350 rub
Journal Neurocomputers №6 for 2016 г.
Article in number:
Neuro-public administration
Authors:
Yu.Yu. Petrunin - Ph.D. (Philos.), Professor, Strategic Communications Department, School of Public Administration, Lomonosov Moscow State University. E-mail: petrunin@spa.msu.ru
Abstract:
The rapid development of neuroscience has led to the emergence of some new scientific disciplines. In particular is widely known in theoretical, and in practice such social Sciences as neuroeconomics, neuromarketing, neuromanagement. Today is not less important management science - Neuro-Public Administration. Ideology, aggression, creativity, morality, individual differences and sense of identity are among topics of relevance to PA and neuroscience. Scientists describes how neuroscience promised to act as a catalyst, in the longer run, in seeking re-unification of the fragmented social sciences (e.g., political science and economics) and social action subjects (e.g., public administration and business administration) that concern governance. Equally important for public administration may have the use of neurocomputing to the analysis and forecasting of com-plex economic, political and social processes in society, in the state and at the interstate level. Neurocomputing models can also be useful for solving such complex non-linear tasks, as assessing the effectiveness of state programs, identifying fraud and mi-suse of budget funds, public opinion research and increase public satisfaction with the activities of state authorities. This work was financially supported by RFN in grant № 15-03-00519a - Post-non-classic paradigm of artificial intellect?.
Pages: 10-11
References

 

  1. Petrunin JU.JU. Nejjrofilosofija v sisteme nejjronauk // Nejjrokompjutery: razrabotka, primenenie. 2015. № 4. S. 63-64.
  2. Bernheim B.D., Rangel A. From neuroscience to public policy: A new economic view of addiction // Swedish economic policy review. 2005. № 12. P. 99.
  3. Farmer D.J. Neuro-Gov: Neuroscience and governance // Administrative Theory and Praxis. 2006. V. 28. № 4. P. 653-662.
  4. Farmer D.J. Change the course, neurons // Administrative Theory and Praxis. 2007. V. 29. № 1. P. 182-192.
  5. Farmer D.J. Neuro-Gov: Neuroscience as catalyst / In: C. Senior, M. Butler (Eds.) The social cognitive neuroscience of organizations. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2007. V. 1118. P. 74-89.
  6. Farmer R.L. Neuroscience and social work practice: The missing link. Sage, 2009.
  7. Farmer D.J., Farmer R.L. Toward Epistemic Pluralism and Neuroscience // Public Administration in the XXI Century: Traditions and Innovations. Lomonosov Moscow State University: Moscow, Russia. 2011. P. 87-91.
  8. Petrunin JU.JU. Nasledie I.M. Sechenova i sovremennyjj prikladnojj nejjrokompjuting // Biomedicinskaja radioehlektronika. 2015. № 4. S. 56-57.
  9. Petrunin JU.JU. (otv. red.). Nejjrokompjuternaja paradigma i obshhestvo. M. 2012.