N.A. Skvortsov1

1 Federal Research Center «Computer Science and Control» of the RAS (Moscow, Russia)

The requirements for semantic publishing data in the domain in the frame of data management plans at all stages of solving research problems (not at the end of projects) are intended to replace efforts of heterogeneous data integration. A responsible approach to publishing data, knowledge, data models, schemas, resources, semantic correspondences of schema elements, data transformation rules, and methods allows this process to be performed once (not every time the data is reused) by data authors who are competent in their problem and the domain (not by users of data who are forced to understand the semantics by documentation). The published data selected in accordance with the specifications of the problem requirements should be comprehensively ready for reuse.

Skvortsov N.A. Publishing data and related resources in domain communities. Highly Available Systems. 2022. V. 18. № 4. P. 56−67. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.18127/j20729472-202204-05 (in Russian)

1. Skvortsov N.A., Stupnikov S.A. Managing Data-Intensive Research Problem-Solving Lifecycle. Data Analytics and Management in Data Intensive Domains (DAMDID 2020). CCIS. V. 1427. Springer. 2021.
2. Bourne Ph.E. et al. Improving the Future of Research Communications and e-Scholarship. Dagstuhl Perspectives Workshop 11331. 2012. https://doi.org/10.4230/DagMan.1.1.41
3. Martone M. (Ed.), Data Citation Synthesis Group: Joint Declaration of Data Citation Principles. FORCE11; 2014 https://doi.org/10.25490/a97f-egyk
4. Wilkinson M. et al. The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. In: Scientific data, Vol. 3 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18
5. GO FAIR Initiative. https://www.go-fair.org/go-fair-initiative/
6. EOSC Declaration. Brussels, 2017. https://eosc-portal.eu/sites/default/files/eosc_declaration.pdf
7. Strasbourg astronomical Data Center. https://cds.u-strasbg.fr/
8. Registry of research data repositories. https://www.re3data.org/
9. Michener W.K. Ten Simple Rules for Creating a Good Data Management Plan. PLoS computational biology, 11(10): e1004525. (2015) DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004525
10. DMPOnline. Plan to make data work for you. https://dmponline.dcc.ac.uk/
11. Miksa T., Simms S., Mietchen D., Jones S. Ten principles for machine-actionable data management plans. PLoS computational biology. 2019. V. 15 № 3. P. e1006750, . DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006750
12. Albertoni R. et al. Data Catalog Vocabulary (DCAT). Version 2. W3C Recommendation, 2020. https://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-dcat-2/
13. Open Digital Rights Language (ODRL). https://www.w3.org/ns/odrl/2/
14. Lebo T., Sahoo S., McGuinness D. PROV-O: The PROV Ontology. W3C Recommendation, 2013. https://www.w3.org/TR/prov-o/
15. Albertoni R., Isaac A. Data on the Web Best Practices: Data Quality Vocabulary. W3C Working Group Note, 2016. https://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-dqv/
16. Myshenkov K.S., Simonov M.F., Korostelev V.M. Selection rationale of the database modeling software. Dynamics of complex systems. 2020. V. 14. № 2. Р. 77-83. DOI: 10.18127/j19997493-202002-09 (in Russian).