350 rub
Journal Nonlinear World №2 for 2016 г.
Article in number:
The nature of the Barr effect and anomalous eccentricities of exoplanets
Authors:
S.A. Semikov - Master of Physics, Assistant, Engineer, Department of General Physics, Nizhny Novgorod State University named after N.I. Lobachevsky. E-mail: sergey-semikov@yandex.ru; semisea@mail
Abstract:
An anomaly of periastron longitude distribution of spectroscopic binary stars discovered more than a century ago has been studied according to which stars with the orbits extended in the direction of the Earth prevail, that is stars with periastron longitudes ω in the range 0° ≤ ω < 180° where concentration of periastrons is especially large with ω = 90°. This anomaly named after its discoverer the Barr effect (or B-effect) still does not have an unambiguous explanation. Hypotheses of Barr himself as well as Struve, Brazhnikova and others suggesting explanations of the Barr effect have been studied and their contradiction to observations has been shown. It has been demonstrated that among all the suggested hypotheses only Guthnik and Freundlich hypothesis based on ballistic theory explains all the peculiarities of the Bar effect. This hypothesis suggests that dependence of light velocity on the velocity of the emitting star results in distortion of visible stellar motions and of radial velocity curves. Distorted radial velocity curves comply with the orbits elongated in the direction of the Earth. Not only does Guthnik and Freundlich hypothesis qualitatively and quantitively explain all the peculiarities of the Barr effect, but it also complies with all the criteria for ascertainment of the nature of the effect suggested in this paper. Apart from that, an additional effect (Ritz effect) predicted by ballistic theory has been studied which results in frequency shift and brightness variations and which differs from Doppler effect. It has been shown that the shifts of spectrum lines caused by Ritz effect will be interpreted as Doppler shifts which results in construction of false radial velocity curves. Ritz effect allows to explain a number of anomalies of «radial velocity curves» and «light curves» of binary stars. Moreover, ballistic theory and Ritz effect following from it allows to explain a number of anomalies observed in exoplanet systems, in-cluding the Barr effect discovered for them, anomalously high eccentricities, retrograde motion of exoplanets, anomalously high and anomalously low orbital radiuses, a large number of planets in orbital resonance, anomalies of mass, density, etc. Thus, ballistic theory allows to easily and precisely explain the Barr effect and a number of other anomalies, statistical distributions and regularities, which have been discovered in recent years but have not been explained yet. A possible role of cosmic light dispersion in distortion of radial velocity curves has been studied which is essential for explanation of some additional anomalies of statistical distributions of exoplanets on periastron longitudes. Criteria suggested in this paper allow to verify if the abovementioned anomalies of exoplanets and binary stars are caused by the va-riability of light velocity and the effects of ballistic theory and to determine the proper characteristics of exoplanets and binary stars.
Pages: 3-37
References

 

  1. Barr J.M. The orbits and «velocity curves» of spectroscopic binaries // J. Roy. Astron. Soc. of Canada. 1908. V. 2. P. 70-75.
  2. Batten A.H. The Barr Effect // J. Roy. Astron. Soc. of Canada. 1983. V. 77. № 2. P. 95-97.
  3. Fox J.G. Evidence Against Emission Theories // Am. J. Phys. 1965. V. 33. P. 1-17.
  4. Behtten A.Dvojjnye i kratnye zvjozdy. M.: Mir. 1976. 323 s.
  5. Brazhnikova EH.F., Babinchuk S.V. Ob osobennosti raspolozhenija periastrov orbit spektralno-dvojjnykh zvjozd // Astronomicheskijj zhurnal. 1965. V. 42. S. 678-679.
  6. Brazhnikova EH.F.Zagadka spektralno-dvojjnykh zvjozd // Zemlja i Vselennaja. 1968. №5. S. 27-29.
  7. Brazhnikova EH.F.O selekcii pri otkrytii spektralno-dvojjnykh zvjozd i interpretacii B-ehffekta // Astronomicheskijj zhurnal. 1970. T. 47. vyp. 1. S. 149-161.
  8. Brazhnikova EH.F., Dagaev M.M., Radzievskijj V.V. O galakticheskojj orientacii orbit // Astronomicheskijj zhurnal. 1975.  T. 52. vyp. 3. S. 546-552.
  9. Semikov S.A.EHkzoplanetnaja ehkzotika: illjuzii i realnost // Tekhnika-molodjozhi.2013. № 1. S. 24-26.
  10. Struve O., Huang S.-S. Close Binary Stars. Occas. Notes // R. Astr. Soc. 1957. V. 3(19). P. 161-188.
  11. Guthnik P. Astronomische Kriterien für die Unabhängigkeit der Fortpflanzungsgeschwindigkeit des Lichtes von der Bewegung der Lichtquelle // Astr. Nachr. 1913. V. 195. S. 265-270.
  12. Freundlich E. Zur Frage der Konstanz der Lichtgeschwindigkeit // Phys. Z. 1913. V. 14. S. 835-838.
  13. Loeb A., Gaudi B.S.Periodic Flux Variability of Stars due to the Reflex Doppler Effect Induced by Planetary Companions // Astroph. J. Letters. 2003. V. 588. L117-L120.
  14. Bakanov V.A.Rasshirennyjj katalog orbit vizualno-dvojjnykh zvjozd s izvestnymi ehlementami i ehffekt Barra u ehtikh sistem // Uchjonye zapiski GPI. Ser. Fizicheskie nauki. 1972. Vyp. 124. C. 50-63.
  15. Tolstykh V.I.EHffekt Barra i antiapeksialnyjj ehffekt u zatmenno-dvojjnykh zvjozd // Uchjonye zapiski GPI. Ser. Fizicheskie nauki. 1972. Vyp. 124. S. 70-73.
  16. Belopolskijj A.A. Astronomicheskie trudy. M.: Gostekhizdat. 1954. 320 s.
  17. Ritz W. Recherches critiques sur l\'Electrodynamique Generale // Ann. Chim. Phys. 1908. V. 13. P. 145-275. URL: http://ritz-btr.narod.ru/contents.html (data obrashhenija 04.03.2013).
  18. Comstock D.F. A Neglected Type of Relativity // Phys. Rev. 1910. V. 30. P. 267.
  19. Zurhellen W. Zur Frage der Astronomischen Kriterien fur die Konstanz der Lichtgeschwindigkeit // Astr. Nachr. 1914. V. 198. P. 1-10.
  20. De Sitter W. Ein astronomischer Beweis für die Konstanz der Lichtgeschwindigkeit // Phys. Z. 1913. Bd. 14. S. 429, 1267.
  21. Sivukhin D.V.Optika. M.: Nauka. 1980. 752 s.
  22. Frankfurt U.I., Frenk A.M. Optika dvizhushhikhsja tel. M.: Nauka. 1972. 212 s.
  23. Rouzver N.T.Perigelijj Merkurija ot Levere do EHjjnshtejjna. M.: Mir. 1985. S. 161.
  24. Semikov S.A.Ob ehksperimentalnojj proverke ballisticheskojj teorii sveta // Vestnik NNGU. 2013. № 4(1). S. 56-63.
  25. Henke B.L., Gullikson E.M., Davis J.C.X-ray interactions: photoabsorption, scattering, transmission, and reflection at E = 50-30000 eV, Z = 1-92 // Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables. July 1993. V. 54. № 2. P. 181-342.
  26. Cottam J., Paerels F., Mendez M.Gravitationally redshifted absorption lines in the X-ray burst spectra of a neutron star // Nature. 2002. V. 420. P. 51-54.
  27. Fizika kosmosa. M.: Sovetskaja ehnciklopedija, 1986. 783 s.
  28. Habs D., Gunther M.M., Jentschel M., Urban W.D. The Refractive Index of Silicon at γ-Ray Energies. URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1111.3608v2 (data obrashhenija 29.03.2014).
  29. Brecher K. Is the Speed of Light Independent of the Velocity of the Source - // Phys. Rev. Lett. 1977. V. 39. P. 1051-1054.
  30. Sacunkevich I.S.EHksperimentalnye korni specialnojj teorii otnositelnosti. M.: URSS, 2003. 176 s.
  31. Brecher K. Precision Test of Special Relativity Using Gamma Ray Bursts // Bulletin of Physics News. 2000. № 484. May 11.
  32. Fox J.G. Constancy of the velocity of light // JOSA. 1967. V. 57. P. 967-968.
  33. Moon P., Spencer D. Binary Stars and the Velocity of Light // JOSA. 1953. V. 43. № 8. P. 635-641.
  34. Bonch-Bruevich A.M., Molchanov V.A. Novyjj opticheskijj reljativistskijj opyt // Optika i spektrosk. 1956. T. 1(2). S. 113-124.
  35. Semikov S.A. O vozmozhnykh istochnikakh vychislitelnykh oshibok kosmicheskojj navigacii, GPS i GLONASS, lazernojj lokacii i radiolokacii // Trudy 1-jj rossijjsko-belorusskojj nauch.-tekhnich. konf. «EHlementnaja baza otechestvennojj radioehlektroniki», posvjashhjonnojj 110-letiju so dnja rozhdenija O.V. Loseva / Pod red. A.EH. Rassadina. N. Novgorod.: Nizhegorodskaja radiolaboratorija. 2013. V 2-kh tomakh. T. 1. S. 236-240.
  36. Semikov S.A.Ob ehffekte transformacii dliny volny, dlitelnosti i moshhnosti lazernykh impulsov pri rassejanii na uskorenno letjashhikh chasticakh // Vestnik NNGU. 2014. № 1(2). S. 180-185.
  37. Djomin V.N., Seleznjov V.P. Mirozdanie postigaja - M.: Molodaja Gvardija. 1989. 267 s.
  38. Seleznjova N.V.Pokorenie kosmicheskogo prostranstva: ehpopei sovetskogo izobretatelja. M.: Librokom. 2013. 360 s.
  39. Seleznjov V.P.Navigacionnye ustrojjstva. M.: Oborongiz. 1961. 615 s.
  40. Wallace B.G. Radar Testing of the Relative Velocity of Light in Space // Spectroscopy Lett. 1969. V. 2(12). P. 361-367.
  41. Wallace B.G. Radar Evidence that the Velocity of Light in Space is Not c // Spectroscopy Lett. 1971. V. 4. P. 79-84.
  42. Anderson Dzh., Laing F., Lau EH., Neto M., Turishev S. Strannoe uskorenie «Pionerov» // Zemlja i Vselennaja. 2002. № 5. C. 78-81.
  43. Anderson J.D., Laing P.A., Lau E.L., et al.Indication, from Pioneer 10/11, Galileo, and Ulysses Data, of an Apparent Anomalous, Weak, Long-Range Acceleration // Phys. Rev. Lett. 1998. V. 81. P. 2858-2861.
  44. Gezari D.Y. Lunar Laser Ranging Test of the Invariance of c.URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/0912.3934(dataobrashhenija 04.03.2013).
  45. Semikov S.A.Ballisticheskaja teorija Ritca i kartina mirozdanija. N. Novgorod: Stimul-ST. 2010. 612 s.
  46. Rabinovich M.I., Trubeckov D.I. Vvedenie v teoriju kolebanijj i voln. M.: Nauka. 1984. 432 s.
  47. Braginskijj V.B., Polnarjov A.G. Udivitelnaja gravitacija. M.: Nauka. 1985. 160 s.
  48. SHapiro I.Radiolokacionnye nabljudenija planet // UFN. 1969. T. 99. S. 319-336.
  49. Semikov S.A.Variacii skorosti sveta kak vozmozhnyjj istochnik oshibok kosmicheskojj navigacii, radiolokacii i lazernojj lokacii // ZHurnal radioehlektroniki. 2013. №12. S. 1-32. URL: http://jre.cplire.ru/jre/dec13/17/text.html (data obrashhenija 29.06.2014).
  50. Semikov S.A.Kosmos russkogo Aristarkha // Istorija nauki i tekhniki. 2007. №1. S. 60-64.
  51. Ciolkovskijj K.EH.Ocherki o Vselennojj. Kaluga: Zolotaja alleja. 2001. 384 s.
  52. Vavilov S.I.Sobranie sochinenijj. T. 2. M.: AN SSSR, 1952. S. 131.
  53. Semikov S.A.EHffekt transformacii chastoty sveta pri uskorenii istochnika i kriterii ego ehksperimentalnojj proverki // Nelinejjnyjj mir. 2014. №6. S. 3-15.
  54. Murad P.A. Replicating Pulsar Behaviour to Create a Future Space Propulsor // International Journal of Astronomy. 2012. № 1(5). P. 81-86.
  55. GongBi-Ping, YanZ.Q.Evidence of Residual Doppler Shift on Three Pulsars, PSR B1259-63, 4U1627-67 and PSR J2051-0827. URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1401.6530v1(data obrashhenija 20.08.2014).
  56. Ragos O., Haranas I., Gkigkitzis I. Effects in the Anomalistic Period of Celestial Bodies due to a Logarithmic Correction to the Newtonian Gravitational Potential // Astrophysics and Space Science. V. 345. Is. 1. P. 67-72.
  57. La Rosa M. Addiert sich die Geschwindigkeit des Lichtes zu derjenigen der Lichtquelle - Dafür sprechende Beweise aus den Phänomenen der «veränderlichen Sterne» // Phys. Z. 1924. V. 21. P. 333-347.
  58. La Rosa M. Neur Beitrag zur ballistischen Theorie der «veränderlichen Sterne» // Astr. Nachr. 1929. V. 234. P. 235-243.
  59. Sekerin V.I.Teorija otnositelnosti - mistifikacija veka. Novosibirsk. 1991. 56 s.
  60. Kolesnikov A.I., Ljutyjj V.M., Talyzin I.V. Nabljudatelnye fakty i ikh interpretacija v astrofizike // Vestnik TvGU. Ser. Fizika. 2005. Vyp. 2. № 9(15). C. 124-131.
  61. Pietrzynski G., Thompson I.B., Gieren, W., et al.RR-Lyrae-type pulsations from a 0.26-solar-mass star in a binary system // Nature. 2012. V. 484. P. 75-77.
  62. URL: http://www.astronomy.ru/forum/index.php/topic,91249.0.html (data obrashhenija 14.07.2014).
  63. Comstock D.F. A Simple Criterion for the Detection of Anomalies in the Orbits of Spectroscopic Binaries // Astroph. Journal. 1910. V. 31. P. 364.
  64. CHikin P.S.Problema statistiki zvjozd i skorost sveta // Aktualnye problemy sovremennojj nauki. 2005. № 2. S. 88-101.
  65. Semikov S.A.Kljuch k zagadkam kosmosa // Inzhener. 2006. № 3. S. 8-11.
  66. Struve O. The Spectrum of RX Cassiopeiae // Astrophys. J. 1944. V. 99. P. 295-312.
  67. Pribulla T., Rucinski S.M., Lu W., et al.Radial Velocity Studies of Close Binary Stars. XI // Astron. Journal. 2006. V. 132. № 2.  R. 769-780.
  68. Aleksandrov E.B.Ob odnom astrofizicheskom dokazatelstve vtorogo postulata specialnojj teorii otnositelnosti // Astron. zhurnal. 1965. T. 42. Vyp. 3. C. 676-678.
  69. Savedoff M.P. On (e cosω) for Eclipsing Binaries // Astron. J. 1951. V. 56.P. 1-9.
  70. Struve O. Spectroscopic Binaries // Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 1949. V. 109. P. 487-506.
  71. McNamara D.H. The Eclipsing Binary U Sagittae // Astrophys. J. 1951. V. 114. P. 513-521.
  72. Abhyankar K.D. A Study of Some Early Type Close Binary Stars // Astrophys. J. Suppl., Ser. 4.1959. P. 157-198.
  73. Linder N., Rauw G., Sana H., et al. The Struve-Sahade Effect in the Optical Spectra of O-Type Binaries. I. Main-Sequence Systems // Astronomy & Astrophysics. 2007. V. 474. P. 193-204.
  74. Alduseva V.JA.Spektroskopicheskie issledovanija RX Cas // Astronomicheskijj zhurnal. 1987. T. 64. S. 591-600.
  75. Arras P., Burkart J., Quataert E., Weinberg N. The Radial Velocity Signature of Tides Raised in Stars Hosting Exoplanets // MNRAS. 2012. V. 422. P. 1761-1766.
  76. Hebrard G., Almenara J.-M., Santerne A., et al.KOI-200b and KOI-889b: Two Transiting Exoplanets Detected and Characterized with Kepler, SOPHIE and HARPS-N // Astronomy & Astrophysics. 2013. № 554. A114. April 23. S. 1-10.
  77. URL: http://exoplanets.org (data obrashhenija 04.03.2013).
  78. Barbieri M., Alonso R., Desidera S., et al.Characterization of the HD 17156 Planetary System // Astronomy & Astrophysics. 2009. V. 503. P. 601-612.
  79. Kürster M. Hot Jupiters and Hot Spots: The Short- and Long-Term Chromospheric Activity on Stars with Giant Planets // Astroph. Journal. 2005. V. 622(2). P. 1075-1090.
  80. Semikov S.A.CHerez polja k ehkzoplanetam // Tekhnika-molodjozhi. 2014. № 6. S. 28-31.
  81. Mushailov B.R., Teplickaja V.S. O nadjozhnosti opredelenija orbitalnykh parametrov ehkzoplanet doplerovskim metodom // Kosmicheskie issledovanija. 2012. T. 50. №6. S. 452-461.
  82. Mushailov B.R., Teplickaja V.S. Spektrometricheskijj metod obnaruzhenija ehkzoplanet kak eshhjo odin test dlja proverki invariantnosti skorosti sveta // Vestnik MGU. Ser. 3. 2011. № 6. S. 98-103.
  83. Grossman L. Exoplanet Pairs May Be Masquerading as Singles // New Scientist. 7 July 2009. URL: http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn17425-exoplanet-pairs-may-be-masquerading-as-singles.html (data obrashhenija 04.03.2013).
  84. Rodigas T.J., Hinz P.M. Which Radial Velocity Exoplanets Have Undetected Outer Companions - // Astroph. Journal. 2009. V. 702. P. 716-723.
  85. Chan T., Ingemyr M., Winn J.N., et al. The Transit Light-Curve Project. XIV. Confirmation of Anomalous Radii for the Exoplanets Tres-4b, Hat-P-3b, and Wasp-12b // Astron. Journal.2011. V. 141. №6. 179. URL: http://iopscience.iop.org/1538-3881/141/6/179/pdf/1538-3881_141_6_179.pdf (data obrashhenija 20.07.2014).
  86. Laughlin G., Crismani M., Adams F.C.On the Anomalous Radii of the Transiting Extrasolar Planets // Astroph. J. Letters. 2011. V. 729. №1. L7. URL: http://iopscience.iop.org/2041-8205/729/1/L7/pdf/2041-8205_729_1_L7.pdf (data obrashhenija 20.07.2014).
  87. Queloz D., Anderson D., Cameron A.C., et al.WASP-8b, a Retrograde Transiting Planet in a Multiple System // Astronomy & Astrophysics. 2010. April 12. P. 1-4.
  88. Lendl M., Triaud A.H.M.J., Anderson D.R., et al.WASP-117b: a 10-Day-Period Saturn in an Eccentric and Misaligned Orbit. URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.6942v1 (data obrashhenija 29.06.2014).
  89. Howard A.W., Sanchis-Ojeda R., Marcy G.W., et al. A Rocky Composition for an Earth-Sized Exoplanet // Nature. 2013. 503(7476). P. 381-384.
  90. Tikhov G.A.Dispersija v kosmicheskom prostranstve // ZHRFKHO. 1909. Vyp. 5. C. 176.
  91. Tikhov G.A.SHestdesjat let u teleskopa. M.: Detskaja literatura. 1959. S. 57.
  92. Tikhov G.A. Osnovnye trudy. T. 1. Alma-Ata: Izd-vo AN Kazakhskojj SSR. 1954. 336 s.
  93. Bunin V.A.Zatmennye dvojjnye zvjozdy i vopros o dispersii skorosti sveta v vakuume // Astronomicheskijj zhurnal. 1962.  T. 29. Vyp. 4. C. 768-769.
  94. Maslikov S.P. Novyjj variant «ballisticheskojj teorii» Valtera Ritca // Fizicheskaja mysl Rossii. 1998. № 1. S. 48-57.
  95. Semikov S.A.Sto let STO. Est li alternativa - // Inzhener. 2005. № 11. C. 21-24.
  96. Lajjsl Dzh.EHkzoplanety: neozhidannye otkrytija // Razumnyjj zamysel. Ijul 2011. № 4-6 (21). C. 3.