350 rub
Journal Radioengineering №12 for 2024 г.
Article in number:
Integrated optoelectronic oscillator frequency tuning based on a variable optical time delay line in a loop-back
Type of article: scientific article
DOI: 10.18127/j00338486-202412-14
UDC: 681.586.5
Authors:

V.V. Ivanov1, I.V. Stepanov2, G.S. Voronkov3, A.V. Voronkova4, E.P. Grakhova5

1–5 Ufa University of Science and Technology (Ufa, Russia)

1 ivanov.vv@ugatu.su; 2 stepanov.iv@ugatu.su; 3 voronkov.gs@ugatu.su; 4 voronkova.av@ugatu.su; 5 grakhova.ep@ugatu.su

Abstract:

An optoelectronic oscillator, a simple and cost-effective electro-optical system, is known for its ability to generate ultra-high-frequency signals with an ultra-low phase noise level. This system can produce high-frequency signals up to microwaves, often surpassing their electric analogs in these parameters. Some scientific groups have even developed optoelectronic oscillators based on integrated photonics to enhance size and mass characteristics. However, these generators do have their drawbacks, including long-term frequency instability and a significant frequency step (about tens of kilohertz). The first drawback is due to the high sensitivity of optoelectronic oscillators to environmental parameters, particularly ambient temperature. While the thermal stabilization problem of photonic integrated circuits has been addressed, stabilizing the output frequency and its control in integrated optoelectronic oscillators remains a relevant and ongoing challenge in the field.

The paper explores the potential for controlling the output frequency of an optoelectronic oscillator by adjusting the optical delay line in the feedback loop. We introduce a scheme for an optoelectronic oscillator based on the silicon-on-insulator platform and provide a mathematical model for the oscillator with a tunable optical delay line in the feedback loop. The tuning step for the output frequency is 50 MHz/ps, calculated analytically. We conducted numerical simulations using Ansys Lumerical Interconnect software to verify the mathematical model. The results show that the output frequency can be tuned in the range of 4.28 GHz, with a frequency step ranging from 30 to 60 MHz/ps. The maximum frequency deviation from the simulation is 20 MHz, approximately 0.2% of the output frequency. The obtained results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed frequency control method for various applications of the optoelectronic oscillator.

The linear mathematical model we have developed can be used to calculate the output frequency of the optoelectronic oscillator while accounting for nonlinear errors. However, creating a comprehensive mathematical model that considers the nonlinear effects of integrated photonics will require further elaboration and development in future studies.

The frequency tuning approach we have presented can be implemented using discrete optical components. However, in this case, the minimum frequency tuning step is limited by the discrete time delay in the optical delay line. On the other hand, an integrated optical delay line offers similar time delay control. This time delay tuning provides additional flexibility for controlling the output frequency within the optoelectronic oscillator eigenfrequencies, which are constrained by the frequency response of the notch filter.

Pages: 158-169
For citation

Ivanov V.V., Stepanov I.V., Voronkov G.S., Voronkova A.V., Grakhova E.P. Integrated optoelectronic oscillator frequency tuning based on a variable optical time delay line in a loop-back. Radiotekhnika. 2024. V. 88. № 12. P. 158−169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18127/j00338486-202412-14 (In Russian)

References
  1. Zhang X. et al. Reconfigurable multi-band microwave photonic radar transmitter with a wide operating frequency range. Opt. Express. 2019. V. 27. № 24. P. 34519.
  2. Zhang X. et al. Novel RF-source-free reconfigurable microwave photonic radar. Opt. Express. 2020. V. 28. № 9. P. 13650.
  3. Yao T. et al. Distributed MIMO chaotic radar based on wavelength-division multiplexing technology. Opt. Lett. 2015. V. 40. № 8. P. 1631.
  4. Zou F. et al. Optoelectronic oscillator for 5G wireless networks and beyond. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 2021. V. 54. № 42. P. 423002.
  5. Huang L. et al. Microwave photonic RF front-end for co-frequency co-time full duplex 5G communication with integrated RF signal self-interference cancellation, optoelectronic oscillator and frequency down-conversion. Opt. Express. 2019. V. 27. № 22. P. 32147.
  6. Xue Z. et al. Photonics-assisted joint radar and communication system based on an optoelectronic oscillator. Opt. Express. 2021. V. 29. № 14. P. 22442.
  7. Xue Z. et al. OFDM Radar and Communication Joint System Using Opto-Electronic Oscillator with Phase Noise Degradation Analysis and Mitigation. J. Lightwave Technol. 2022. V. 40. № 13. P. 4101–4109.
  8. Yao J. Optoelectronic Oscillators for High Speed and High Resolution Optical Sensing. J. Lightwave Technol. 2017. V. 35. № 16. P. 3489–3497.
  9. Zou X. et al. Optoelectronic Oscillators (OEOs) to Sensing, Measurement, and Detection. IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 2016. V. 52. № 1. P. 1–16.
  10. Yang D. et al. Integrated optic-fiber sensor based on enclosed EFPI and structural phase-shift for discriminating measurement of temperature, pressure and RI. Optics & Laser Technology. 2020. V. 126. P. 106112.
  11. Bogaerts W. et al. Silicon microring resonators. Laser & Photon. Rev. 2012. V. 6. № 1. P. 47–73.
  12. Grist S.M. et al. Silicon photonic micro-disk resonators for label-free biosensing. Opt. Express. 2013. V. 21. № 7. P. 7994.
  13. Voronkov G.S. et al. Enhancing the Performance of the Photonic Integrated Sensing System by Applying Frequency Interrogation. Nanomaterials. 2023. V. 13. № 1. P. 193.
  14. Wang L. et al. Microwave Photonic Temperature Sensing Based on Fourier Domain Mode-Locked OEO and Temperature-to-Time Mapping. J. Lightwave Technol. 2022. V. 40. № 15. P. 5322–5327.
  15. Zhang J. et al. High-sensitivity measurement of angular velocity based on an optoelectronic oscillator with an intra-loop Sagnac interferometer. Opt. Lett. 2018. V. 43, № 12. P. 2799.
  16. Cen Q. et al. Large-scale coherent ising machine based on optoelectronic parametric oscillator. Light Sci Appl. 2022. V. 11. № 1. P. 333.
  17. Böhm F., Verschaffelt G., Van Der Sande G. A poor man’s coherent Ising machine based on opto-electronic feedback systems for solving optimization problems. Nat Commun. 2019. V. 10. № 1. P. 3538.
  18. Chembo Y.K. Machine learning based on reservoir computing with time-delayed optoelectronic and photonic systems. Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science. 2020. V. 30. № 1. P. 013111.
  19. Tanaka G. et al. Recent advances in physical reservoir computing: A review. Neural Networks. 2019. V. 115. P. 100–123.
  20. Yao X.S., Maleki L. Optoelectronic oscillator for photonic systems. IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 1996. V. 32. № 7. P. 1141–1149.
  21. Eliyahu D., Seidel D., Maleki L. Phase noise of a high performance OEO and an ultra low noise floor cross-correlation microwave photonic homodyne system. 2008 IEEE International Frequency Control Symposium. Honolulu. HI: IEEE. 2008. P. 811–814.
  22. Hasanuzzaman G.K.M., Iezekiel S., Kanno A. W-Band Optoelectronic Oscillator. IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 2020. V. 32. № 13. P. 771–774.
  23. Hao T. et al. Recent advances in optoelectronic oscillators. Adv. Photon. 2020. V. 2. № 04. P. 1.
  24. Hao T. et al. Perspectives on optoelectronic oscillators. APL Photonics. 2023. V. 8. № 2. P. 020901.
  25. Tang J. et al. Integrated optoelectronic oscillator. Opt. Express. 2018. V. 26. № 9. P. 12257.
  26. Hao T. et al. Toward Monolithic Integration of OEOs: From Systems to Chips. J. Lightwave Technol. 2018. V. 36. № 19. P. 4565–4582.
  27. Nielsen L., Heck M.J.R. A Computationally Efficient Integrated Coupled Opto-Electronic Oscillator Model. J. Lightwave Technol. 2020. V. 38, № 19. P. 5430–5439.
  28. Han J.-Y. et al. Wideband frequency-tunable optoelectronic oscillator with a directly modulated AlGaInAs/InP integrated twin-square microlaser. Opt. Express. 2018. V. 26. № 24. P. 31784.
  29. Do P.T. et al. Wideband tunable microwave signal generation in a silicon-micro-ring-based optoelectronic oscillator. Sci Rep. 2020. V. 10. № 1. P. 6982.
  30. Wani M., Azeemuddin S. Optoelectronic Oscillator (OEO) designs: Wide-range tunable Silicon Microring resonator design and Low-noise High frequency Optical Mix Oscillator design. OSA Advanced Photonics Congress 2021. Washington. DC: Optica Publishing Group, 2021. P. JTu1A.8.
  31. Weng W. et al. Microresonator Dissipative Kerr Solitons Synchronized to an Optoelectronic Oscillator. Phys. Rev. Applied. 2022. V. 17. № 2. P. 024030.
  32. Carroll L. et al. Photonic Packaging: Transforming Silicon Photonic Integrated Circuits into Photonic Devices. Applied Sciences. 2016. V. 6. № 12. P. 426.
  33. Milanizadeh M. et al. Control and Calibration Recipes for Photonic Integrated Circuits. IEEE J. Select. Topics Quantum Electron. 2020. V. 26. № 5. P. 1–10.
  34. Ptasinski J., Khoo I.-C., Fainman Y. Passive Temperature Stabilization of Silicon Photonic Devices Using Liquid Crystals. Materials. 2014. V. 7. № 3. P. 2229–2241.
  35. O. De Aguiar D. et al. Automated tuning, control and stabilization of photonic integrated circuits / Eds. Cheben P., Čtyroký J., Molina-Fernández I. Prague. Czech Republic. 2017. P. 1024208.
  36. Zhang W., Yao J. Silicon Photonic Integrated Optoelectronic Oscillator for Frequency-Tunable Microwave Generation. Journal of Lightwave Technology. 2018. V. 36. № 19. P. 4655–4663.
  37. Jin W. et al. Hertz-linewidth semiconductor lasers using CMOS-ready ultra-high-Q microresonators. Nat. Photonics. 2021. V. 15. № 5. P. 346–353.
  38. Yang K.Y. et al. Bridging ultrahigh-Q devices and photonic circuits. Nature Photon. 2018. V. 12. № 5. P. 297–302.
  39. Zhang Y. et al. Broadband high-Q multimode silicon concentric racetrack resonators for widely tunable Raman lasers. Nat Commun. 2022. V. 13. № 1. P. 3534.
  40. Zhang M. et al. Monolithic ultra-high-Q lithium niobate microring resonator. Optica. 2017. V. 4. № 12. P. 1536.
  41. Fibre Optic Communication: Key Devices. Ed. Venghaus H., Grote N. Cham: Springer International Publishing. 2017. V. 161.
  42. Yao X.S., Maleki L. Multiloop optoelectronic oscillator. IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 2000. V. 36. № 1. P. 79–84.
  43. Poinsot S. et al. Continuous radio-frequency tuning of an optoelectronic oscillator with dispersive feedback. Opt. Lett. 2002. V. 27. № 15. P. 1300.
  44. Bluestone A. et al. An Ultra-Low Phase-Noise 20-GHz PLL Utilizing an Optoelectronic Voltage-Controlled Oscillator. IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Techn. 2015. V. 63. № 3. P. 1046–1052.
  45. Melati D. et al. Wideband Integrated Optical Delay Line Based on a Continuously Tunable Mach–Zehnder Interferometer. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics. 2018. V. 24. № 1. P. 1–8.
  46. Fedderwitz S. et al. Optoelectronic K-Band Oscillator with Gigahertz Tuning Range and Low Phase Noise. IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 2010. V. 22. № 20. P. 1497–1499.
  47. Voronkov G. et al. Design and Modeling of a Fully Integrated Microring-Based Photonic Sensing System for Liquid Refractometry. Sensors. 2022. V. 22. № 23. P. 9553.
  48. Ivanov V.V. i dr. Integral'nyj optojelektronnyj oscilljator v prilozhenijah svjazi i sensornyh sistem. Opticheskij zhurnal. Т. 90. № 12. S. 3–13 (in Russian).
  49. Chew S.X. et al. Optoelectronic Oscillator Based Sensor Using an On-Chip Sensing Probe. IEEE Photonics J. 2017. V. 9. № 2. P. 1–9.
  50. Feng D. et al. Enhancing sensitivity of trace copper detection based on coupled optoelectronic oscillator. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical. 2024. V. 370. P. 115231.
  51. Ahmadfard F., Hosseini S.E. Design and simulation of a tunable parity-time symmetric optoelectronic oscillator utilizing integrated components. Sci. Rep. 2024. V. 14. № 1. P. 16014.
  52. Peng H. et al. High sensitivity microwave phase noise analyzer based on a phase locked optoelectronic oscillator. Opt. Express. 2019. V. 27. № 13. P. 18910.
  53. Jiang C., Chen F., Yi Xi K. A novel tunable optoelectronic oscillator based on a photonic RF phase shifter. Optoelectron. Lett. 2013. V. 9. № 6. P. 446–448.
  54. Stepanov I.V. et al. Photonic integrated circuit model for phased antenna array beam steering. Optical Technologies for Telecommunications 2022. Еds. Bourdine A.V., Morozov O.G., Sultanov A.H. Ufa. Russian Federation: SPIE. 2023. P. 34.
  55. Melati D. et al. Wideband Integrated Optical Delay Line Based on a Continuously Tunable Mach–Zehnder Interferometer. IEEE J. Select. Topics Quantum Electron. 2018. V. 24. № 1. P. 1–8.
  56. Stepanov I.V. et al. Design of a Photonic Integrated Device with an on-Chip k-Clock and Tunable Reference Arm for Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography. J-BPE. 2023. P. 030317.
  57. Burla M. et al. Integrated waveguide Bragg gratings for microwave photonics signal processing. Opt. Express. 2013. V. 21. № 21. P. 25120.
Date of receipt: 07.08.2024
Approved after review: 21.08.2024
Accepted for publication: 25.11.2024