E.V. Naidenov - Post-Graduate Student, Assistant, Department of Electronics and Microprocessor Technology, Smolensk Branch of the National Research University Moscow Power Engineering Institute. E-mail: nzettez@gmail.com L.L. Ljamets - Ph.D. (Eng.), Department of Electronics and Microprocessor Technology, Smolensk Branch of the National Research University Moscow Power Engineering Institute. E-mail: lll190965@yandex.ru

An approach to the definition of the process from the perspective of the transformation of matter, energy and information, prepared in accordance with lying at its core technological method. An analysis of a complex process, allows us to consider it as a composition of elementary processes taking place in series, parallel and series-parallel. Elementary processes are presented as a set of operations with material, energy and information substrates. The subject of this article are the features of the organization of the process, the parame-ters of its intrinsic properties, interaction with the environment, rather than how it formalized description, for example, using notations such as the UML, ARIS, BPMN, etc.

 

1. Blauberg I.V., Sadovskijj V.N., JUdin EH.G. Filosofskijj princip sistemnosti i sistemnyjj podkhod // Voprosy filosofii. 1978. № 8.
2. Ljamec L.L. Podkhod k predstavleniju obektov na osnove sistemy n-mestnykh otnoshenijj v zadachakh raspoznavanija slozhnojj realnosti // Nauchnoe obozrenie. 2015. № 2. S 105-108.
3. Sokolov A.V. Informaticheskie opusy. Opus 3. Ontologija informacii. Tipy realnostejj i tipy informacii // Nauchnye i tekhnicheskie biblioteki. 2010. № 11. S. 7-24.
4. Keil F.C. Folkscience: Coarse interpretations of a complex reality. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2003. V. 7. № 8. R. 368-373.
5. GOST 3.1109-82 Terminy i opredelenija osnovnykh ponjatijj. M.: Izd-vo standartov. 2003. 14 s.
6. GOST 3.1119-83 Edinaja sistema tekhnologicheskojj dokumentacii. Obshhie trebovanija k komplektnosti i oformleniju komplektov dokumentov na edinichnye tekhnologicheskie processy. M.: Izd-vo standartov. 2012. 12 s.
7. Sidorova A.I., Egorov A.N. Primenenija statisticheskikh metodov analiza i kontrolja kachestva pri upravlenii tekhnologicheskimi processami v proizvodstvennykh uslovijakh // Aktualnye napravlenija nauchnykh issledovanijj XXI veka: teorija i praktika. 2015. T. 3. № 7-2 (18-2). S. 461-464.
8. Vlasov A.I. Sistemnyjj analiz tekhnologicheskikh processov proizvodstva slozhnykh tekhnicheskikh sistem s ispolzovaniem vizualnykh modelejj // Mezhdunarodnyjj nauchno-issledovatelskijj zhurnal. 2013. № 10-2 (17). S. 17-26.
9. Kulakov JU.V., SHamkin V.N. Upravlenie slozhnym tekhnologicheskim processom kak zadacha o konechnom avtomate // Nauka i ustojjchivoe razvitie obshhestva. Nasledie V.I. Vernadskogo. 2009. № 9. S. 213-218.
10. Suppes P., Zines Dzh. Osnovy teorii izmerenijj // Psikhologicheskie izmerenija. M.: Mir. 1967. C. 9-11.
11. Pfancagl I. Teorija izmerenijj. M.: Mir. 1976. 248 c.
12. Kuznecov L.A., Domashnev P.A. Nejjrosetevye modeli dlja opisanija slozhnykh tekhnologicheskikh processov // Problemy upravlenija. 2004. Vyp. 1. S. 20-27.
13. Albers M.J., Mazur M.B. Content and complexity: information design in technical communication. Routledge. 2014. 380 p.
14. Najjdjonov E.V, ZHendarev M.V., JAkimenko I.V. Sposob upravlenija apparatnojj platformojj specializirovannojj tekhnicheskojj sistemy // Nelinejjnyjj mir. 2015. T. 13. № 6. S. 60-67.
15. Solovev V.V., Vaarman V.V. Celi upravlenija slozhnojj tekhnicheskojj sistemojj v uslovijakh neopredelennosti // Sovremennye nauchnye issledovanija i innovacii. 2013. № 12(32). S. 10.