350 rub
Journal Information-measuring and Control Systems №1 for 2021 г.
Article in number:
Methodology for estimating the efficiency of optical-electronic systems using an analytical model. Functions of threshold contrast and modulation transfer
DOI: 10.18127/j20700814-202101-04
UDC: 62-50
Authors:

A.M. Krasnov¹, S.Yu. Tregubenkov², A.V. Rumyantsev³,  R.F. Khismatov4, S.N. Shashkov5

1 CJSC Process Cosmonautics Park LINKOS (Moscow, Russia)

2,3 308 Military Representative Office of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation(Moscow, Russia)

4,5 Special Design Bureau of JSC "Ramensky Instrument-Making Plant"(Ramenskoe, Russia)

Abstract:

Efficiency assessment is an integral part of the stages of development, testing and operation of optoelectronic systems. The lack of a unified methodology for assessing the effectiveness of optoelectronic systems leads to the fact that different assessment methods are used to compare different systems, as a result of which the results obtained are contradictory and do not provide objective data for making appropriate decisions at various stages of the life cycle of optoelectronic systems. One of the ways to solve this problem is the development of an analytical model, which can be the basis for the construction of a unified set of intellectual support for the design and maintenance of optical-electronic systems at all stages of the life cycle.

The aim of the study is to form an analytical model for evaluating the effectiveness of optoelectronic systems, in terms of the functions of threshold contrast and modulation transfer.

As a result, the analysis of models for evaluating the efficiency of the optoelectronic systems NVL 1975, FLIR92, NVTerm, NVTermIP and NV-IPM was carried out, and the main differences between these models were considered. The functions of the threshold system contrast and the threshold contrast of the human visual system are considered. The effect on the form of the threshold contrast function of the modulation transfer function (frequency-contrast characteristic) of the system and the external environment, as well as space-time noise, is shown. Then, a description is given of the components of the modulation transfer function of the system and the environment: the modulation transfer function of the turbulence of the atmosphere, the transfer function of the motion modulation of the optoelectronic system, the modulation transfer function of the optical system, the detector modulation transfer function; image processing modulation transmission functions. Monitor modulation transfer functions. The main parameters of the modulation transfer function, which are used to estimate the resolution of the optoelectronic system, are considered. Examples of evaluating the resolving power of various optoelectronic systems are given and the effect of smearing caused by the movement of the carrier of the optoelectronic system on the image quality for different values of exposure time is shown.

The practical significance lies in the fact that the research results were applied in the development of tactical and technical requirements for optoelectronic systems, in the development of optoelectronic systems at the stages of preliminary and technical design, showed the consistency of the calculation results with the results of using existing systems.

Pages: 45-64
For citation

Krasnov A.M., Tregubenkov S.Yu., Rumyantsev A.V., Khismatov R.F., Shashkov S.N. Methodology for estimating the efficiency of optical-electronic systems using an analytical model. Functions of threshold contrast and modulation transfer. Information-measuring and Control Systems. 2021. V. 19. № 1. P. 45−64. DOI: 10.18127/j20700814-202101-04  (I

References
  1. Driggers Ronald G., Friedman Melvin H., Nichols Jonathan. Introduction to Infrared and Electro-Optical Systems. Second Edition. Artech House, Boston, London. 2012.
  2. Holst Gerald C. Electro-Optical Imaging System Performance, sixth edition. JCD Publishing and SPIE Press. 2017.
  3. Holst Gerald C. Electro-Optical Imaging System Performance, second edition. JCD Publishing and SPIE Press. 2000. 
  4. Hughes Rachel. Sensor model requirements for taws/irtss operation. Naval Postgraduate School. Monterey, California. 2007. 
  5. Night Vision Thermal Imaging Systems Performance Model. User’s Manual & Reference Guide. U.S. Army Night Vision and Electronic Sensors Directorate. 2001.
  6. Vollmerhausen Richard H., Jacobs Eddie. The Targeting Task Performance (TTP) Metric A New Model for Predicting Target Acquisition Performance. Modeling and Simulation Division Night Vision and Electronic Sensors Directorate. U.S. Army CERDEC, Fort Belvoir, VA 22060. Technical Report AMSEL-NV-TR-230.
  7. Vollmerhausen Richard. Night vision integrated performance model: impact of a recent change on the model’s predictive accuracy // OPTICS EXPRESS. 2016. V. 24. № 21.
  8. Vollmerhausen R.H., Jacobs E., Driggers R.G. New metric for predicting target acquisition performance // Opt. Eng. 2004. V. 43. № 11. Р. 2806–2818.
  9. Preece B., Olson J., Reynolds J., Fanning J., Haefner D. Human vision noise model validation for the U.S. Army sensor performance metric // Optical Engineering. 2014. V. 53. № 6. Рaper 061712.
  10. Barten Peter G.J. Evaluation of subjective image quality with the square-root integral method // Optical Society of America. 1990. V. 7. № 10/October. 
  11. Lei F., Tiziani H. Modulation Transfer Function Obtained from Image Structures. In: Linkwitz K., Hangleiter U. (eds). High Precision Navigation. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. 1989.
  12. Chrzanowski Krzysztof. Testing thermal imagers. Practical guidebook. Military University of Technology. Warsaw, Poland. 2010.
Date of receipt: 08.11.2020
Approved after review: 04.12.2020
Accepted for publication: 13.01.2021