-eases FSIS Saratov NIISG Rospotrebnadzor from 20 to 69 years with a diagnosis dorsopatiya. All patients were residents of rural areas. A detailed analysis of the attention is drawn to the fact of a high occurrence in patients with dorsopatiey digestive diseases (54,5%, p <0,05), which also are very common in populations of people. When you turn into the complex therapy of NSAIDs in 128 out of 160 patients (80,0%) noted the appearance of complaints gastroenterological nature. Analysis of complaints and anamnestic data of patients somatic hospital departments and clinics revealed that the prevalence dorsopaty among rural residents (78,4%) higher than the population figures, the average sampling frequency which is 43,9±1,4% for the population over 17 years old. To establish the intensity of pain and severity of lesions of the digestive system were the following groups. Group I consisted of patients with established disease, related to functional dis-turbances, Group II - patients with digestive diseases, characterized by the presence of structural. The comparison group included study participants with a diagnosis dorsopatiya without exacer-bation, which did not have digestive diseases, gastroenterological complaints nature absent or were minor. In order to analyze the intensity of pain, the influence of pain on self-care and social activity in all patients used the «Osvestrovsky questionnaire for assessing violations of life with back pain». For patients in group I Oswestry index was equal to 32,7±3,2%, II group - 48,1±2,7%, control group - 20,2±4,3%. To build a contingency table and determine the χ2 test with the condition of preservation conditions Cochran, we ranked indicator Oswestry - up to 45% and 45%. The highest level of Oswestry index in patients of Group II diseases OP, characterized by the presence of structural changes (p<0,001). The analysis was found a direct correlation (Spearman, r=0,55, p<0,05) between the value of Oswestry, reflecting the degree of pain and diseases of the digestive system. So, analysis of epidemiological and clinical data suggesting a high prevalence of digestive diseases in patients with a diagnosis dorsopatiya. One of the characteristics of the combined flow of these diseases is their multiplicity, which has a value independent factor for assessing the course and prognosis of the disease. Revealed a direct correlation between the intensity of pain caused by dorsopatiey and severity of functional disturbances and structural changes of the digestive system causes the active detection among this category of patients with diseases of the digestive system to provide timely preventive measures.
Pages: 24-28
References
  1. Андриянова Е.Ю. Анализ патогенетических и этиологических факторов остеохондроза позвоночника // Сб. трудов кафедры медико-биологических дисциплин ВЛГАФК. Великие Луки. 2002. С. 12-19.
  2. Григорьева В.Н., Белова А.Н. Вертеброгенные поражения нервной системы. / В кн.: Нейрореабилитация. М.: АОЗТ «Антидор». 2000.
    С. 449-562.
  3. Звенигородская Л.А., Самсонова Н.Г. Хроническая ишемическая болезнь органов пищеварения: варианты клинического течения, диагностики, лечения.// Экспериментальная и клини­ческая гастроэнтерология. 2007. № 2. С. 74-79.
  4. Крылов А.А. К проблеме сочетанности заболеваний // Клиническая медицина. 2001. № 1.  С. 56-58.
  5. Кукушкин М.Л., Хитров Н.К. Общая патология боли. М.: Медицина. 2004. 141с.
  6. Лазебник Л.Б., Дроздов В.Н. Генез полиморбидности // Клиническая геронтология. 2001.  №1-2. С. 3-5.
  7. Насонова В.А. Боль в нижней части спины - большая медицинская и социальная проблема, методы лечения // Consilium medicum. 2004. V. 6. № 8. С. 536-541.
  8. Пиманов С.И., Силивончик Н.Н. Римский III Консенсус: избранные разделы и комментарии. Пособие для врачей. Витебск: Изд-во ВГМУ. 2006. 160 с.

  9. Радыш Б.Б., Кутенев А.В., Анашкина Л.А.Особенности купирования болевого синдрома при вертеброгенных кардиалгиях у лиц старших возрастных групп. // Материалы VIII всеросс. общества неврологов. Казань. 2001. С. 121-122.
  10. Шмидт И.Р.Остеохондроз позвоночника. Этиология и профилактика. Новосибирск. 1992. 240 с.
  11. Чернин В.В., Осадчий В.А.  Клинико-патогенетические особенности рецидива язвенной болезни и острых язв при остром коронарном синдроме // Клиническая медицина. 2003. Т. 81. № 3. С. 27-32.
  12. Эльштейн Н.В. Множественность заболеваний, как одна из ключевых проблем современной гастроэнтерологии // Гастробюллетень. 2001. № 2-3. С. 99.
  13. Bogduk N. Management of chronic low back pain // MJA 2004. V. 180. P. 79-83.
  14. Devereaux M.W. Low back pain // Prim. Care Clin. Office Pract. 2004. V. 31. P. 33-51.
  15. Ehrlich G.E. Low back pain // Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2003. V.81. P. 671-676.
  16. Patijen J., Ellis R. Low back pain: reproducibility of diagnostic procedures in manual musculoskeletal medicine // J. of orthopaedic medicine. 2001. V. 23. No. 1. P. 36-42.