350 rub
Journal Neurocomputers №12 for 2013 г.
Article in number:
Displaying the subjective differences of names of emotions and the differences in their expressive facial profiles in circular structures of 6-dimensional semantic space
Authors:
S. G. Korshunova  Senior Research Scientist, Department of Psychology, Lomonosov Moscow State University. E-mail: ksg50@yandex.ru
O. B. Stepanova  Associate Professor, Department of Psychology, Lomonosov Moscow State University. E-mail: psy_stob@mail.ru
Abstract:
Multidimensional scaling by using the procedure of individual differences INDSCAL finds that in the studied group of names of basic emotions and their synonymous terms perceived differences of names and differences expressive facial profiles of these names contain a well-adjusted information on the total group 6-dimensional semantic space. The variability of individual semantic structures in the studied sample of respondents is explained by varying weights coordinate values common semantic space. The general semantic space of names as a whole is identical repeats perceptual space of emotional facial expressions obtained earlier identical socio-demographic characteristics sample. Semantic emotional space, similar to the emotional perceptual space is a 6-dimensional structure of values, where the linear Cartesian coordinates are basic neurons encoding emotion vector excitation patterns and angular coordinates form a circular psychological dimensions of quality, and energy aspects of emotional content - the tone of emotion, intensity, strength. The circular ordering of names in tone (emotional semantic circle) shows two-dimensional subspace - the system block formed by the axes of joy/sorrow, fear/anger. The circular order of names on the energy performance of intensity is represented by 2-dimensional block with the axes of activation/neutrality. And finally, dial the energy component of the strength also provided a third system block of the semantic space of the axes surprise/fear, disgust/anger.
Pages: 41-49
References

  1. Korshunova S.G., Stepanova O.B., Tetik L.I. Sfericheskaya model' prostranstva e'moczional'ny'x vy'razhenij licza, osnovannaya na vosprinimaemy'x razlichiyax // Nejrokomp'yutery': razrabotka, primenenie. 2012. № 2. S. 42-53.
  2. Tolkovy'j slovar' russkogo yazy'ka D.N. Ushakova. M.: Astrel', AST. 2000.
  3. Izmailov Ch.A., Sokolov E.N., Korshunova S.G. Multidimensional scaling of schematically represented faces based on dissimilarity estimates and evoked potentials of differences amplitudes // The Spanish Journal of Psychology. 2005. V. 8. № 2. P. 119-133.
  4. Izmailov Ch.A., Sokolov E.N., Korshunova S.G. The semantic Component of the Evoked Potential of Differentiation // The Spanish Journal of Psychology. 2008. V. 11. № 1. P. 323-342.
  5. Mosely R., Carota Fr., Hauk O., Mohr B., Pulvermuller Fr. A role for motor system in binding abstract emotional meaning. Cerebral Cortex. 2011.
  6. Osgood C.E. Dimensionality of the semantic space for communication via facial expressions // Scand. J. Psychol. 1966. V. 7. P. 1-30.
  7. Romney F.K., Moore C.C., Rusch C. Cultural universals: Measuring the semantic structure of emotion terms in English and Japanese // Proc. Natl. Sci. 1997. V. 94. P. 5489-5494.
  8. Posner J., Russell J.A., Gerber A., Gorman D., Colibazzi T., Shan Yu, Zh. Wang, Kangarlu A., Zhu H., Peterson B.S. The Neurophysiological Bases of Emotion: An fMRI Study of the Affective Circumplex Using Emotion-Denoting Words // Hum Brain Mapp. 2009. V. 30. № 3. P. 883-895.
  9. Sokolov E.N., Boucsein W. A psychophysiological model of emotion space // Integrative Physiological and Behavioral Sciences. 2000. V. 35. № 2. P. 81-119.
  10. Sprengelmeyer R., Young A.W., Calder A.J., Karnat A., Lange H., Hömberg V., Perrett D.I., Rowland D. Loss of disgust. Perception of faces and emotions in Huntington-s disease // Brain. 1996. V. 119. Pt. 5. P. 1647-1665.
  11. Young A.W., Rowland D, Calder A.J., Etcoff N.L., Seth A., Perrett D.I. Facial expression megamix: tests of dimensional and category accounts of emotion recognition // Cognition. 1997. V. 63. № 3. P. 271-313.