A.V. Tsaptsov - Ph. D. (Eng.), Nudelman Precision Engineering Design Bureau (Moscow). E-mail: at_kbtm@mail.ru A.V. Molokin - Nudelman Precision Engineering Design Bureau (Moscow). E-mail: mail@kbtochmash.ru A.N. Velichko - Nudelman Precision Engineering Design Bureau (Moscow). E-mail: mail@kbtochmash.ru

Due to passive method of target detection and built-in gyro stabilization system (which greatly increase the whole accuracy) passive optical target seeker (TS) is widely adopted in aircraft and anti-aircraft missiles. For TS based on matrix IR-detector the triaxial stabilizer (with additional roll control channel) is hold much more promise than the traditional biaxial one. Collation of bi- and triaxial stabilizers was realized with use of dynamic simulation. TS-s dynamic model includes ones: stabilization system (bi- or triaxial), servo drives based on torque electro motors, IR-detector channel, missile-s body oscillations and relative motion «missile-to-target». TS-s stabilization system model is designed using Lagrange equations which allow to make a more detail research of how the missile body oscillations effect on TS accuracy. According to dynamic simulation results missile body oscillations with only amplitude 1° and frequency 1 Hz cause critical image blurring and target-s signal decreasing in biaxial TS. Moreover, in case nonzero missile observed bearing the biaxial TS measurement error is also increasing. For example, if missile ob-served bearing is equal to 2-3° the measurement error of line of sight angular velocity rises twice and detection range may reduce to 30-40%. On another side, triaxial TS holds minimal stabilization derivations and measurement errors and successfully blocks image blurring in case different levels rolling oscillations.

 

1. SHilin A.A. Obzor passivnykh opticheskikh GSN dlja porazhenija nazemnykh takticheskikh celejj // Izvestija TulGU. Tekhnicheskie nauki. 2014. № 7. S. 202−209.
2. SHHerbinin R.V. Golovki samonavedenija perspektivnykh zarubezhnykh upravljaemykh raket i aviabomb // Zarubezhnoe voennoe obozrenie. 2009. № 4. S. 64−68.
3. Tolpegin O.A., Novikov V.G. Matematicheskie modeli sistem navedenija letatelnykh apparatov. Kolomna: Izd-vo KI (f) MGOU. 2011.
4. Stepovojj A.V., Semenov A.V., Toloknov A.D., Capcov A.V. Issledovanie sistemy slezhenija za celju v uslovijakh vozdejjstvija vneshnikh faktorov // Voprosy oboronnojj tekhniki. Ser. 9. 2010. № 3(244)−4(245). S. 45−50.
5. Lebedev A.A., CHernobrovkin L.S. Dinamika poleta bespilotnykh letatelnykh apparatov: Ucheb. posobie dlja vuzov. Izd. 2-e, pererab. i dop. M.: Mashinostroenie. 1973.
6. Giroskopicheskie sistemy. Giroskopicheskie pribory i sistemy: Uchebnik dlja vuzov po specialnosti «Giroskopicheskie pribory i ustrojjstva» / Pod redakciejj D.S. Pelpora. M.: Vysshaja shkola. 1988.