M.A. Posokhova - Post-graduate Student, Department of «Defectology and Age Physiology» of Tyumen State University. E-mail: fateevanm@yandex.ru N.M. Fateeva - Dr.Sc. (Biol.), Professor, Department of «Defectology and Age Physiology» of Tyumen State University. E-mail: fateevanm@yandex.ru

The success of student-s adaptation Main features of dysarthria are speech sound and voice disorders which are associated mainly to articulating and speech breathing disorders. The research showed that the condition of external and speech breathing of children age 5-6 years with a pseudobulbar dysarthria is lower, than of children with the speech development meeting the age standards. The comparative analysis of the results showed that in the first experimental group after performed work related to speech breathing formation the indicators value of external breathing and speech considerably increased. Thus, the vital capacity of lungs (VCL) in children of the 1st experimental group increased by 12% (at the beginning of the year it was 80% in com-parison with VCL at the year-end - 92%) whereas in children of the 2nd experimental group the indicators value of VCL in-creased only by 2%. The increase of indicator values of external breathing in the 1st experimental group considerably influenced the speech breathing. The indicator of speech breathing in children of the 1st experimental group increased by 44% (40% at the beginning of a year and 84% at the end of the year), in the second group this indicator increased only by 9% (from 43 to 52%). One of the most important task in speech breathing formation is the development of diaphragmal breathing pattern. The study showed that before correction work children with pseudobulbar dysarthria had clavicular type of breathing and after ad-ditional remedial work 70% of children of the 1st experimental group had diaphragmatic type of breathing as the most physiology and optimal for normal phonation. While inspecting the condition of speech function at the beginning of the year it was established that the weakest side in children with pseudobulbar dysarthria was sensomotor: the phonemic perception, articulation, sounds pronunciation of the words. The study confirms that children with pseudobulbar dysarthria have phonetic and phonemic violations of the speech. The analysis of results showed that in children of the first experimental group the indicator of the sound pronunciation increased by 21%. In the beginning of the year it was 50%, in the end of the year it increased up to 71%. Conclusion. The comparative analysis showed that speech approbation in the first experimental group where logopedic therapy was followed by additional formation of speech breathing was more successful than the second experimental group where additional work on formation of speech breathing wasn\'t carried out.

 

1. Arkhipova E.F. Korrekcionno-logopedicheskaja rabota po preodoleniju stertojj dizartrii u detejj. M.: AST. 2010. 254 s.
2. Beljakova L.I. Razvitie rechevogo dykhanija u doshkolnikov s narusheniem rechi: metod. posobie. M.: Knigoljub. 2005. 55 s.