350 rub
Journal №12 for 2012 г.
Article in number:
Joint effect of phenibut AND buspirone: experimental study
Authors:
D.F. Avgustinovich, T.G. Tolstikova
Abstract:
In the present study we determined effects of combined administration of the widely clinically used anxiolytic buspirone (0.05 mg/kg and 1 mg/kg; Sigma Chemical Co., USA), which is a partial agonist of 5-НТ1А receptors, and phenibut (25 mg/kg, Shenzhen Meredian Investment Co. Ltd, China), a GABAB receptors agonist. The objective was set to determine presence or absence of phenibut-s influence on buspirone-s effect as estimated by the animals - behavior. The experiments were performed on male mice of the C57BL/6J strain, being 3 months of age and having body weights of 24-27 g. The animals were placed one per experimental cage with the dimensions 28х14х10 cm, and 3.5 days later in the second part of the day (3.00 - 6.00 p.m.) the acute administration effects of phenibut and buspirone on the mice-s behavior were determined in the plus-maze test, a standard anxiety test. The following groups of mice were studied: «control1» - animals receiving an intraperitoneal injection of the saline30 minutes before the test; «buspirone0.05» - animals receiving an intraperitoneal injection of 0.05 mg/kg buspirone 30 minutes before the test; «buspirone1» - animals receiving an intraperitoneal injection of 1.0 mg/kg buspirone 30 minutes before the test; «control2» - per os administration of the saline + intraperitoneal injection of the saline 30 minutes after the first administration and half an hour before the test; «phenibut» - per os administration of 25 mg/kg phenibut + intraperitoneal injection of the saline 30 minutes after the first administration and half an hour before the test; «phenibut+buspirone0.05» - per os administration of 25 mg/kg phenibut + intraperitoneal injection of 0.05mg/kg buspirone 30 minutes after the first administration and half an hour before the test; «phenibut+buspirone1» - per os administration of 25 mg/kg phenibut + intraperitoneal injection of 1.0 mg/kg buspirone 30 minutes after the first administration and half an hour before the test. As the study demonstrated, the injections of both buspirone doses had no effect on behavior of the mice in the plus-maze test: the mice injected with buspirone did not differ from the mice injected with the saline by any parameters under investigation. However, the higher buspirone dose (1 mg/kg), as compared to the lower one (0.05 mg/kg), somewhat decreased locomotor activity, which was assessed by the total number of entries into and exits from the arms. Phenibut had no independent effect on the parameters of the mouse behavior in the maze, either. And yet, combined administration of both drugs - phenibut and buspirone - altered behavior of the mice in the elevated plus-maze test significantly. In this case buspirone-s effect was apparent even at the small dose (0.05 mg/kg), at which the number of head dipping decreased. While at the higher buspirone dose (1 mg/kg) 6 out of 9 estimated maze parameters changed. Thus, the conducted study revealed absence of any effects of separate acute administration of buspirone or phenibut, as well as presence of an expressed dose-dependent effect of buspirone on the behavioral parameters in the animals preliminarily receiving phenibut. The revealed fact that phenibut potentiates buspirone-s effect is of principal importance as it demonstrates one of practicable methods of increasing the anxiolytic-s effectiveness along with dose reduction.
Pages: 59-64
References
  1. Blier P., Ward N..M. Is there a role for 5-HT1A agonists in the treatment of depression - // Biol. Psychiatry. 2003.V. 53. № 3. P. 193-203.
  2. Apter J.T., Allen L.A. Buspirone: future directions // J. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 1999. V. 19. № 1. P. 86-93.
  3. Nemeroff C.B. Anxiolytics: past, present, and future agents // J. Clin. Psychiatry. 2003. V. 64(Suppl 3). P. 3-6.
  4. Levine J., Cole D.P., Chengappa K.N., Gershon S. Anxiety disorders and major depression, together or apart // Depress. Anxiety. 2001. V. 14. № 2. P. 94-104.
  5. Jones B.J., Blackburn T.P. The medical benefit of 5-HT research // Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 2002. V. 71. № 4. P. 555-568.
  6. Stahl S.M. Mixed depression and anxiety: serotonin1A receptors as a common pharmacologic link // J. Clin. Psychiatry. 1997. V 58(Suppl 8). P. 20-26.
  7. Lydiard R.B., Brawman-Mintzer O. Anxious depression // J. Clin. Psychiatry. 1998. V. 59(Suppl 18). P. 10-17.
  8. Ballenger J.C. Anxiety and Depression: Optimizing Treatments // Prim. Care Companion J. Clin. Psichiatry. 2000. V. 3. P. 71-79.
  9. Den Boer J.A., Bosker F.J., Slaap B.R. Serotonergic drugs in the treatment of depressive and anxiety disorders // Hum. Psychopharmacol. (Hum. Psychopharmacol. Clin. Exp). 2000. V. 15. № 5. P. 315-336.
  10. Nelson J.C. Augmentation strategies in depression // J. Clin. Psychiatry. 2000. V. 61(Suppl 2). P. 13-19.
  11. Sramek J.J, Tansman M., Suri A., Hornig-Rohan M., Amsterdam J.D., Stahl S.M., Weisler R.H., Cutler N.R. Efficacy of buspirone in generalized anxiety disorder with coexsting mild depressive symptoms // J. Clin. Psychiatry. 1996. V. 57. № 7. P. 287-291.
  12. Culpepper L. Generalized anxiety disorder in primary care: emerging issues in management and treatment. // J. Clin. Psychiatry. 2002. V. 63(Suppl 8). P. 35-42.
  13. Sramek J.J., Zarotsky V., Cutler N.R. Generalised anxiety disorder: treatment options // Drugs. 2002. V. 62. № 11. P. 1635-1648.
  14. Gorman J.M. Treating generalized anxiety disorder // J. Clin. Psychiatry. 2003. V. 64(Suppl 2). P. 24-29.
  15. Goodman W.K. Selecting pharmacotherapy for generalized anxiety disorder // J. Clin. Psychiatry. 2004. V. 65 (Suppl 13). P. 8-13.
  16. De Vry J., Glaser T., Schuurman T.,Schreiber R., Traber J.5-HT1A receptors in anxiety / New Concepts in Anxiety / ed. M. Briley// London: MacMillan Press. 1991. P. 94-129.
  17. De Vry J.M., Schreiber R., Glaser T., Traber J. Behavioral pharmacology of 5-HT1A agonists: animal models of anxiety and depression. / Serotonin 1A receptors in depression and anxiety / eds. S.M. Stahl, M. Gastpar, J.M. Keppel Hesselink, J. Traber // New York: Raven Press. 1992. P. 55-81.
  18. Griebel G. 5-Hydroxytryptamine-interacting drugs in animal models of anxiety disorders: more than 30 years of research // Pharmacol. Ther. 1995. V. 65. № 3. P. 319-395.
  19. Menard J., Treit D. Effects of centrally administered anxiolytic compounds in animal models of anxiety // Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 1999. V. 23. № 4. P. 591-613.
  20. Nishi K., Kanemaru K., Hasegawa S., Watanabe A., Diksic M.Both acute and chronic buspirone treatments have different effects on regional 5-HT synthesis in Flinders Sensitive Line rats (a rat model of depression) than in control rats // Neurochem. Int. 2009. V. 54. № 3-4. P. 205-214.
  21. Avgustinovich D.F., Alekseyenko O.V., Koryakina L.A. Effects of chronic treatment with ipsapirone and buspirone on the C57BL/6J strain mice under social stress // Life Sci. 2003. V. 72. № 13. P. 1437-1444.
  22. Августинович Д.Ф., Вишнивецкая Г.Б., Корякина Л.А. Эффекты острого и хронического введения буспирона на коммуникативность мышей с опытом социальных пора­жений // Бюллетень экспериментальной биологии и медицины. 2010. Т. 149. № 1. С. 64-68.
  23. Pollack M.H. Refractory generalized anxiety disorder // J. Clin. Psychiatry. 2009. V. 70 (Suppl 2). P. 32-38.
  24. Хаунина Р.А., Лапин И.П. Применение фенибута в пси­хиатрии и неврологии и его место среди других психо­тропных средств. // Журнал невропатологии и психиатрии им. С.С. Корсакова. 1989. Т. 89. № 4. С. 142-151.
  25. Lapin I.P. Phenibut (beta-phenyl-GABA): a tranquilizer and nootropic drug // CNS Drug Rev. 2001. V. 7. P. 471-481.
  26. Белозерцева И.В., Андреев Б.В. Фармако-этологическое изучение ГАМКергических механизмов регуляции деп­рессивноподобного поведения мышей // Журнал высшей нервной деятельности. 1997. Т. 47. № 6. С. 1024-1031.
  27. Белозерцева И.В., Андреев Б.В. Регуляция агрессивного поведения мышей (фармакологический анализ ГАМКергических механизмов) // Журнал высшей нервной деятельности. 1999. Т. 49. № 5. С. 780-788.
  28. Белозерцева И.В., Андреев Б.В. Влияние ГАМК-пози­тивных средств на формирование зависимости от морфина и проявления синдрома отмены // Экспериментальная клиническая фармакология. 2000. Т. 63. № 1. С. 19-23.
  29. Зяблицева Е.А., Павлова И.В. Влияние агониста ГАМК-рецепторов - фенибута на поведение и дыхание кроликов в эмоционально-негативных ситуациях. // Журнал высшей нервной деятельности. 2007. Т. 57. № 4. С. 479-488.
  30. DambrovaM., Zvejniece L., Liepinsh E., Cirule H., Zharkova O., Veinberg G., Kalvinsh I. Comparative pharmacological activity of optical isomers of phenibut // Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2008. V. 583. № 1. P. 128-134.
  31. Cao B.J., Rodgers R.J. Comparative behavioural profiles of buspirone and its metabolite 1-(2-pyrimidinyl)-piperazine (1-PP) in the murine elevated plus-maze // Neuropharmacology. 1997. V. 36. № 8. P. 1089-1097.
  32. Cryan J.F., Kaupmann K. Don't worry "B" happy!: a role for GABA(B) receptors in anxiety and depression // Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2005. V. 26. P. 36-43.
  33. Bowery N.G. GABAB receptor: a site of therapeutic benefit // Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 2006. V. 6. P. 37-43.
  34. Kudryavtseva N.N., Avgustinovich D.F., Bondar N.P., Tenditnik M.V., Kovalenko I.L.An experimental approach for the study of psychotropic drug effects under simulated clinical conditions // Curr.Drug. Metabolism. 2008. V. 9. № 4. P. 352-360.
  35. Августинович Д.Ф., Алексеенко О.В., Бакштановская И.В., Корякина Л.А., Липина Т.В., Тендитник М.В., Бондарь Н.П., Коваленко И.Л., Кудрявцева Н.Н. Динамические изменения серотонергической и дофаминергической активности мозга в процессе развития тревожной депрессии: экспериментальное исследование (обзор) // Успехи физиологических наук. 2004. Т. 35. № 4. С. 19-40.
  36. Haller J., Baranyi J., Bakos N., Halász J. Social instability in female rats: effects on anxiety and buspirone efficacy // Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2004. V. 174. № 2. P. 197-202.
  37. Berlin I., Chalon S., Payan C., Schöllnhammer G., Cesselin F., Varoquaux O., Puech A.J. Evaluation of the alpha 2-adre­noceptor blocking properties of buspirone and ipsapirone in healthy subjects. Relationship with the plasma concentration of the common metabolite 1-(2-pyrimidinyl)-piperazine // Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 1995. V. 39. № 3. P. 243-249.
  38. Piñeyro G., Blier P. Autoregulation of serotonin neurons: role in antidepressant drug action // Pharmacol. Rev. 1999. V. 51. № 3. P. 533-591.
  39. Lucki I., Singh A., Kreiss D.S. Antidepressant-like behavioral effects of serotonin receptor agonists // Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 1994. V. 18. P. 85-95.
  40. Sakr A., Andheria M. Pharmacokinetics of buspirone extended-release tablets: a single-dose study // J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2001. V. 41. № 7. P. 783-789.