I. I. Greshnikov – Head of section, FGUP «GOSNIIAS» (Moscow)

E-mail: iigreshnikov@2100.gosniias.ru

G. A. Lavrova – PhD (Eng.), Engineer of the 1st cat., FGUP «GOSNIIAS» (Moscow)

E-mail: gasidorina@2100.gosniias.ru

T. D. Salnikov – Engineer, FGUP «GOSNIIAS» (Moscow)

E-mail: salnikovtimofeyof@gmail.com

V. I. Zlatomregev – Head of laboratory, FGUP «GOSNIIAS» (Moscow)

E-mail: vizlatomr@2100.gosniias.ru

G. V. Sergeeva – Engineer of the 1st cat., FGUP «GOSNIIAS» (Moscow)

E-mail: galina_sergeeva@bk.ru

One of the ways to optimize the process of improving the display system of modern aircraft is considered: the formalization and automation of the subjective assessment’s methodology concerning head-up display (HUD) options. Methods of the theory of non-numerical comparisons (in particular, the probabilistic approach of the pairwise comparisons method) are used to create it.

This methodology was tested on the basis of a universal prototyping bench and was highly appreciated by flight experts and ergonomic evaluation specialists. The use of this system will allow for an effective ergonomic assessment of the cockpit information control field, obtaining results of high reliability.

Greshnikov I.I., Lavrova G.A., Salnikov T.D., Zlatomregev V.I., Sergeeva G.V. Subjective methodology of the aircraft control and navigation equipment’s evaluation. Neurocomputers. 2020. V. 22. № 3. P. 18–25. DOI: 10.18127/j19998554-202003-02 

1. Greshnikov I.I., Zlatomrezhev V.I. Perspektivnoye informatsionno-upravlyayushcheye pole kabiny. realizuyushcheye novyye sposoby informatsionnogo obespecheniya ekipazha i upravleniya informatsionnym polem. Trudy 5-y Mezhdunar. konf. «Perspektivnyye napravleniya razvitiya bortovogo oborudovaniya grazhdanskikh vozdushnykh sudov». 2019. (in Russian).
2. Greshnikov I.I., Zlatomrezhev V.I. Ispolzovaniye peredovykh tekhnologiy dlya optimizatsii informatsionno-upravlyayushchego polya kabiny perspektivnogo samoleta. Trudy XVIII Vseros. nauchnoy konf. «Neyrokompyutery i ikh primeneniye». 2020. (in Russian).
3. Poisson R. J. Spatial Disorientation: Past. Present and Future. Ohio. USA: Air Force Institute of Technology. 2014. 72 p.
4. Lee B.G., Myung R. Attitude Indicator Design and Reference Frame Effects on Unusual Attitude Recoveries. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology. 2013. V. 23. № 1. P. 63-90.
5. Civil Aviation Administration of China. Dorozhnaya karta razvitiya primeneniya indikatorov na lobovom stekle (head-up display. HUD). 2012. 17 s.
6. Gorskiy P. Vvedeniye v distsiplinu «Podderzhka prinyatiya resheniy». 2009. [Elektronnyy resurs]. — URL: http://pavel.gorskiy.ru (data obrashcheniya: 30.06.2011). (in Russian).
7. Perminov G.I. Metod vydeleniya obshchnosti v alternativakh i kriteriyakh v zadachakh prinyatiya resheniy. Sotsiologiya nauki i tekhnologiy. 2011. T. 2. № 2. S. 90-104. (in Russian).
8. Podinovskiy V.V. Vvedeniye v teoriyu vazhnosti kriteriyev v mnogokriterialnykh zadachakh prinyatiya resheniy. M.: Fizmatlit. 2007. 64 s. (in Russian).
9. Borisov A.N., Krumberg O.A., Fedorov I.P. Prinyatiye resheniy na osnove nechetkikh modeley. Riga: «ZINATNE». 1990. 184 s. (in Russian).
10. Gusev A.N., Izmaylov Ch.A., Mikhalevskaya M.B. Izmereniye v psikhologii: obshchiy psikhologicheskiy praktikum. Izd. 2-e. M.: Smysl. 1987. C. 111. (in Russian).
11. Pat. RF № 101331 na izobreteniye ot 15.12.2016. Kompleks oborudovaniya (stend) prototipirovaniya interfeysa kabiny vozdushnogo sudna / Zheltov S.Yu., Fedosov E.A., Chuyanov G.A., Koverinskiy I.V., Zlatomrezhev V.I., Sladkov A.V., Zlatomrezhev I.V. (in Russian).