350 rub
Journal Science Intensive Technologies №11 for 2016 г.
Article in number:
About the methodology and model approaches to the assessment of medium-sized business enterprise risks in the electronic components import
Keywords: electronic component base methodology mathematical models risk assessment intangible assets new technologies economics environmental friendliness of production
Authors:
V.O. Fedorov - Ph. D. (Eng.), Associate Professor, Kaluga branch of the Bauman MSTU E-mail: wquolz@mail.ru S.A. Kuznetsov - Assistant, Department of Applied Economics, NUST «MIS&S» (Moscow) E-mail: kuznecov-s-a91@rambler.ru A.V. Chelenko - Post-graduate Student, Kaluga branch of the Bauman MSTU E-mail: apererva@yandex.ru N.V. Yarantsev - Ph. D. (Eng.), Head of Basic Departments of Kaluga branch of the Bauman MSTU in JSC \"VOSHOD\"-KRLZ E-mail: yarancev_nv@mail.ru
Abstract:
On the basis of modern methodologies and mathematical models of the estimates average business risks of the enterprise, performed the modernization of its tangible and intangible assets, with the primary investment of funds in the past. Such modernization is possible to create an innovative enterprise for the production of high-tech products, particularly products of electronic component base. Presents the basic methodology for the national-oriented business in Russia and basic mathematical approaches to the analysis of risks faced by the company during the development of innovative products import substitution based on existing technology, equipment and engineering and technical personnel, in the modernized enterprises of domestic electronic industry. We analyzed in detail all the risks of import products of electronic components, and the methods and techniques of control and to minimize their negative impact.
Pages: 44-49
References

 

  1. Fichter M., Sydow J. Using networks towards global labor standards - // Industrielle Beziehungen - The German Journal of Industrial Relations. 2002. № 9(4). P. 375−380.
  2. Baum J.A.C., Oliver C. Institutional linkages and organizational mortality // Administrative Science Quarterly. 1991. № 36. P. 187−218.
  3. O perspektivakh razvitija mikroehlektronnojj promyshlennosti i vnutrennego rynka. [EHlektronnyjj resurs]. http://goverment.ru/news/24073 (data obrashhenija 12.09.2016).
  4. Marin V.P., CHelenko A.V., JArancev N.V. Osnovy strukturno-ehkonomicheskojj strategii importozameshhenija vysokokachestvennojj ehlektronnojj komponentnojj bazy // Kachestvo i zhizn. 2016. T. 21. № 3. S. 53−55.
  5. SHmakov N.V. Opyt modernizacii rossijjskojj kompanii AO «Voskhod»-KRLZ // EHlektromagnitnye volny i ehlektronnye sistemy. 2016. T. 21. № 1. S. 5−8.
  6. CHelenko A.V. Rol intellektualnojj i biznes ehlity v postroenii struktury i funkcionirovanii naukoemkojj tekhnologii // Nauka, tekhnika i obrazovanie. 2015. № 3. URL = http://nto-journal.ru/issues/3/ (data obrashhenija 19.09.2016).
  7. SHmakov N.V., Korzhavyjj A.P., JArancev N.V. Reformirovanie otechestvennykh predprijatijj radioehlektronnogo profilja na primere kholdinga OAO «Voskhod»-KRLZ // Biznes i vlast. Majj−ijun 2012. S. 16−17.
  8. Belskaja E.G., Smolenskaja E.V. Aspekty realizacii komandnogo podkhoda pri formirovanii kollektiva // Sb. statejj «Razvitie regiona: socialno-ehkonomicheskie processy i kadrovaja politika» / Sost. i otv. red. A.V. Skazochkin. Kaluga: Izdatelskijj dom «EHjjdos». 2001. S. 226−236.
  9. Nemcev V.N. Rol intellektualnogo kapitala v razvitii innovacionnogo predprijatija // Upravlenie riskom. 2011. № 4. S. 9−15.
  10. Merkulov A.A. EHffektivnost upravlenija chelovecheskim kapitalom // Naukoemkie tekhnologii. 2015. T. 16. № 6. S. 58−61.
  11. Gorlacheva E.N. Matematicheskaja model ocenki riskov v processe mezhfirmennogo vzaimodejjstvija predprijatijj mashinostroitelnogo kompleksa // Izvestija vuzov. Mashinostroenie. 2008. № 8. S. 71−80.
  12. Gorlacheva E.N., Gudkov A.G., Omelchenko I.N. Voprosy upravlenija stoimostju aktivov pri mezhfirmennom vzaimodejjstvii predprijatijj mashinostroitelnogo kompleksa // Naukoemkie tekhnologii. 2011. T. 12. № 10. S. 30−40.
  13. Vasilev V.L., Nazmutdinov V.N. Predprinimatelstvo i risk v innovacionnojj ehkonomike // Upravlenie riskom. 2013. № 4(63). S. 29−35.
  14. CHelenko A.V. EHkologicheskie riski predprijatija pri realizacii importozameshhenija izdelijj ehlektronnojj komponentnojj bazy. URL = http://nto-journal.ru/uploads/articles/b41aa889515efc18f8c0300f329a2aef.pdf.
  15. Aitov R.D., Bondarenko G.G., Korzhavyjj A.P. Model poslerazrjadnojj ehmissii metallicheskikh kholodnykh katodov gazorazrjadnykh priborov // Metally. 1997. № 3. S. 150−153.
  16. Bondarenko G.G., Korzhavyi A.P., Tikhonov A.N., Zhdanov S.M. Copper-aluminium compound behavior under long-termion-electron bombardment // Journal of Advanced Materials. 2001. V. 5. № 3. P. 27−37.
  17. Korzhavyjj A.P., Kristja V.I. O raspredelenii potenciala v katodnom sloe tlejushhego razrjada // ZHurnal tekhnicheskojj fiziki. 1993. T. 63. № 2. S. 200−202.
  18. Nikiforov D.K., Korzhavyjj A.P., Nikiforov K.G. Vlijanie diehlektricheskogo nanosloja na ehmissionnye svojjstva struktur Al-Al2O3 i Be-BeO // Izvestija Rossijjskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. A.I. Gercena. 2009. № 79. S. 153−159.
  19. Bondarenko G.G., Bazhin A.I., Korzhavyjj A.P., Kristja V.I., Aitov R.D. Opredelenie potenciala poverkhnosti diehlektricheskogo sloja na misheni, bombardiruemojj ionnym puchkom // ZHurnal tekhnicheskojj fiziki. 1998. T. 68. № 9. S. 126−128.