Article or book title, author's surname, DOI

Automated graph neural network architecture selection via a hypothesis-testing loop with large language models

N.V. Blokhin1

research article UDC 519.171.2 + 004.852 Pages: 47-55 doi.org/10.18127/j19997493-202605-07

  1. 1 Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation (Moscow, Russia)

Abstract

Today, when applying graph neural networks, the problem of selecting an appropriate architecture is relevant. Existing approaches to architecture search and hyperparameter tuning are typically resource-intensive and opaque in terms of the decisions they make, while emerging methods based on large language models offer a promising way to address this gap. The goal is to develop and experimentally evaluate an algorithm for automatic graph neural network architecture selection based on a "hypothesis–measurement–decision–reflection" reasoning loop, in which hypotheses are generated by a large language model and verified in a controlled Python environment with no restrictions on the set of analyzed graph properties. The proposed HypoGNN algorithm formalizes architecture search as an iterative decision-making process. Each iteration consists of four steps with mandatory fixation of the formulated hypothesis, measurement of graph properties, training of the architecture, and reflection on the step's outcome. A systematic comparison of HypoGNN with six baseline methods under a comparable computational budget is carried out. The proposed method achieves the best average accuracy on five out of six datasets and demonstrates the most stable performance among all considered approaches. The formal structure of the loop also enables quantitative analysis of the search trajectory. The obtained results can be used in the development of applied models on graph data. The proposed algorithm can be integrated into existing graph neural network training pipelines.

Received
07.09.2026
Approved after review
15.09.2026
Accepted
01.10.2026

How to cite

Блохин Н.В. Метод автоматического выбора архитектуры графовой нейронной сети на основе цикла проверки гипотез с использованием больших языковых моделей // Динамика сложных систем - XXI век. 2026. Т. 20. № 5. С. 47−55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18127/j19997493-202605-07

References
  1. Bloxin N.V. Metod postroeniya ierarxicheskoj ukladki grafov na osnove silovy`x algoritmov i grafovy`x nejronny`x setej. Informacionno-izmeritel`ny`e i upravlyayushhie sistemy`. 2025. T. 23. № 3. S. 37–46. DOI 10.18127/j20700814-202503-04 (in Russian).
  2. Bloxin N.V., Makrushin S.V. Postroenie e`mbeddingov kompanij na osnove vektornogo predstavleniya otraslej e`konomiki i svyazej mezhdu kompaniyami. Nejrokomp`yutery`: razrabotka, primenenie. 2025. T. 27. № 2. S. 5–12. DOI 10.18127/j19998554-202502-01 (in Russian).
  3. Cassimon T., Mercelis S., Mets K. Neural Architecture Search under Black-Box Objectives with Deep Reinforcement Learning and Increasingly-Sparse Rewards. Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Information and Communication (ICAIIC). Fukuoka, Japan: IEEE. 2020. DOI 10.1109/ICAIIC48513.2020.9065031
  4. Bergstra J., Bengio Y. Random Search for Hyper-Parameter Optimization. Journal of Machine Learning Research. 2012. V. 13. P. 281–305.
  5. Akiba T., Sano S., Yanase T., Ohta T., Koyama M. Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Framework. Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD '19). Anchorage, AK. USA: ACM. 2019. P. 2623–2631. arXiv:1907.10902.
  6. Elsken T., Metzen J.H., Hutter F. Neural Architecture Search: A Survey. Journal of Machine Learning Research. 2019. V. 20. № 55. P. 1–21.
  7. Oloulade B.M., Gao J., Chen J., Lyu T., Al-Sabri R. Graph Neural Architecture Search: A Survey. Tsinghua Science and Technology. 2022. V. 27. № 4. P. 692–708. DOI 10.26599/TST.2021.9010057
  8. Gao Y., Yang H., Zhang P., Zhou C., Hu Y. Graph Neural Architecture Search. Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-20). 2020. P. 1403–1409. DOI 10.24963/ijcai.2020/195
  9. Liu H., Simonyan K., Yang Y. DARTS: Differentiable Architecture Search. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR 2019). New Orleans, LA, USA, 2019.
  10. Qin Y., Zhang Z., Wang X., Zhang Z., Zhu W. NAS-Bench-Graph: Benchmarking Graph Neural Architecture Search. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 35 (NeurIPS 2022). Datasets and Benchmarks Track. 2022.
  11. Wang H., Gao Y., Zheng X., Zhang P., Bu J., Yu P.S. Graph Neural Architecture Search with Large Language Models. Science China Information Sciences. 2025. V. 68. Art. 222103. DOI 10.1007/s11432-024-4539-1
  12. Wang J., Liu H., Di S., Wang Z., Wang J., Chen L., Zhou X. Proficient Graph Neural Network Design by Accumulating Knowledge on Large Language Models. Proceedings of the 19th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM '26). Boise, ID, USA: ACM. 2026. DOI 10.1145/3773966.3777982
  13. Zheng X., Wei L., Li Y., Yao Q. Automated Decision-Making on Networks with LLMs through Knowledge-Guided Evolution. Proceedings of the Thirty-Fourth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2025), Demo Track. 2025. P. 11137–11140. DOI 10.24963/ijcai.2025/1279
  14. Yao S., Zhao J., Yu D., Du N., Shafran I., Narasimhan K., Cao Y. ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR 2023). Kigali, Rwanda. 2023.
  15. Wang X., Chen Y., Yuan L., Zhang Y., Li Y., Peng H., Ji H. Executable Code Actions Elicit Better LLM Agents. Proceedings of the 41st International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML 2024). PMLR, 2024. V. 235. P. 50208–50232.
  16. Lu C., Lu C., Lange R.T., Foerster J., Clune J., Ha D. The AI Scientist: Towards Fully Automated Open-Ended Scientific Discovery. 2024. arXiv:2408.06292.