D.A. Kalacheva1, K.I. Porsev2

1,2 Yaroslavl State Technical University (Yaroslavl, Russia)
1 kalachevada@edu.ystu.ru, 2 porsevki@ystu.ru

Currently, in order to ensure high product quality, increase productivity and uptime of machine-building products, it is necessary to introduce specialized software that will cover all departments of the enterprise and the life cycle processes of high-tech products. The main systems in this case are: product lifecycle management systems, enterprise management and production process management.

Often these systems are not integrated into a single platform due to the lack of a single data integration standard. At the same time, there is a need to form a single information space for all participants in the product lifecycle processes.

To implement a single information space, it is necessary to combine the main systems, which will ensure fast and efficient information exchange, as well as full-fledged management of design and technological preparation of production.

According to the GOST R IEC 62264-1-2014 standard, based on the IEC 62264-1:2003 standard, the functional hierarchy of production consists of the following levels: levels 2, 1 and 0 represent the functions of dispatching control of production modules or production lines, operational management functions and process control functions; levels 4 and 3 are the functions of business planning, logistics, production management, workflow in the production of required products.

The main advantages of integrating corporate information systems:

a) Full control over the product from the customer's order to the delivery of the goods, which ensures the parallelism of the manufacturing processes of high-tech products.

b) The transition from traditional production to individual «customized», in such companies, customers can make changes to the design and production processes.

c) Saving time and costs becomes possible by getting rid of multiple data entry, improving coordination between business departments.

d) Improvement of the quality management system through the integration of information systems and the transition to «smart factories».

Problems that need to be solved when organizing a single information space:

a) Organizational problems associated with the transition to «smart factories» and the heterogeneity of the levels of intellectualization of enterprises.

b) A large selection of information systems from foreign and domestic, implemented as a ready-made solution or with modification «on the spot», as well as having different functionality.

c) The lack of methodological elaboration without taking into account the advantages of new technologies, limited resources, the need to inspect the enterprise before the introduction of information systems.

d) Lack of technical modernization and financial opportunities, lack of computer equipment and software, outdated technologies, high cost of solutions.

e) The problem of data and its security. A manufacturing company needs to store and manage data changes in information systems, as well as ensure data confidentiality.

As a result of the research, the advantages and disadvantages of organizing a single information space are analyzed, and the direction of further research related to solving the problems of integrating corporate information systems is determined.

Kalacheva D.A., Porsev K.I. Analysis of the current state of problems of integration of corporate information systems at high-tech industrial enterprises. Dynamics of complex systems. 2024. V. 18. № 4. P. 50−57. DOI: 10.18127/j19997493-202404-05 (in Russian).

1. Ovchinnikova O.P., Ostrovskaya A.A. Upravlenie organizaciej v kontekste cifrovoj transformacii. Ekonomika i upravlenie: problemy, resheniya. 2023. T. 6. № 10(139). S. 38–43 (in Russian).
2. Avvaru V. S., Bruno G., Chiabert P., Traini E. Integration of PLM, MES and ERP Systems to Optimize the Engineering, Production and Business [Elektronnyj resurs]. PORTO @ Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca. URL: https://iris.polito.it/handle/11583/2885020 (data obrashcheniya: 30.01.2024).
3. Dorrer M.G., Shumilina M.A. Integraciya razlichnyh sistem planirovaniya resursov i upravleniya zhiznennym ciklom (OBZOR) [Elektronnyj resurs]. Setevoj nauchnyj zhurnal «Inzhenernyj vestnik Dona». URL: http://www.ivdon.ru/ru/magazine/archive/n12y2022/ 8074 (data obrashcheniya: 28.01.2024) (in Russian).
4. Erofeev V.S. Metody i tekhnologii upravleniya zhiznennym ciklom slozhnyh izdelij i inzhenernyh ob"ektov. Ekonomika vysokotekhnologichnyh proizvodstv. 2020. T. 1 № 2. S. 53–62 (in Russian).
5. Osman N., Sahraoui A. From PLM TO ERP: a software systems engineering integration. International Journal of Software Engineering & Applications (IJSEA). January 2018. V. 9. № 1. P. 1–27.
6. Emel'yanova I.A., Efimova O.E. Vozmozhnosti dlya analiza zhiznennogo cikla produkta na predpriyatii. Informacionnye tekhnologii v stroitel'nyh, social'nyh i ekonomicheskih sistemah. 2022. № 4 (30). S. 157–160 (in Russian).
7. GOST R MEK 62264-1-2014. Nacional'nyj standart Rossijskoj Federacii. Integraciya sistem upravleniya predpriyatiem. Chast' 1. Modeli i terminologiya. Data vvedeniya 2016-01-01. FGUP «Standartinform». 68 s. (in Russian).
8. Zimovec A.V., Klimachev T.D. Cifrovaya transformaciya proizvodstva na rossijskih predpriyatiyah v usloviyah politiki importozameshcheniya. Zhurnal «Voprosy innovacionnoj ekonomiki». Iyul'–sentyabr' 2022. T. 12. №3. S. 1409–1425 (in Russian).
9. Hajder M.M. Razvitie innovacionnyh podhodov k formirovaniyu sistemy upravleniya kachestvom v usloviyah Industrii 4.0. Sovremennaya ekonomika: problemy i resheniya. 2022. № 4(148). S. 144–153 (in Russian).
10. Zehbold C. Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) im Kontext von Industrie 4.0. Digitalisierung in Industrie-, Handels- und Dienstleistungsunternehmen. 2022. P. 93–111.
11. Bulavin V.F., Bulavina T.G. Cifrovoe proektirovanie v malyh mashinostroitel'nyh predpriyatiyah. Vestnik Vologodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Tekhnicheskie nauki. 2022. № 4(18). S. 50–52 (in Russian).
12. Li D., Fast-Berglund A., Paulin D. Current and future Industry 4.0 capabilities for information and knowledge sharing. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 2019. № 105. P. 3951–3963.
13. Slot M., Navis E., Damgrave R., Lutters E. Versatile information provisioning in a configure-to-order production environment: a case study. Procedia CIRP. 2023. V. 120. P.1469–1474.
14. Digital transformation in the new product development process: the role of it-enabled PLM systems for relational, structural, and NPD performance [Elektronnyj resurs]. International Journal of Innovation Management. V. 23. №07. URL: https://doi.org/10.1142/S136 3919619500671 (data obrashcheniya: 28.02.2024).
15. Ponomarev O. «Virtual'naya fabrika» dlya real'nogo biznesa. Metody menedzhmenta kachestva. 2020. № 5. S. 28–33 (in Russian).
16. Afanas'ev A.A. Cifrovaya transformaciya mashinostroeniya Rossii v kontekste chetvertoj promyshlennoj revolyucii. Voprosy innovacionnoj ekonomiki. 2024. T. 14. № 1. S. 221–240 (in Russian).
17. Zelencova L.S., Matveev G.S. Organizacionno-ekonomicheskij mekhanizm upravleniya adaptaciej promyshlennoj organizaciej. Dinamika slozhnyh sistem. 2022. T. 23. № 2. S. 59−67. DOI: 10.18127/j19997493-202202-07 (in Russian).
18. Chung S., Kim M. How smart is a «smart factory»?: an organizational view. [Elektronnyj resurs]. Industrial and Corporate Change. 2023. URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtad070 (data obrashcheniya: 20.03.2024).
19. Logunova N.Yu. Metody rascheta pokazatelej effektivnosti razvitiya avtomatizacii informacionnoj podderzhki proizvodstvennyh processov predpriyatij pishchevoj promyshlennosti na osnove intellektual'nyh tekhnologij. Dinamika slozhnyh sistem. 2023. T. 17. № 1.
    S. 63−68. DOI: 10.18127/j19997493-202301-05 (in Russian).
20. Karmakova M. Neodnorodnyj IT-landshaft. Promyshlennye stranicy. 2023. № 5. S. 68–76 (in Russian).
21. Chernyh N.A., Krylov S.V. Otdel'nye aspekty vnedreniya i avtomatizacii razdel'nogo uchyota na krupnom dvigatelestroitel'nom predpriyatii. Kant. 2023. № 2(47). S. 106–112 (in Russian).
22. Izmajlov M.K., Arbenina E.A. Instrumenty cifrovoj ekonomiki kak sposoby obespecheniya effektivnogo funkcionirovaniya sistemy proizvodstvennogo menedzhmenta predpriyatiya. Voprosy regional'noj ekonomiki. 2022. № 4(53). S. 37–50 (in Russian).
23. Kamaletdinova L.R., Romanov A.A. Obzor promyshlennyh PLM-sistem. Vestnik Ul'yanovskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta. 2023. № 3(103). S. 41-46 (in Russian).
24. Voronin P.A., Belevcev A.M., Sadreev F.G. Metodika ocenki i vybora PLM-sistem pri cifrovoj transformacii mashinostroitel'nogo predpriyatiya. Izv. YuFU. Ser.: Tekhnicheskie nauki. 2022. № 4(228). S. 6–15 (in Russian).
25. Golubeva O.L. Analiz funkcional'nyh vozmozhnostej sovremennyh ERP-sistem. Upravlenie v sovremennyh sistemah. 2022. №3 (35). S. 43–58 (in Russian).
26. Cholewa M., Minh L.H.B. PLM Solutions in the Process of Supporting the Implementation and Maintenance of the Circular Economy Concept in Manufacturing Companies [Elektronnyj resurs]. Sustainability 2021. 13. 10589. URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910589 (data obrashcheniya: 07.03.2024).
27. Vedmid' P., Shchejnikov C. Pochemu vnedrenie novyh tekhnologij PLM proiskhodit medlenno?. Upravlenie proizvodstvom. Specvypusk «Cifrovoe proizvodstvo: segodnya i zavtra rossijskoj promyshlennosti». Dekabr' 2017. № 2. S. 43–49 (in Russian).
28. Osiko S.M., Vlasova L.G. Cifrovaya podgotovka i organizaciya proizvodstva: sostoyanie i perspektivy razvitiya. Innovacii v menedzhmente. 2023. № 1(35). S. 40–48 (in Russian).
29. Talhi A., Fortineau V., Huet J.-C., Lamouri S. Ontology for cloud manufacturing based Product Lifecycle Management. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing. 2019. V. 30. P. 2171–2192.
30. Salienko N.V., Chechnev V.B. Korporativnye informacionnye sistemy kak instrument povysheniya effektivnosti upravleniya predpriyatiyami oboronno-promyshlennogo kompleksa. Dinamika slozhnyh sistem. 2023. T. 17. № 2. S. 35−40. DOI: 10.18127/j19997493-202302-04 (in Russian).
31. Osipenko S., Kozlov A., Solov'ev S. Cifrovaya transformaciya promyshlennogo sektora. Nauka i innovacii. 2022. № 3(229). S. 6–14 (in Russian).
32. Kwon S., Monnier L.V., Barbau R., Bernstein W.Z. Enriching standards-based digital thread by fusing as-designed and as-inspected data using knowledge graphs [Elektronnyj resurs]. Advanced Engineering Informatics. October 2020. V. 46. URL: https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.aei.2020.101102 (data obrashcheniya: 01.03.2024).
33. Kostin K.B., Shimko P.D. Povyshenie effektivnosti upravleniya dohodami predpriyatij v rossijskoj federacii v sovremennyh usloviyah sankcionnyh ogranichenij. Ekonomicheskie otnosheniya. 2022. T. 12. № 4. S. 671–698 (in Russian).