350 rub
Journal Achievements of Modern Radioelectronics №10 for 2020 г.
Article in number:
Object classification to account for antennas mutual influences
Type of article: scientific article
DOI: 10.18127/j20700784-202010-03
UDC: 621.391.82
Authors:

А.О. Perfilova – Ph.D. (Eng.), Doctoral Student,

Moscow Technical University Of Communications And Informatics (Moscow, Russia) E-mail: a_perfilova@bk.ru

Abstract:

The continuous increase in the number and variety of radio-electronic devices and the radio-frequency resource natural limitations are contradictory factors that lead to the problem of electromagnetic compatibility. Using methods for calculating the EMC parameters, it is advisable to divide into 2 levels objects (EMC-models): objects that are characterized by the near and intermediate fields (technical buildings, cars, etc.) and local objects (communication nodes, etc.) that are characterized by the far field. Depending on the object type different methods for calculating parameters are used. The analysis of existing object types is carried out. The calculating EMC parameters algorithms for various object types are obtained. The results can be used in practice to analyze the various object types EMC.

Pages: 50-55
For citation

Perfilova А.О. Object classification to account for antennas mutual influences. Achievements of modern radioelectronics. 2020. V. 74. № 10. P. 50–55. DOI: 10.18127/j20700784-202010-03. [in Russian]

References
  1. Azarov G.I., Perfilov O.Yu., Telezhnyy B.G. Problema ispol'zovaniya radiochastotnogo spektra sistemami svyazi v usloviyakh konversii. Tekhnologii i sredstva svyazi – Telekommunikatsii Moskovskogo regiona. 2000. № 3 (iyul'). S. 22–24. [in Russian]
  2. Perfilov O.Yu. Osobennosti problemy EMS kompleksov RES. Antenny. 2004. V. 6 (85). S. 84–88. [in Russian]
  3. Klimenko A.Ya., Panov B.A., Sveshnikov V.F. Kontaktnye pomekhi radiopriemu. M.: Voenizdat. 1979. [in Russian]
  4. GOST V 27317-87. Radiopriemniki. Metod kontrolya urovney izlucheniya geterodinov. 1987. [in Russian]
  5. Popovskiy V.V., Levchuk P.F. Problema EMS i ee reshenie sredstvami antennoy tekhniki. Leningrad: VAS. 1987. [in Russian]
  6. Metody rascheta moshchnosti pomekhi v sosednikh polosakh i kanalakh: Otchet № 654-3. Otchety MKKR. Prilozhenie k tomu 1. MSE. Dyussel'dorf. 1990. S. 222–234. [in Russian]
  7. Bykhovskiy M.A., Yashin V.D. Metodika opredeleniya zashchitnykh otnosheniy pri vozdeystvii na priemnik pomekh, deystvuyushchikh po nesovmeshchennomu kanalu. Trudy NIIR. 1989. № 4. S. 5–10. [in Russian]
  8. Perfilov O.Yu., Perfilova A.O., Troshin G.I. Vzaimnoe vliyanie blizko raspolozhennykh provolochnykh antenn na ikh diagrammy napravlennosti. Antenny. 2012. V. 3 (178). S. 67–71. [in Russian]
  9. Perfilova A.O., Bazhaev L.F., Perfilova M.V. Klassifikatsiya sovremennykh metodov resheniya zadach difraktsii radiovoln. Spetsial'naya tekhnika. 2015. V. 6. S. 2–6. [in Russian]
Date of receipt: 15.09.2020