V.G. Kuznetcov - Dr.Sc. (Philos.), Professor, Head of Chair of Philosophy and Methodology, Science of the Faculty, Lomonosov Moscow State University. E-mail: Walery-Kus@yandex.ru

Neurophilosophy began as a research applying project of the neuroscience concepts to traditional philosophical and psychological issues. From the outset neurophilosophy separated themselves from philosophy of neuroscience. The philosophy of science and neuroscience were been the neurophilosophy sources. We shall consider the role of the philosophy of science in the justification neurophilosophy. Modern philosophy of science is differs significantly from earlier methodological concepts which investigates scientific theories and methodological apparatus of scientific knowledge. Since there is no question of science development, appeal to the history of science it was illustrative at best. Modern philosophy of science is linked with the history of science inextricably. Why - Modern philosophy of science is a collection (set) methodological concepts that explain the nature and development of scientific knowledge. With this understanding of the philosophy of science, history of science is an empirical base for testing the methodological concepts. The philosophical concept was being checked, and the history of science has become a subject of study philosophers. The rational reconstructions of the history of science were appeared. Questions of continuity and novelty of scientific knowledge about the historical development of science, the role of tradition, prejudice, the ratio of \"old\" and \"new\" knowledge were gained new formulation in the new historical-scientific philosophical context. It is these new conditions have contributed to clarify the role of the geocentric concept in astronomy, phlogiston and caloric in chemistry, physics etс. Overcoming these concepts during the development of science was associated with an objective of positive and negative evaluation of their role in the history of science. This idea was taken up by becoming neurophilosophy, which used the analogy of the philosophy of science to prove the falsity of folk psychology, elimination based on common sense psychological concepts. Often phlogiston theory and criticism vitalism in biology were used. Installation: «People\'s psychology can not be a scientific basis of the psyche.» That neuroscience data may be the basis. Modern cognitive and computational neuroscience makes it possible to carry out the demarcation line between cognitive neuroscience and representations based on common sense position of folk psychology.

 

1. KuznecovV.G.Russian phenomenology, or the interrupted flight //Metaphilosophy.2013. V. 44. №. 1-2. P. 32-36.
2. Kuznecov, V.G. Logika i logicheskijj analiz tekstov. M.: Izdatelskijj dom ATISO. 2010. 245 s.
3. Kuznecov V.G.Germenevtika i gumanitarnoe poznanie. M.: Izd-vo Moskovskogo universiteta 1991. S. 192.
4. Kuznecov V.G. Slovar filosofskikh terminov. M.:INFRA-M. 2013. 730 s.