350 rub
Journal Radioengineering №11 for 2021 г.
Article in number:
Error-rate performance for signals with controlled intersymbol interference when applying detection algorithms of symbol-by-symbol processing with decision feedback
Type of article: scientific article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18127/j00338486-202111-19
UDC: 621.396
Authors:

I.I. Lavrenyuk1, S.B. Makarov2, S.V. Zavjalov3

1−3 Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University (Saint-Petersburg, Russia)

Abstract:

One of the most promising methods for solving the problem of increasing the efficiency of using the frequency resource of modern wireless communication systems is the application of signals with controlled intersymbol interference. Such artificial interference can be introduced in both the time and frequency domains, thus providing tools for increasing the symbol rate of information transmission and/or for controlling the occupied bandwidth. Accordingly, for effective detection of signals with artificial interference on the receiver side, it is necessary to apply detection algorithms that compensate for the influence of intersymbol interference, otherwise it is logical to expect an increase in energy losses. From the point of view of the practical application of this approach, the main obstacle and limitation is the extremely high computational complexity of existing algorithms for detection such signals. As a result, it becomes necessary to develop and study algorithms that provide a compromise between the energy efficiency of such a system and the computational complexity of the implementation of a signal detection scheme with artificial interference. This paper discusses the application of a relatively simple (from the point of view of computational complexity) algorithm with decision feedback and optimization of the observation interval for single-frequency signals with time-controlled interference. The signals are built on the basis of the known forms of amplitude pulses of the form of a square root of the raised cosine, as well as on the basis of the forms of pulses obtained as a result of solving the optimization problem. Variants for coherent and incoherent detection algorithms with feedback are considered, a moderate increase in energy efficiency is demonstrated while maintaining the computational complexity at a low level for relatively moderate levels of intersymbol interference in the signal. The paper gives an estimate of the BER performance for FTN signaling when applying algorithms of coherent and noncoherent processing with decision feedback with the optimal values of the observation interval at increased message transmission rates R > 1/T. Shown that it possible to ensure stable detection of binary signals with artificial interference up to symbol rates exceeding the Nyquist limit by a factor of ~2.85.

The optimal values of the observation interval for a wide range of transmission rates depend on the duration of the shaping pulses, but little depend on the transmission rate, both in the case of using coherent and noncoherent reception algorithms.

The effect of grouping errors, leading to a sharp decrease in the BER performance, begins to affect at transmission rates higher than R = 1.42/T in the region of small values of the signal-to-noise ratio and is more pronounced when using coherent processing algorithms.

Pages: 146-162
For citation

Lavrenyuk I.I., Makarov S.B., Zavjalov S.V. Error-rate performance for signals with controlled intersymbol interference when applying  detection algorithms of symbol-by-symbol processing with decision feedback. Radiotekhnika. 2021. V. 85. № 11. P. 146−162.  DOI: https://doi.org/10.18127/j00338486-202111-19 (In Russian)

References
  1. Anderson J., Rusek F., Öwall V. Faster-Than-Nyquist Signaling. Proceedings of the IEEE. 2013. V. 101. № 8. Р. 1817−1830.
  2. Anderson J., Rusek F. Constrained Capacities for Faster-Than-Nyquist Signaling. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory. 2009.  V. 55. № 2. Р. 764−775.
  3. Proakis J.G. Digital Communications. 5th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill. 2007.
  4. Makarov S.B., Cikin I.A. Peredacha diskretnyh soobshhenij po radiokanalam s ogranichennoj polosoj propuskanija. M.: Radio i svjaz'. 1988. 304 s. (In Russian).
  5. Bedeer E., Ahmed M., Yanikomeroglu H. A Very Low Complexity Successive Symbolby-Symbol Sequence Estimator for Faster-ThanNyquist Signaling. IEEE Access. 2017. № 5. Р. 7414−7422.
  6. Ishihara T., Sugiura S., Hanzo L. The Evolution of Faster-Than-Nyquist Signaling. in IEEE Access. 2021. V. 9. Р. 86535−86564. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3088997.
  7. Bedeer E., Ahmed M.H., Yanikomeroglu H. Low-Complexity Detection of High-Order QAM Faster-Than-Nyquist Signaling. in IEEE Access. 2017. V. 5. Р. 14579−14588. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2719628.
  8. Makarov S.B., et al. Optimizing the Shape of Faster-Than-Nyquist (FTN) Signals with the Constraint on Energy Concentration in the Occupied Frequency Bandwidth. in IEEE Access. 2020. V. 8. Р. 130082−130093. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3009213.
  9. Makarov S.B., Ovsyannikova A.S., Lavrenyuk I.I., Zavjalov S.V., Volvenko S.V. Distributions of probability of power values for random sequences of optimal FTN signals. 2018 International Symposium on Consumer Technologies (ISCT). 2018. Р. 57−59. DOI: 10.1109/ISCE.2018.8408919.
  10. Lavrenjuk I.I. i dr. Statisticheskie harakteristiki sluchajnoj posledovatel'nosti optimal'nyh FTN signalov. Radiotehnika. 2018. № 12.  S. 78−84 (In Russian).
  11. Ovsyannikova A.S., Zavjalov S.V., Volvenko S.V. Influence of Correlation Coefficient on Spectral and Energy Efficiency of Optimal Signals // 2018 10th International Congress on Ultra Modern Telecommunications and Control Systems and Workshops (ICUMT). 2018. Р. 1−4. DOI: 10.1109/ICUMT.2018.8631218.
  12. Gelgor A., Gelgor T. New Pulse Shapes for Partial Response Signaling to Outperform Faster-than-Nyquist Signaling. 2019 IEEE International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Photonics (EExPolytech). 2019. Р. 144−148. DOI: 10.1109/EExPolytech.2019.8906884.
  13. Said A., Anderson J.B. Design of optimal signals for bandwidth-efficient linear coded modulation. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory. March 1998. V. 44. Р. 701−713.
  14. Gelgor A., Nguyen V. Outperforming Conventional OFDM and SEFDM Signals by Means of Using Optimal Spectral Pulses and the MBCJR Algorithm. In: 26th International Conference on Telecommunications. 2019. Р. 130−134 (IEEE. Vietnam. 2019). 
  15. Okunev Ju.B., Fink L.M. Pomehoustojchivost' dvoichnyh sistem s fazoraznostnoj moduljaciej vtorogo porjadka pri razlichnyh metodah priema. Radiotehnika. 1984. №8. S. 3−8 (In Russian).
  16. Okunev Ju.B. Cifrovaja peredacha informacii fazomodulirovannymi signalami. M: Radio i svjaz'. 1991. 296 s. (In Russian).
Date of receipt: 07.10.2021
Approved after review: 21.10.2021
Accepted for publication: 28.10.2021